subsurface/Rules.mk

283 lines
11 KiB
Makefile
Raw Normal View History

# -*- Makefile -*-
# Rules for building and creating the version file
VERSION_FILE = version.h
# There's only one line in $(VERSION_FILE); use the shell builtin `read'
STORED_VERSION_STRING = \
$(subst ",,$(shell [ ! -r $(VERSION_FILE) ] || \
read ignore ignore v <$(VERSION_FILE) && echo $$v))
#" workaround editor syntax highlighting quirk
GET_VERSION = ./scripts/get-version
VERSION_STRING := $(shell $(GET_VERSION) linux || echo "v$(VERSION)")
# Mac Info.plist style with three numbers 1.2.3
CFBUNDLEVERSION_STRING := $(shell $(GET_VERSION) darwin $(VERSION_STRING) || \
echo "$(VERSION).0")
# Windows .nsi style with four numbers 1.2.3.4
PRODVERSION_STRING := $(shell $(GET_VERSION) win $(VERSION_STRING) || \
echo "$(VERSION).0.0")
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
MSGOBJS=$(addprefix share/locale/,$(MSGLANGS:.po=.UTF-8/LC_MESSAGES/$(NAME).mo))
ifeq ($(V),1)
PRETTYECHO=true
COMPILE_PREFIX=
else
PRETTYECHO=echo
COMPILE_PREFIX=@
endif
C_SOURCES = $(filter %.c, $(SOURCES))
CXX_SOURCES = $(filter %.cpp, $(SOURCES)) $(RESOURCES:.qrc=.qrc.cpp)
OTHER_SOURCES = $(filter-out %.c %.cpp, $(SOURCES))
OBJS = $(C_SOURCES:.c=.o) $(CXX_SOURCES:.cpp=.o) $(OTHER_SOURCES)
# Add the objects for the header files which define QObject subclasses
HEADERS_NEEDING_MOC += $(shell grep -l -s 'Q_OBJECT' $(HEADERS))
MOC_OBJS = $(HEADERS_NEEDING_MOC:.h=.moc.o)
ALL_OBJS = $(OBJS) $(MOC_OBJS)
# Files for using Qt Creator
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
CREATOR_FILES = $(NAME).config $(NAME).creator $(NAME).files $(NAME).includes
all: $(NAME) doc
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
$(TARGET): gen_version_file $(ALL_OBJS) $(MSGOBJS) $(INFOPLIST)
@$(PRETTYECHO) ' LINK' $(TARGET)
$(COMPILE_PREFIX)$(CXX) $(LDFLAGS) -o $(TARGET) $(ALL_OBJS) $(LIBS)
gen_version_file $(VERSION_FILE):
ifneq ($(STORED_VERSION_STRING),$(VERSION_STRING))
$(info updating $(VERSION_FILE) to $(VERSION_STRING))
@echo \#define VERSION_STRING \"$(VERSION_STRING)\" >$(VERSION_FILE)
endif
install: all
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(BINDIR)
$(INSTALL) $(NAME) $(BINDIR)
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(DESKTOPDIR)
$(INSTALL) $(DESKTOPFILE) $(DESKTOPDIR)
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(ICONDIR)
$(INSTALL) -m 644 $(ICONFILE) $(ICONDIR)
@-if test -z "$(DESTDIR)"; then \
$(gtk_update_icon_cache); \
fi
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(MANDIR)
$(INSTALL) -m 644 $(MANFILES) $(MANDIR)
@-if test ! -z "$(XSLT)"; then \
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(DATADIR)/$(NAME); \
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(XSLTDIR); \
$(INSTALL) -m 644 $(XSLTFILES) $(XSLTDIR); \
fi
@-if test ! -z "$(MARBLEDIR)"; then \
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(DATADIR)/$(NAME)/$(MARBLEDIR); \
$(TAR) cf - $(MARBLEDIR) | ( cd $(DATADIR)/$(NAME); $(TAR) xf - ); \
fi
for LOC in $(wildcard share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES); do \
$(INSTALL) -d $(prefix)/$$LOC; \
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
$(INSTALL) -m 644 $$LOC/$(NAME).mo $(prefix)/$$LOC/$(NAME).mo; \
done
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(DOCDIR)
$(INSTALL) -m 644 Documentation/user-manual.html $(DOCDIR)
for IMG in $(wildcard Documentation/images/*); do \
$(INSTALL) -m 644 $$IMG $(DOCDIR)/images; \
done
install-macosx: all
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/Resources
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/MacOS
$(INSTALL) $(NAME) $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/MacOS/$(NAME)-bin
$(INSTALL) $(MACOSXFILES)/$(NAME).sh $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/MacOS/$(NAME)
$(INSTALL) $(MACOSXFILES)/PkgInfo $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/
$(INSTALL) $(MACOSXFILES)/Info.plist $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/
$(INSTALL) $(ICONFILE) $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/Resources/
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
$(INSTALL) $(MACOSXFILES)/$(CAPITALIZED_NAME).icns $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/Resources/
@-if test ! -z "$(MARBLEDIR)"; then \
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/Resources/share/$(MARBLEDIR); \
$(TAR) cf - $(MARBLEDIR) | ( cd $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/Resources/share; $(TAR) xf - ); \
fi
for LOC in $(wildcard share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES); do \
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/Resources/$$LOC; \
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
$(INSTALL) $$LOC/$(NAME).mo $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/Resources/$$LOC/$(NAME).mo; \
done
@-if test ! -z "$(XSLT)"; then \
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/Resources/xslt; \
$(INSTALL) -m 644 $(XSLTFILES) $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/Resources/xslt/; \
fi
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/resources/share/doc/$(NAME)
$(INSTALL) -m 644 Documentation/user-manual.html $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/Resources/share/doc/$(NAME)
for IMG in $(wildcard Documentation/images/*); do \
$(INSTALL) -m 644 $$IMG $(MACOSXINSTALL)/Contents/Resources/share/doc/$(NAME)/images; \
done
create-macosx-bundle: all
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/Resources
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/MacOS
$(INSTALL) $(NAME) $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/MacOS/
$(INSTALL) $(MACOSXFILES)/PkgInfo $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/
$(INSTALL) $(MACOSXFILES)/Info.plist $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/
$(INSTALL) $(ICONFILE) $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/Resources/
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
$(INSTALL) $(MACOSXFILES)/$(CAPITALIZED_NAME).icns $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/Resources/
for LOC in $(wildcard share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES); do \
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/Resources/$$LOC; \
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
$(INSTALL) $$LOC/$(NAME).mo $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/Resources/$$LOC/$(NAME).mo; \
done
@-if test ! -z "$(XSLT)"; then \
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/Resources/xslt; \
$(INSTALL) -m 644 $(XSLTFILES) $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/Resources/xslt/; \
fi
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/resources/share/doc/$(NAME)
$(INSTALL) -m 644 Documentation/user-manual.html $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/Resources/share/doc/$(NAME)
for IMG in $(wildcard Documentation/images/*); do \
$(INSTALL) -m 644 $$IMG $(MACOSXSTAGING)/Contents/Resources/share/doc/$(NAME)/images; \
done
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
$(GTK_MAC_BUNDLER) packaging/macosx/$(NAME).bundle
sign-macosx-bundle: all
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
codesign -s "3A8CE62A483083EDEA5581A61E770EC1FA8BECE8" /Applications/$(CAPITALIZED_NAME).app/Contents/MacOS/$(NAME)-bin
install-cross-windows: all
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(WINDOWSSTAGING)/share/locale
for MSG in $(WINMSGDIRS); do\
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(WINDOWSSTAGING)/$$MSG;\
$(INSTALL) $(CROSS_PATH)/$$MSG/* $(WINDOWSSTAGING)/$$MSG;\
done
for LOC in $(wildcard share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES); do \
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(WINDOWSSTAGING)/$$LOC; \
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
$(INSTALL) $$LOC/$(NAME).mo $(WINDOWSSTAGING)/$$LOC/$(NAME).mo; \
done
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(WINDOWSSTAGING)/share/doc/$(NAME)
$(INSTALL) -m 644 Documentation/user-manual.html $(WINDOWSSTAGING)/share/doc/$(NAME)
for IMG in $(wildcard Documentation/images/*); do \
$(INSTALL) -m 644 $$IMG $(WINDOWSSTAGING)/share/doc/$(NAME)/images; \
done
create-windows-installer: all $(NSIFILE) install-cross-windows
$(MAKENSIS) $(NSIFILE)
$(NSIFILE): $(NSIINPUTFILE)
$(shell cat $(NSIINPUTFILE) | sed -e 's/VERSIONTOKEN/$(VERSION_STRING)/;s/PRODVTOKEN/$(PRODVERSION_STRING)/' > $(NSIFILE))
$(INFOPLIST): $(INFOPLISTINPUT)
$(shell cat $(INFOPLISTINPUT) | sed -e 's/CFBUNDLEVERSION_TOKEN/$(CFBUNDLEVERSION_STRING)/' > $(INFOPLIST))
# Transifex merge the translations
update-po-files:
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
xgettext -o po/$(NAME)-new.pot -s -k_ -kN_ -ktr --keyword=C_:1c,2 --add-comments="++GETTEXT" *.c qt-ui/*.cpp
tx push -s
tx pull -af
MOCFLAGS = $(filter -I%, $(CXXFLAGS) $(EXTRA_FLAGS)) $(filter -D%, $(CXXFLAGS) $(EXTRA_FLAGS))
%.o: %.c
@$(PRETTYECHO) ' CC' $<
@mkdir -p .dep/$(@D)
$(COMPILE_PREFIX)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_FLAGS) -MD -MF .dep/$@.dep -c -o $@ $<
%.o: %.cpp
@$(PRETTYECHO) ' CXX' $<
@mkdir -p .dep/$(@D)
$(COMPILE_PREFIX)$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) $(EXTRA_FLAGS) -MD -MF .dep/$@.dep -c -o $@ $<
# This rule is for running the moc on QObject subclasses defined in the .h
# files.
%.moc.cpp: %.h
@$(PRETTYECHO) ' MOC' $<
$(COMPILE_PREFIX)$(MOC) $(MOCFLAGS) $< -o $@
# This rule is for running the moc on QObject subclasses defined in the .cpp
# files; remember to #include "<file>.moc" at the end of the .cpp file, or
# you'll get linker errors ("undefined vtable for...")
%.moc: %.cpp
@$(PRETTYECHO) ' MOC' $<
$(COMPILE_PREFIX)$(MOC) -i $(MOCFLAGS) $< -o $@
# This creates the Qt resource sources.
%.qrc.cpp: %.qrc
@$(PRETTYECHO) ' RCC' $<
$(COMPILE_PREFIX)$(RCC) $< -o $@
%.qrc:
# This creates the ui headers.
ui_%.h: %.ui
@$(PRETTYECHO) ' UIC' $<
$(COMPILE_PREFIX)$(UIC) $< -o $@
# This forces the creation of ui headers with the wrong path
# This is required because the -MG option to the compiler outputs
# unknown files with no path prefix
ui_%.h: qt-ui/%.ui
@$(PRETTYECHO) ' UIC' $<
$(COMPILE_PREFIX)$(UIC) $< -o qt-ui/$@
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
share/locale/%.UTF-8/LC_MESSAGES/$(NAME).mo: po/%.po po/%.aliases
@$(PRETTYECHO) ' MSGFMT' $*.po
@mkdir -p $(dir $@)
$(COMPILE_PREFIX)msgfmt -c -o $@ po/$*.po
@-if test -s po/$*.aliases; then \
for ALIAS in `cat po/$*.aliases`; do \
mkdir -p share/locale/$$ALIAS/LC_MESSAGES; \
cp $@ share/locale/$$ALIAS/LC_MESSAGES; \
done; \
fi
satellite.png: satellite.svg
convert -transparent white -resize 11x16 -depth 8 $< $@
# This should work, but it doesn't get the colors quite right - so I manually converted with Gimp
# convert -colorspace RGB -transparent white -resize 256x256 subsurface-icon.svg subsurface-icon.png
#
# The following creates the pixbuf data in .h files with the basename followed by '_pixmap'
# as name of the data structure
%.h: %.png
@echo ' gdk-pixbuf-csource' $<
@gdk-pixbuf-csource --struct --name `echo $* | sed 's/-/_/g'`_pixbuf $< > $@
doc:
$(MAKE) -C Documentation doc
clean:
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
rm -f $(ALL_OBJS) *~ $(NAME) $(NAME).exe po/*~ po/$(NAME)-new.pot \
$(VERSION_FILE) $(HEADERS_NEEDING_MOC:.h=.moc) *.moc qt-ui/*.moc qt-ui/ui_*.h
rm -f $(RESOURCES:.qrc=.qrc.cpp)
rm -rf share
confclean: clean
rm -f $(CONFIGFILE)
rm -rf .dep
distclean: confclean
rm -f $(CREATOR_FILES)
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
release:
@scripts/check-version -cr $(VERSION_STRING)
git archive --prefix $(CAPITALIZED_NAME)-$(VERSION_STRING)/ \
--output $(CAPITALIZED_NAME)-$(VERSION_STRING).tgz \
v$(VERSION_STRING)
.PHONY: creator-files
creator-files: $(CREATOR_FILES)
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
$(NAME).files: Makefile $(CONFIGFILE)
echo $(wildcard *.h qt-ui/*.h qt-ui/*.ui) $(HEADERS) $(SOURCES) | tr ' ' '\n' | sort | uniq > $(NAME).files
{ echo Makefile; echo Rules.mk; echo Configure.mk; } >> $(NAME).files
Merge branch 'Qt' After the 3.1 release it is time to shift the focus on the Qt effort - and the best way to do this is to merge the changes in the Qt branch into master. Linus was extremely nice and did a merge for me. I decided to do my own merge instead (which by accident actually based on a different version of the Qt branch) and then used his merge to double check what I was doing. I resolved a few things differently but overall what we did was very much the same (and I say this with pride since Linus is a professional git merger) Here's his merge commit message: This is a rough and tumble merge of the Qt branch into 'master', trying to sort out the conflicts as best as I could. There were two major kinds of conflicts: - the Makefile changes, in particular the split of the single Makefile into Rules.mk and Configure.mk, along with the obvious Qt build changes themselves. Those changes conflicted with some of the updates done in mainline wrt "release" targets and some helper macros ($(NAME) etc). Resolved by largely taking the Qt branch versions, and then editing in the most obvious parts of the Makefile updates from mainline. NOTE! The script/get_version shell script was made to just fail silently on not finding a git repository, which avoided having to take some particularly ugly Makefile changes. - Various random updates in mainline to support things like dive tags. The conflicts were mainly to the gtk GUI parts, which obviously looked different afterwards. I fixed things up to look like the newer code, but since the gtk files themselves are actually dead in the Qt branch, this is largely irrelevant. NOTE! This does *NOT* introduce the equivalent Qt functionality. The fields are there in the code now, but there's no Qt UI for the whole dive tag stuff etc. This seems to compile for me (although I have to force "QMAKE=qmake-qt4" on f19), and results in a Linux binary that seems to work, but it is otherwise largely untested. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-05-18 05:01:41 +00:00
$(NAME).config: Makefile $(CONFIGFILE)
echo $(patsubst -D%,%,$(filter -D%, $(CXXFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_FLAGS))) | tr ' ' '\n' | sort | uniq > $(NAME).config
$(NAME).includes: Makefile $(CONFIGFILE)
echo $$PWD > $(NAME).includes
echo $(patsubst -I%,%,$(filter -I%, $(CXXFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_FLAGS))) | tr ' ' '\n' | sort | uniq >> $(NAME).includes
$(NAME).creator:
echo '[General]' > $(NAME).creator
ifneq ($(CONFIGURED)$(CONFIGURING),)
.dep/%.o.dep: %.cpp
@mkdir -p $(@D)
@$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) $(EXTRA_FLAGS) -MM -MG -MF $@ -MT $(<:.cpp=.o) -c $<
endif
DEPS = $(addprefix .dep/,$(C_SOURCES:.c=.o.dep) $(CXX_SOURCES:.cpp=.o.dep))
-include $(DEPS)