Consistently use for_each_dive (and use it correctly)

The way the macro is written there is no need to test the dive against
NULL before dereferencing.

Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Dirk Hohndel 2014-05-20 06:37:19 +09:00
parent b303f217a9
commit 09e7c61fee
5 changed files with 17 additions and 25 deletions

View file

@ -270,10 +270,8 @@ void MainTab::enableEdition(EditMode newEditMode)
// We may be editing one or more dives here. backup everything.
struct dive *mydive;
for (int i = 0; i < dive_table.nr; i++) {
mydive = get_dive(i);
if (!mydive)
continue;
int i;
for_each_dive(i, mydive) {
if (!mydive->selected)
continue;
@ -596,14 +594,12 @@ void MainTab::reload()
#define EDIT_SELECTED_DIVES(WHAT) \
do { \
struct dive *mydive = NULL; \
int _i; \
if (editMode == NONE) \
return; \
\
for (int _i = 0; _i < dive_table.nr; _i++) { \
mydive = get_dive(_i); \
if (!mydive || mydive == current_dive)\
continue; \
if (!mydive->selected) \
for_each_dive (_i, mydive) { \
if (!mydive->selected || mydive == current_dive) \
continue; \
\
WHAT; \
@ -836,10 +832,8 @@ void MainTab::rejectChanges()
}
struct dive *mydive;
for (int i = 0; i < dive_table.nr; i++) {
mydive = get_dive(i);
if (!mydive)
continue;
int i;
for_each_dive (i, mydive) {
if (!mydive->selected)
continue;