mifr/subsurface
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/subsurface/subsurface.git synced 2025-02-19 22:16:15 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Don't use negative gas index

Browse source 
This shouldn't happen, but in case we run out of gases we shouldn't use
the negative gas index (which is the error return of get_gas_idx()) for
the array. Let's fall back to the (incorrect) first gas.

Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Dirk Hohndel 2014-03-03 21:53:26 -08:00
parent d24d2288f3
commit 396106e307
1 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
planner.c
View file

@ -161,6 +161,10 @@ static int time_at_last_depth(struct dive *dive, int o2, int he, unsigned int ne
sample = &dive->dc.sample[dive->dc.samples - 1]; sample = &dive->dc.sample[dive->dc.samples - 1];
depth = sample->depth.mm; depth = sample->depth.mm;
gasidx = get_gasidx(dive, o2, he); gasidx = get_gasidx(dive, o2, he);
if (gasidx == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "cannot find gas (%d/%d), using first gas\n", o2, he);
gasidx = 0;
}
while (deco_allowed_depth(tissue_tolerance, surface_pressure, dive, 1) > next_stop) { while (deco_allowed_depth(tissue_tolerance, surface_pressure, dive, 1) > next_stop) {
wait++; wait++;
tissue_tolerance = add_segment(depth_to_mbar(depth, dive) / 1000.0, tissue_tolerance = add_segment(depth_to_mbar(depth, dive) / 1000.0,