From 988d6682f201ac39796d4f351340783a6c59b053 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dirk Hohndel Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:24:26 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Correctly recognize more OSTC variants as BLE Some OSTC 2 and OSTC Plus variants show 'OSTC+ xxxxx' as BLE name and we recognized this as OSTC 3 (but that one doesn't support BLE). With this we recognize these models as OSTC 2 (which is identical from a download perspective to the OSTC Plus) and both of those support BLE. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel --- core/btdiscovery.cpp | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/core/btdiscovery.cpp b/core/btdiscovery.cpp index a96deb6fd..055485a32 100644 --- a/core/btdiscovery.cpp +++ b/core/btdiscovery.cpp @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ static dc_descriptor_t *getDeviceType(QString btName) else if (btName.mid(4,2) == "s ") product = "OSTC Sport"; else if (btName.mid(4,2) == "4-") product = "OSTC 4"; else if (btName.mid(4,2) == "2-") product = "OSTC 2N"; + else if (btName.mid(4,2) == "+ ") product = "OSTC 2"; // all OSTCs are HW_FAMILY_OSTC_3, so when we do not know, // just try this else product = "OSTC 3"; // all OSTCs are HW_FAMILY_OSTC_3