mirror of
https://github.com/subsurface/subsurface.git
synced 2025-02-19 22:16:15 +00:00
Fix typo in saturation/desatureation rates
This patch eliminates the difference between the saturation and desaturation rates. This was probably once meant as a conservative measure but the desaturation rate was increased rather than the saturation rate (which is probably a typo, as reported by Stefan). Since there is no good basis for this anyway, this patch sets both factors to 1.0 (and if accepted the whole factor business should be removed). This makes our deco times slightly longer. But in the past, we had introduced a 1.2% fudge factor in the critical radius calculation to add conservatism and match the benchmark better. Removing this fudge factor brings us close to the benchmarks. Expected test values updated. Reported-by: Stefan <sjti@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dc55ee4a23
commit
bd89e33e76
2 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions
|
|
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
// Subsurface appears to produce marginally less conservative plans than our benchmarks
|
||||
// Introduce 1.2% additional conservatism
|
||||
#define subsurface_conservatism_factor 1.012
|
||||
#define subsurface_conservatism_factor 1.0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
extern bool in_planner();
|
||||
|
|
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct buehlmann_config {
|
|||
|
||||
struct buehlmann_config buehlmann_config = {
|
||||
.satmult = 1.0,
|
||||
.desatmult = 1.01,
|
||||
.desatmult = 1.0,
|
||||
.last_deco_stop_in_mtr = 0,
|
||||
.gf_high = 0.75,
|
||||
.gf_low = 0.35,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue