The name is a string containint date, time, depth and length. So it's
useful even with nothing else going on.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The dive parser should eventually be just a part of the program, not the
whole thing. So start preparing for that.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Show date, max depth, and time by default. The stuff that matters and
should always exist.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
.. and fix the 'duration' parsing: it can be either in seconds, or in
mm:ss format. Floating point doesn't make any sense.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This makes it much easier to see the duplicates, but more importantly,
we do need to actually save the dives off to do any real work with them.
Also, require a verbosity level of 1 (-v) to show all the samples.
While (-vv) shows unparsed entries.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
I think this gets me dates on all my dives. So now I could start
sorting them and removing duplicates.
But before I try to remove dups, I guess I should compare the
libdivecomputer ones against the suunto ones. Because I bet they have
various "interesting" issues like using Bar vs Atm etc.
"But XML is portable". Crazy people.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
.. which also showed that the sampletime thing had gotten a bit too much
copy-paste from the temperature parsing ;)
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Now that we actually parse some of the dives, don't spam stdout with the
list of stuff we can't parse by default.
Add a 'verbose' flag, which enables that output when set.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
.. nice compiler warning hidden by the crazy gcc pointer sign warnings
that nobody wants to see (yes, we really do want to do 'strlen()' even
on unsigned strings, don't complain, crazy bitch compiler).
So this also makes our CFLAGS set -Wno-pointer-sign.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
(ie all of them)
This also shows the type of entry, which makes it clear that I've
screwed up the sample matching. Oh well.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
.. but don't actually parse anything yet. But hey - now it tells you
how many samples it (hasn't) parsed.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Ok, so we have the dive split and the sample splits, so now we could
really just start filling in data.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Of course, now the problem is that the different XML files have
different node names, but at least we've turned it into a half-way sane
format, and have a nice callback place per value.
Soon we could use that to actually fill in useful information.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
They had multiple "root" entries (all called 'dive'), which makes baby
Jesus cry.
So just enclose them all in one root entry (called 'dives') that
magically turns it all into parseable xml.
Yeah, that really helps make the world a better place.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It only works for the Suunto "one xml file per dive" format, not for the
libdivecomputer one that just puts many dives in one file.
Maybe there is some way for libxml2 to handle concatenated xml files
(start again on errors), but I don't know it yet.
I need to get stinking drunk before I look at more xml mess.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
(and add a reminder of how they came to be)
Gaah. XML is *stupid*. It's not easy to parse for humans or for
computers, and some of these XML files are just disgusting. But maybe
they can be turned into something usable with libxml.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
