To make this class available from QMLManager, the run_ui()
function would create the object and then set a pointer in
QMLManager. It works, but is inconsistent with the rest of
the code. Therefore, make it a classical singleton class,
which is generated on demand.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
DiveListModel was one of those "special" singletons that could
be created explicitly with new. This would make sense if a
parameter were passed to the constructor. We only passed null,
so one might as well turn that into a classical singleton with
default constructor.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The model was initialized in the global run_ui() function.
Move that into the constructor of the class.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Owing to apparent QML breakage, a model-reset leads to the DiveDetail
page being reloaded for every dive in the list(!). Therefore, add
rows instead.
This leads to extremely subtle code, as it is now imperative that
the model has been properly cleared beforehand. Nevertheless, for
now we have to do this to fix a severe performance regression.
Fixes#2295
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Clearing the dive data directly in the core leaves us with an
inconsistent model. Therefore, clear via the model.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The way we handle singletons in QML, QML insists on allocating the
objects. This leads to a very idiosyncratic way of handling
singletons: The global instance pointer is set in the constructor.
Unify all these by implementing a "SillySingleton" template. All
of the weird singleton-classes can derive from this template and
don't have to bother with reimplementing the instance() function
with all the safety-checks, etc.
This serves firstly as documentation but also improves debugging
as we will now see wanted and unwanted creation and destruction
of these weird singletons.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Instead of converting the section-heading string to a trip-pointer
in QML and pass that to the tripTitle() and tripShortDate()
functions, pass the string and convert in C++ code.
Hopefully, this makes the code more robust.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The section heading in the QtQuick ListView has to be a string.
Therefore, we passed a pointer formatted using hexadecimal notation.
Later, that was converted back without being checked.
A very scary proposition, so let's pass unique integer trip-id instead.
This means that on converting back we have to scan the trip table,
but that is a very minor cost comsidering to the gained robustness.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Instead of looping over all dives and search the dive with the given
id, let the source model determine the index and map that. Thus,
we do only one mapping and don't generate a ton of DiveObjectHelpers.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Accesses were via DiveObjectHelpers. Provide a direct access to
struct dive *. Use this for the filter - there is no point in
mass generating DiveHelperObjects in the filter code.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In DiveListModel::data() a DiveObjectHelper was created for any
data-access. Create it only when a DiveObjectHelper is actually
returned.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since DiveListModel does not keep its own list of dives anymore,
insertDive() doesn't use the DiveObjectHelper argument. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The clear()/addAllDives() pair was bogus as the former didn't
clear the model (this is not possible anymore - the model
represents the core dive list) and the latter readded all
dives again.
Replace this by a reload() function.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Instead of keeping track of a list of DiveObjectHelpers, generate
them on-the-fly in DiveListModel. Thus, there is less danger of
model and core getting out of sync. On the flip-side, now the
DiveListModel and the DiveListSortModel might get out of sync.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
DiveObjectHelper is a tiny wrapper around dive * to allow access
to dive data from QML and grantlee. It doesn't have to be a
full-fledged QObject with support for signals, etc. Therefore,
turn it into a Q_GADGET based object. This allows us passing the
object around as object, not as pointer to DiveObjectHelper.
This makes memory-management distinctly easier.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We don't want to generate a DiveObjectHelper numerous times for
every item in the dive list. Therefore, return this data directly
from the model. In this case, don't remove from DiveObjectHelper,
as these data might be used by grantlee templates.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We don't want to generate a DiveObjectHelper numerous times for
every item in the dive list. Therefore, return this datum directly
from the model. In this case, don't remove from DiveObjectHelper,
as this datum might be used by grantlee templates.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We don't want to generate a DiveObjectHelper numerous times for
every item in the dive list. Therefore, return this datum directly
from the model. In this case, don't remove from DiveObjectHelper,
as this datum might be used by grantlee templates.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We don't want to generate a DiveObjectHelper numerous times for
every item in the dive list. Therefore, return this datum directly
from the model. In this case, don't remove from DiveObjectHelper,
as this datum might be used by grantlee templates.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We don't want to generate a DiveObjectHelper numerous times for
every item in the dive list. Therefore, return this data directly
from the model. In this case, don't remove from DiveObjectHelper,
as these data might be used by grantlee templates.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We don't want to generate a DiveObjectHelper numerous times for
every item in the dive list. Therefore, return this datum directly
from the model.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The canonical way of displaying lists in Qt is via models.
Thus, return the tripId directly from the DiveListModel instead
of going indirectly via a DiveObjectHelper. In the future, this
will allow us to make the DiveObjectHelper value-based, as it
is not generated numerous times for every list item.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
These properties are not needed anymore, because the full text search
was decoupled from the DiveObjectHelper.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
1) The full text search was looping over the DiveListModel when
it could simply loop over the core model. Do that instead.
2) Don't generate a DiveObjectHelper to do a full text search.
Currently this is harmless as the DiveObjectHelper is only
a disguised "dive *". But from a conceptual point of view,
it represents the full representation of a dive and we don't
want to generate that in a tight loop.
This will help in
1) Making the DiveObjectHelper a non-reference object.
2) Moving fulltext search to the core and thus making it available
to desktop and more performant.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Indexes go from 0 to count - 1. Thus, the comparison for invalid
indexes has to read ">= count", not "> count".
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
These functions were spread out over dive.c and divelist.c.
Move them into their own file to make all this a bit less monolithic.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The only external caller of add_single_dive() used it to append a
dive to the global dive list. Rename the function accordingly and
remove the index parameter.
The internal caller can use the local insert_dive() function, which
doesn't consider selection. That shouldn't be a problem, as the
caller is doing import.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
See https://www.kdab.com/goodbye-q_foreach/
This is reduced to the places where the container is const or can be made const
without the need to always introduce an extra variable. Sadly qAsConst (Qt 5.7)
and std::as_const (C++17) are not available in all supported setups.
Also do some minor cleanups along the way.
Signed-off-by: Rolf Eike Beer <eike@sf-mail.de>
This function was not used outside of divelist.c, therefore make it
local. Moreover rename it to add_to_divetable so that the name
is generic and can be generated by a macro.
Moreover, remove the special case idx = -1, which would determine
the insertion index. Instead let the single caller who used this
feature do this.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Desktop used the hidden_in_filter flag in struct dive, mobile
used its own vector plus a new showndives member in struct dive_trip.
Unifiy these to use the same core-facility, viz. hidden_by_filter.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
QML's ListView uses the "section" property to test if items belong to the
same section. Apparently, this must be a string and therefore we can't
pass e.g. a dive-trip object. Therefore a specially formatted string
was passed in, which was guaranteed to be unique (contained the dive-trip
pointer value) and the fully formatted trip-title and short-date.
The disadvantage of that approach is that the formatting is performed for
every dive and not every trip. Perhaps not a problem now, but it makes
it for example necessary to cache the number of filtered dives.
To be more flexible, pass in only the pointer value formatted as
hexadecimal string and provide a function to convert that string
back to a trip-pointer (in the form of a QVariant, so that it can
be passed to QML). Moreover provide two functions for formatting the
title and the short-date.
The three new functions are members of DiveListSortModel. This might not
be the perfect place, but it is easy to reach from the DiveListView.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The dives of each trip were kept in a list. Replace this by a
struct dive_table. This will make it significantly easier to
keep the dives of a trip in sorted state.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Whenever the filter changes, simply walk the filtered dive list and ensure
that we have the correct count for dives that match this filter.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The regular expression based generic filtering made things very slow on a cell
phone or other, slower device. With this the results seem more reasonable.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
[Dirk Hohndel: this is the starting point of my following commits, I decided to
leave it in place to give Jan credit for the work he did on
figuring out some of the plumbing needed to get things to work]
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
In order to trigger the redraw of an edited dive we need to make sure
the model realizes that it has been updated. So far the only way to make
sure this happens reliably appears to be to remove the item and
re-insert it. Seems weird, but with this the bug of not redrawing the
profile after an edit appears fixed.
Fixes#1419
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
helpers.h included qthelper.h and all functions declared in helpers.h
were defined in qthelper.h. Therefore fold the former into the latter,
since the split seems completely arbitrary.
While doing so, change the return-type of get_dc_nichname from
"const QString" to "QString".
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a somewhat hacky commit. For a very long time, the delete
from the divelist on mobile crashed. That is, not always for anyone,
but for me almost consistently. This commit tries to solve it.
I found that trying to save the delete immediately after removing
data from the underlying model seemed to cause the crash. Hacking
around, I found that a simple beginResetModel/endResetModel between
the delete of the underlying model data and actual save is
sufficient to solve the crash.
The big question is, why does this all work? I suspect some of race
condition between deleting model data, and giving the QML engine
the opportunity to do its thing.
This is also related to issue #311, but that is not implemented
here.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
When deleting a dive from the divelist model, also free the
pointed to DiveObjectHelper data. There seems no harm done
(other than a memory leak) by this missing free.
Found while (again) investigating the infamous crash occuring
when deleting a dive from the mobile app when deleting a dive
from the dive list.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
See issue #875. In hindsight the reason for this bug is easy to
understand. When updating a dive, the dive was first removed
from the model, and added in its new state again. This does seems
resonable, but the delete in the model causes the internal (QML)
state to be changed, and the previous state (like the currentIndex
that was pointing to the just deleted row, so that one is changed to
something valid internally) is not restored at recreation of
the edited dive. The QML engine has no way to understand that
the remove and subsequent add are in fact one atomic operation.
This can be solved by simply updating the underlying data in
place, and notifying the change using a dataChanged emitted
signal. The dataChanged signal takes care of the repaint of
the screen, and there is no need for removeRow/insertRow pairs.
Fixes: #875
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
This already takes into account which of those dives were selected.
Right now all we have is select all or none - this needs actual support
in the UI, but once that's there, it will just work (famous last words).
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Most of the time we are adding all the dives, so do this in a single model
operation. This makes the case when adding a single dive (in the undo delete
function) slightly more complicated, but that seems totally worth it for the
speedup in the common case.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>