This was used by the DiveComputerDialog, which does not exist
anymore. The new tab uses the function in the corresponding
sorted model.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Instead of modifying the device table directly, call the undo
commands. Moreover, don't keep our own copy in the mode - show
the original version. Connect to the appropriate signals.
This means that the calls from the DiveComputerManagement
dialog have to be removed, since this mode of editing is
not supported. The whole dialog will be removed in a future
commit.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
To implement undo-semantics, we want a longer-lived dive-computer-model
(currently, it is regenerated when the dialog is opened). Therefore, it
must be reloaded when the core data is reset. Do this like for other
models: listen to the dataReset() signal of DiveListNotifier.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
If we want to include dive computer names in the undo system,
there should be visual feedback on undo/redo.
This would mean opening the divecomputer dialog, which would
appear quite strange. Therefore, add a tab. This is not ideal,
but consistent with the dive site tab, which probably shouldn't
be there either. In the future, the UI needs some rethinking.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since we converted from QString to std::string, let's also use
std::vector instead of QVector. We don't need COW semantics
and all the rigmarole. Let's try to keep Qt data structures
out of the core.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Add a small proxy-model on top of DiveComputerModel so that clicking
on table headers makes the table sortable.
The UI feature here is not as important as the fact that the UI does
its own sorting and we can keep the device-table in the core sorted
differently.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We keep track of device, i.e. distinct dive computers with id in the core.
The corresponding code stuck out like a sore thumb. Firstly, because it
is C++. But more importantly, because it used inconsistent nameing conventions.
Notably it defined a "DiveComputerNode" when this is something very different
from "struct dive_computer", the latter being the dive-computer related
data of a single dive.
Since the whole thing is defined in "device.h" and the function to create
such an entry is called "create_device_node", call the structure "device".
Use snake_case for consistency with the other core structures.
Moreover, call the collection of devices "device_table" in analogy
with "dive_table", etc.
Overall, this should make the core code more consistent style-wise.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
core/device.h was declaring a number of functions that were related
to divecomputers (dcs): creating a fake dc for manually entered dives
and registering / accessing dc nicknames. On could argue whether
these should be lumped together, but it is what it is.
However, part of that was implemented in C++/Qt code in a separate
core/divecomputer.cpp file. Some function therein where only
accessible to C++ and declared in core/divecomputer.h.
All in all, a big mess. Let's simply combine the files and
conditionally compile the C++-only functions depending on
the __cplusplus define.
Yes, that means turning device.c into device.cpp. A brave soul
might turn the C++/Qt code into C code if they whish later on.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This reverts commit 1c4a859c8d,
where the override modifiers were removed owing to the noisy
"inconsistent override modifiers" which is default-on in clang.
This warning was disabled in 77577f717f,
so we can reinstate the overrides.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Commit df156a56c0 replaced "virtual"
by "override" where appropriate. Unfortunately, this had the
unintended consequence of producing numerous clang warnings. If
clang finds a override-modified function in a class definition,
it warns for *all* overriden virtual functions without the override
modifier.
To solve this, go the easy route and remove all overrides. At least
it is consistent.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The keyword "virtual" signalizes that the function is virtual,
i.e. the function of the derived class is called, even if the
call is on the parent class.
It is not necessary to repeat the "virtual" keyword in derived
classes. To highlight derived virtual functions, the keyword
"override" should be used instead. It results in a hard compile-
error, if no function is overridden, thus avoiding subtle bugs.
Replace "virtual" by "override" where appropriate. Moreover,
replace Q_DECL_OVERRIDE by override, since we require reasonably
recent compilers anyway. Likewise, replace /* reimp */ by
"override" for consistency and compiler support.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The list of known dive computers was stored in a multi-map indexed
by the device name. Turn this into a sorted QVector. Thus, no
map-to-list conversion is needed in the device editing dialog,
which distinctly simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Having subsurface-core as a directory name really messes with
autocomplete and is obviously redundant. Simmilarly, qt-mobile caused an
autocomplete conflict and also was inconsistent with the desktop-widget
name for the directory containing the "other" UI.
And while cleaning up the resulting change in the path name for include
files, I decided to clean up those even more to make them consistent
overall.
This could have been handled in more commits, but since this requires a
make clean before the build, it seemed more sensible to do it all in one.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Another attempt to make it easyer to create the mobile version of
Subsurface.
Signed-off-by: Tomaz Canabrava <tomaz.canabrava@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
