We currently carry two pressures around for all the samples and plot
info, but the second pressure is reserved for CCR dives as the O2
cylinder pressure.
That's kind of annoying when we *could* use it for regular sidemount
dives as the secondary pressure.
So start prepping for that instead: don't make it "pressure" and
"o2pressure", make it just be an array of two pressure values.
NOTE! This is purely mindless prepwork. It literally just does a
search-and-replace, keeping the exact same semantics, so "pressure[1]"
is still just O2 pressure.
But at some future date, we can now start using it for a second sensor
value for sidemount instead.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Some Petrel 2 computers are dual stack. We need to list the Petrel here as well
since the Petrel 2 actually identifies itself via BT/BLE as Petrel and we can't
tell them appart until after we started a download.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This is both correct (many Perdix support BLE) and necessary
as the Perdix AI identifies itself (sadly) as Perdix.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The adapted define was confusingly wrong. Apparently, the BUFSIZ
define was coming from some include file, and was dependent on
platform (Linux 8K, Andorid 1K). Simple rewrite to a new define
and a proper value for both Linux and Android. If 4K is big
enhough, is a little uncertain, as its depends on the read
behavior of all libdivecomputer parsers using this serial
BLE interface.
The buffer size needed (on read, as that is the most prominent
direction when interfacing with DCs) is (most likely) 2x the
maximum block the libdc parsers request at once. I did not
study all parsers, but the Shearwater parser request 20 bytes
at once (we know that from the 1 packet at the time read, we
had before). The OSTC parser request 1K blocks for data
that is longer than 1K (like profiles, header tables).
The 1K we had on Android was working for Shearwater,
Eon Steel, but not for OSTC,as its reads 1K at the time
at max, and overflowing the buffer.
So 32k or 64k seems way to big (as in, much bigger than
any libdc read).
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
No idea why this now shows up as an error in the iOS build.
We need to refer to the typedef, not the underlying struct.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Apparently, OSTC Sport has a BT name like OSTCs<space><serial>.
Small code addition to detect this properly. As long as we
do not have an improved way of detection. Notice that most of
the HWs use the same BT hardware, so simple detection on offered
services will not work.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
See also b409e9fc91 and 709c1df2af. The OSTC parser
cannot handle reads of single 20 byte BLE packages in serial mode.
Instead of doing a deeper down agressive read, we can read on
the serial level more subtile. As the parser is requesting a
specific number of bytes, we just read that number of bytes and
return them. As the 20 byte BLE packets do (obviously) not
align with the reading requirement of the libdc parser, a little
housekeeing needs to be done in between individual reads.
CAVEAT 1: In contradiction to 709c1df2af, this is supposed to
work for all parsers that properly specify the needed bytes to fetch.
CAVEAT 2: All above tested on Linux Desktop with bluez stack.
Subsurface mobile is step 2.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
Commit 709c1df2af introduced a hard blocking read for BLE devices.
This did break BLE reads from multiple DCs, and (in hindsight) was not
a correct implementation. It would require, for example, dynamic
read buffers as especially profile data grows with dive time, and
in addition, and more importantly, also the OSTC libdc parser cannot
process the entire profile of a dive at once (but likes to receive
it in 1K blocks). So, basically, it introduced issues, and did not
solve the OSTC read.
This commit reverts this hard blocking read (and as such will break
OSTC BLE reads). But it enables removal of the special cases for
the EON Steel and G2.
A next commit will solve OSTC BLE reads.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
Handle credits. Do not just ask for maximum credits all the time as this
will stop the download. Also do not let the credits go back to 0 (while
this might work, this is not tested). Getting back the 0 credits stops
the download, and even when it can be restarted, it is less efficient
(and not needed). Notice also that it takes some time before a grant
request is honoured. During testing I saw reception of up to 25 packets
between request and grant. So a lower bound for the request of
32 packets seems resonable.
One aspect the Telit/Stollmann TIO puzzeled me. Sections 4.1 and 4.2
both talk about credits, but my hyphothesis is that there are two
credits counters in play. One for traffic either way. This commit
only deals with credits granted by Subsurface to the OSTC to send
data. Credits granted by the OSTC to allow Subsurface to send new
commands is NOT part of this commit, and is seemingly not needed
in our scenario. As we only send new commands to the OSTC when
a previous one is finished (per HW's interface spec), the OSTC
does not run out of credits to receive commands.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
While it's nice to have the numerical model in the logfile,
on the screen the user wants to see the dive computer product
name. And none of those hex numbers that make the text so long
that it becomes useless.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This reverts commit ed43b5dced ("Add
support for tank sensor battery for Perdix AI") since a much better
solution to get to that information has been implemented in
libdivecomputer.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
We use a little script to create the code snippet. This script in return
relies on comments that were added to the latest libdivecomputer source
(in the Subsurface-branch).
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This is a bit awkward with a VENDOR event - but at the time the strings
are generated, we don't have the information, yet, that we need to
determine these values (we need the last sample parsed, but the strings
are created as part of the dive headers.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
subsurface/core/divesitehelpers.cpp: In member function 'virtual void ReverseGeoLookupThread::run()':
subsurface/core/divesitehelpers.cpp:128:12: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'class QDebug'
qDebug() << "no reverse geo lookup; geonames returned\n" << fullReply;
^
Signed-off-by: Alex Blasche <alexander.blasche@qt.io>
The current BLE read reads just one 20 bype packet. That packet size is set
in ble_serial_ops, so, without being able to test on anything other than
a OSTC3, I assume that this holds for other BLE DCs too. So, I think is
is weird that those interfaces work with the current read() of just one
packet at the time.
As we need a blocking read (at least for the OSTC parser), just read all
data that is available on the input. And when we think we are done, give
the QtEventloop control to see if there is more, and process that incoming
data as well. All this basically implements a blocking read.
CAVEAT 1: This might break the reading from the currently working BLE devices.
CAVEAT 2: With this, I still cannot read the OSTC3 completely. For
developers familiar with the HW transfer protocol: it just stops while
reading the first full dive (header + profile) command 0x66, despite
correctly reading about 5Kb of data before. For some
reason, I do not believe that this is related to this commit.
CAVEAT 3: All above tested on Linux Desktop with bluez stack, and
confirmed NOT to work on Android 7.1.2, build with Qt 5.9.0, And
yes, I know 5.9.1 recommended.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
1) As the OSTC sends data to the BLE central role (the SSRF client) over 2
characteristics, we have to filter the administrative credit data from
the actual dive data that it received. The characteristcStateChanged
function is adapted for this.
2) We have to be sure that the Terminal Client I/O is fully defined during
opening the connecton to the OSTC. From 6d505b24f0c15 we can see
that the last step in setting up the terminal interface is the grant
of credits. This is done by writing to the proper (the only one, with
id = 0x2902) descriptor of the credits RX characteristic. The here
added slot is triggered on the completion of write of credits marking
the final stage of the setup.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
The current "select the correct BLE service to talk to" is flawed.
It assumes that the first found non-standard UUID is the right one
and apparently it is for some DCs. But not for the HW devices.
The HW devices use a "standard" ie. approved by the Bluetooth
SIG, controller, that comes with a UUID that our code currently
considers standard so not to be the right one.
This (simple) commit selects the right service for HW. The UUID
is hard coded, and this is ok, because it is tied to the hardware
used by HW. Futher, it does not change anything for other BLE
devices.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
This initalizes the Terminal I/O client as described in paragraph 3 of
http://www.telit.com/fileadmin/user_upload/products/Downloads/sr-rf/BlueMod/TIO_Implementation_Guide_r04.pdf
This is for all Heinrichs Weikamp computers, that use referenced BT/BLE hardware
module from Telit Wireless Solutions (Formerly Stollmann E+V GmbH). The 16 bit
UUID 0xFEFB (or a derived 128 bit UUID starting with 0x0000FEFB is a
clear indication that the OSTC is equipped with this BT/BLE hardware.
Furthermore, most devices equipped with this BT/BLE hardware have BT addresses
starting with 00:80:25:...
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
This seems really long, but one user appeared to get a response after
almost 10 seconds. So going with 12 for some margin of error.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This should be much more robust in getting us the correct Bluetooth address
and the correct vendor / product for our selection.
When we pick a paired device, we extract the address right from its name.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This really doesn't help us as we can't associate a vendor/product with
devices we don't recognize, so we can't download from them, anyway.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
For DCs that support both BT and LE, allow the user to connect to both
interface layers. Maybe not usefull in the end (as BT is faster
than LE), but as long as BT on Android is WIP is it very useful
to be able to connect to the interface layer we like.
Just add it to the Paired Devices list twice. The normal way, and
the LE: prepend way.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
This really needs to be done differently - we need a structured way
to associate a transport mechanism with each of the dive computers
we support.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
