This does feel clumsy and complicated. This is a lot of special case
handling and a lot of boilerplate for something that really should be
quite simple.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
We had a couple of instances of names being incorrectly merged with their
group, this should handle that better. It's a bit of a big hammer to use, but
it seems to work (and it makes it easy to then git grep for cases that don't
use the new helper function.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
