Commit graph

13 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Berthold Stoeger
145f70aab5 Undo: implement split-out of dive computer
Allow splitting out a dive computer into a distinct dive. This
is realized by generating a base class from SplitDive.

This turned out to be more cumbersome than expected: we don't
know a-priori which of the split dives will come first. Since
the undo-command saves the indices where the dives will be insert,
these have to be calculated. This is an premature optimization,
which makes more pain than necessary. Let's remove it and
simply determine the insertion index when executing the command.

Original code by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>.

Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2019-04-04 09:38:12 -07:00
Berthold Stoeger
891fcbf520 Import: control process_imported_dives() by flags
process_imported_dives() takes four boolean parameters. Replace these
by flags. This makes the function calls much more descriptive. Morover,
it becomes easier to add or remove flags.

Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-01-19 13:48:17 -08:00
Berthold Stoeger
1cd0863cca Import: add add_to_new_trip flag to process_imported_dives()
If this flag is set, dives that are not assigned to a trip will
be assigned to a new trip. This flag is set if the user checked
"add to new trip" in the download dialog of the desktop version.

Currently this is a no-op as the dives will already have been
added to a new trip by the downloading code. This will be removed
in a subsequent commit.

Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-01-19 13:48:17 -08:00
Berthold Stoeger
ea40370389 Cleanup: remove explicit constructor of DiveListBase
DiveListBase had an explicit constructor that initialized the
"firstExecution" member variable. The latter was a development-
artifact that was never used. Remove the member and the constructor.

Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-01-09 20:58:04 -08:00
Berthold Stoeger
82c47bdd79 Undo: make dive-import undoable
On desktop, replace all add_imported_dives() calls by a new undo-command.
This was rather straight forward, as all the preparation work was done
in previous commits.

By using an undo-command, a full UI-reset can be avoided, making the UI
react smoother.

Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-01-09 20:58:04 -08:00
Berthold Stoeger
7df8d8c888 Undo commands: refactor dive-trip handling
Trips were added to the core with the first dive of that trip.
With the recent changes that keep trips ordered by first dive,
this became counter-productive. Keeping a consistent state at
all times would mean resorting the trip table for every dive
that is added.

Instead, add all dives to a trip and *then* add the trip to the
core. Change the data-structures to not register trips-to-be-added
with individual dives, but keep them in a separate vector for
each undo command.

Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-01-09 20:58:04 -08:00
Berthold Stoeger
b19adecb9f Undo: make adding of planned dive undo-able
Planned dives were still added by directly calling core code.
This could confuse the undo-machinery, leading to crashes.

Instead, use the proper undo-command. The problem is that as
opposed to the other AddDive-commands, planned dives may
belong to a trip. Thus, the interface to the AddDive command
was changed to respect the divetrip field. Make sure that
the other callers reset that field (actually, it should never
be set). Add a comment describing the perhaps surprising
interface (the passed-in dive, usually displayed dive, is
reset).

Moreover, a dive cloned in the planner is not assigned a
new number. Thus, add an argument to the AddDive-command,
which expresses whether a new number should be generated
for the to-be-added dive.

Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2018-10-11 16:22:27 -07:00
Berthold Stoeger
1afd295c41 Undo: use vectors for MergeDives and SplitDive
The MergeDives and SplitDive commands used addDive() and removeDive()
calls to manage their dives. Unfortunately, these calls don't send
the proper signals and thus the dive-list was not updated. Instead,
use one- and two-element vectors, which are passed to addDives()
and removeDives() [note the plural].

Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2018-10-11 16:22:27 -07:00
Berthold Stoeger
7067e33596 Undo: select dives after add, remove, merge, split dive commands
Select the proper dives after the add, remove, split and merge
dives commands on undo *and* redo. Generally, select the added
dives. For undo of add, remember the pre-addition selection.
For redo of remove, select the closest dive to the first removed
dive.

The biggest part of the commit is the signal-interface between
the dive commands and the dive-list model and dive-list view.
This is done in two steps:
1) To the DiveTripModel in batches of trips. The dive trip model
   transforms the dives into indices.
2) To the DiveListView. The DiveListView has to translate the
   DiveTripModel indexes to actual indexes via its QSortFilterProxy-
   model.

For code-reuse, derive all divelist-changing commands from a new base-class,
which has a flag that describes whether the divelist changed. The helper
functions which add and remove dives are made members of the base class and
set the flag is a selected dive is added or removed.

To properly detect when the current dive was deleted it
became necessary to turn the current dive from an index
to a pointer, because indices are not stable.

Unfortunately, in some cases an index was expected and these
places now have to transform the dive into an index. These
should be converted in due course.

Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2018-10-11 16:22:27 -07:00
Berthold Stoeger
96d8727399 Undo: use dive * instead of unique index in renumber-dives
Now, that pointers to dives are stable, we might just as well
use dive * instead of the unique-id. This also affects the
merge-dive command, as this uses the same renumbering machinery.

Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2018-10-11 16:22:27 -07:00
Berthold Stoeger
63b65a7e20 Undo: implement autogrouping of trips in DiveAdd
If the autogroup flag is set, search for appropriate trips in
DiveAdd() and add the dive to this trip. If no trip exists, add
a new trip.

Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2018-10-11 16:22:27 -07:00
Berthold Stoeger
ec7d85835f Dive list: implement proper Qt-model semantics for DiveTripModel
Previously, each dive-list modifying function would lead to a
full model reset. Instead, implement proper Qt-model semantics
using beginInsertRows()/endInsertRows(), beginRemoveRows()/
endRemoveRows(), dataChange().

To do so, a DiveListNotifer singleton is generatated, which
broadcasts all changes to the dive-list. Signals are sent by
the commands and received by the DiveTripModel. Signals are
batched by dive-trip. This seems to be an adequate compromise
for the two kinds of list-views (tree and list). In the common
usecase mostly dives of a single trip are affected.

Thus, batching of dives is performed in two positions:
- At command-level to batch by trip
- In DiveTripModel to feed batches of contiguous elements
  to Qt's begin*/end*-functions.

This is conceptually simple, but rather complex code. To avoid
repetition of complex loops, the batching is implemented in
templated-functions, which are passed lambda-functions, which
are called for each batch.

Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2018-10-11 16:22:27 -07:00
Berthold Stoeger
43c3885249 Undo: isolate undo-commands
This refactors the undo-commands (which are now only "commands").

- Move everything in namespace Command. This allows shortening of
  names without polluting the global namespace. Moreover, the prefix
  Command:: will immediately signal that the undo-machinery is
  invoked. This is more terse than UndoCommands::instance()->...
- Remove the Undo in front of the class-names. Creating an "UndoX"
  object to do "X" is paradoxical.
- Create a base class for all commands that defines the Qt-translation
  functions. Thus all translations end up in the "Command" context.
- Add a workToBeDone() function, which signals whether this should be
  added to the UndoStack. Thus the caller doesn't have to check itself
  whether this any work will be done. Note: Qt5.9 introduces "setObsolete"
  which does the same.
- Split into public and internal header files. In the public header
  file only export the function calls, thus hiding all implementation
  details from the caller.
- Split in different translation units: One for the stubs, one for
  the base classes and one for groups of commands. Currently, there
  is only one class of commands: divelist-commands.
- Move the undoStack from the MainWindow class into commands_base.cpp.
  If we want to implement MDI, this can easily be moved into an
  appropriate Document class.

Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2018-10-11 16:22:27 -07:00