On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org> wrote:
> Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org> wrote:
>>> Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org> wrote:
>>>>> I added a few test dives exported from other software (Dm3, DiveLog 5.08,
>>>>> JDiveLog 10.2 from Mac - last one doesn't parse because of encoding... Also
>>>>> a composed XML zip file from DiveLog isn't supported, yet)
>>>>> Find them under dives
>>>>
>>>> Now this gets interesting. Is there ANY logic in the units in the
>>>> dives/TestDiveDiveLog5.08.xml? It seems that some of the temperatures
>>>> are in C (Airtemp and Watertemp) and some in F (samples). Otherwise I
>>>> would guess we are talking metric here, but I do not see any specs
>>>> (another log I have seen from DivingLog had all the units in metric,
>>>> as far as I could guess). BTW is the Weight in kg or lb?
>>>
>>> I have purchased DivingLog and should be able to create any combination
>>> of data for the test file that we could possibly want. I'll do a set in
>>> a moment that describe what SHOULD be there in their notes, maybe that
>>> will clear things up.
>>>
>>> That said, I really want to release 3.0.1 in the next couple of hours,
>>> so this may have to wait for 3.0.2 (if we end up needing that) or 3.1.
>>>
>>>> The divelogs.de UDCF format looks like it shouldn't take long to write
>>>> support for. I'll look into it this evening.
>>>
>>> It is evening for you, right? No pressure, just making sure I understand
>>> what may be coming in in patches in the next hour or two
>>
>> I currently have one version of the DivingLog XSLT. So a bit of
>> verification and that could possibly be used as is. However, this
>> could use a bit more testing than a new support to make sure things
>> are not going to be any worse than they currently are.
>>
>> I have not started with the UDCF yet, but that could be reasonably
>> fast to implement. However, no guarantees. (And yes, it is evening for
>> me)
>
> I can hold off 3.0.1 a couple hours longer if that is a realistic thing
> to do. I don't see the UDCF as that important since we have a different
> format from them that we support. So I think the best possible DivingLog
> support would be my preference.
>
> I'll add a few more exported dives from DivingLog next (and fix the
> naming of the existing ones).
In that case, here is the DivingLog XSLT if anyone can give it a test.
miika
From 4a62058f4f6fd4780f04bce6e1fe45e20abcf33f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:46:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] XSLT for DivingLog
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Two XML files, one all imperial, one all metric
Quick inspection shows that there is no indication whatsoever on metric vs
imperial in the file. That is of course completely moronic and makes
automated import more or less impossible.
I also added a different zip file from DivingLog - quick analysis shows
that this is simply the corresponding xml file, wrapped in a zip
container. So this should be trivial to add.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-02-26 08:39:09 -08:00
Renamed from dives/TestDiveDiveLog5.08.xml (Browse further)
