These appear to be the only cases where we forgot to ensure data is
saved. And pastDiveData is currently not called as the UI to use it has
been removed.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The code was using the pre-editing dive site name, which appears
weird. Not sure if that was on purpose.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
QMLManager::checkLocation() would only return true if the
dive-site itself was changed, not if the dive-site was set
to a different site.
Thus, in some cases edit events could be lost.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Calling saveChangesLocal() seems like the right thing to do, but it
doesn't do anything useful if the dive list hasn't been marked as
changed. The correct helper function to call is changesNeedSaving()
which makes sure we save the changes and update all UI information.
[Berthold: since this removes the last QML caller of saveChangesLocal()
we can make that function private.]
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This way the launch screen is shown significantly shorter on a device,
and instead the user sees our progress notifications.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This test makes no sense on other platforms (and the log file text is
frankly confusing when not running on Android).
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
We have convinced ourselves that only the main thread will ever trigger
a save operation, therefore the locking is not needed (and it has
recently started to cause user problems where local changes aren't saved
to storage and get lost).
Fixes#2718
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
QML documentation recommends against using the cacheBuffer for longer
lists and doing more testing shows that this really doesn't help at all.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Small optimization that reduces the number of accesses to the underlying
model. Instead of evaluating the isInvalid member eight times per
delegate, we only check it once.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Without this check we'll show the 'Please tap the plus botton...'
notification during app initialization as we are showing the initial set
of messages - which makes no sense.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Instead of not showing a notification until after we are done loading
the data into our models, tell the user that we are about to do that.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Until the app is initialized, we have problems getting the 'floating'
passive notifications to show up and be useful. Instead update the user
by filling a text block on the otherwise empty initial page of the app.
Delay the switch to the dive list until the app is initialized and then
use the passive notifications again. While we are initializing also show
a busy spinner so the user doesn't think the app is hung.
As a side effect of this change, the dive list isn't shown until our
models are initialized. And strangely this causes every single possible
delegate to be instantiated. We can prevent that by not setting the dive
list model until after we are done setting up the model.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This simply passes the text to the existing notification text mechanism.
The call to processEvents() ensures that Qt processes the UI events
after we updated the notification and that the user gets timely updates;
otherwise the UI might look like the app is hanging.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
When editing the dive site of a dive, the dive-table of the
corresponding dive site was not properly updated by the undo
commands. Try to get this right.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This was triggered by a change in enabled, but what is really changing is
the visible property. This should work better.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Especially on smaller screens we had issues fitting this on the screen.
And it looks fine on larger screens as well.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This was using the myData alias that exists in the dive list but not on
the dive details. This might work (because the models both use the same
underlying base model), but given that we are using the currentItem of
this ListView, I'm guessing that this would just silently fail (maybe
with a warning in the log).
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
A second tap on the back button will then end add/edit or close the dive
details and get us back to the dive list.
This fixes an issue where tapping on back with the context menu open
would bring you back to the dive list with the context menu still open,
and because then change the text in the context menu as those are
designed differently.
Reported-by: Willem Ferguson <willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The
- mergeLocalRepo()
- openLocalThenRemote()
functions were not invoked from outside QMLManager.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
QMLManager::changesNeedSaving() behaves differently on iOS:
it only saves locally with saveChangesLocal(), whereas all
other OS save to cloud with saveChangesCloud(). Nevertheless,
even for other OS saveChangesLocal() is called even though
that will be called in saveChancesCloud anyway. Therefore,
compile the saveChangesLocal() call in changesNeedSaving
conditionally.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
At least in 4.9.3.1258/3.0.1 I was able to reproduce a situation where I
edit one dive, go back to the dive list, then tap on a different dive
and then the keyboard pops up, obscuring a big chunk of the screen.
This tries to make sure the keyboard isn't shown in dive view mode.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
There are two places where we try to prevemt unintended app exits.
Once, in the onBackRequested signal handler on the dive list. This was
missing special handling for the situation where one of the drawers was
open.
The second place is the onClosing signal handler in main.qml. Naively I
thought that this was enough to catch all cases where we were about to
exit the app, but apparently an explicit manager.quit() is a bit too
forceful and doesn't get to that signal handler.
With this commit we check for open drawers in both places. Belts and
suspenders, I guess.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
You can already get to the map by either clicking on the location text
or on the left action button. This third way to get there reduces the
available space for the location text, and can cause positioning issues
with very long location texts creating three or more lines of text,
which then overwrites the dateRow below.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The compiler complained that we were passing a float to the
QFont::setPointSize() function, which expects an integer.
Solve this by using the QFont::setPointSizeF() function.
This might introduce a user-visible change, albeit very unlikely:
We now may set the point-size to a non-integer number.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The compiler complains that members were initialized out-of-order.
Even though this is not an issue here it is correct to emit a
warning, since only then it is guaranteed that the objects are
destructed in reverse-order with respect to construction.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Some slots in QMLManager were not called from the outside, some
only directly from C++-code. Make the former private and the latter
public member functions.
The idea here is to document which functions are actually called
from the outside and which are called from QML or connected to
signals.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There appears to be no reason for two-phase initialization.
Let's keep things simple: let the constructor produce a
functioning object.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
According to the Qt-docs you *may* send the new values in the
NOTIFY signal of Q_PROPERTYs. However, since changes will lead
to a reevaluation of a whole expression, this argument will be
unused. All it does is make the code more verbose and brittle:
What happens if you send the wrong value?
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We have a singleton class ThemeInterface, which means that it
is global and exists only once. It's members are static, i.e.
also global. A message from the department of redundancy department?
In any case, that makes no sense. Let's just make these members
local to the class.
I would even rip out the whole singleton thing, since the object
is not accessed anywhere outside from QML. Let's keep it for now.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
An Android user might reasonably assume that they can use the back button to
close the global or context drawers. So act accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This should deal with the rather confusing 'No dive in dive list' shown
while loading and processing the dive list.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Since apparently the header property of the ListView isn't reliably
making sure that our filter input line is visible, let's move the filter
header to be it's own visual element and manually manage the
relationship between that and the ListView.
The obvious idea was to anchor the ListView to the bottom of the
filterHeader, but that didn't work in my tests. So instead we are using
the topMargin to make sure that there is space to show the header.
Because this re-indents the whole filterHeader, 'git show -w' gives a
much better idea what this commit actually changes.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Instead of the crude and error prone bool, let's just use the right tool
for this job.
In order to avoid issues with a goto across a mutex boundary, this
slightly restructures the code in one place - 'git show -w' makes it
clear that this is really rather simple in its changes.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
I'm suspicious that an issue that some people have seen around changes
not being saved is caused by our handling of alreadySaving.
When starting with Subsurface-mobile in no-autosync mode, we were able
to end in a scenario where alreadySaving was true, even though there
were no unsaved changes. And in that case no changes made during such a
session were saved unless the user forced a manual sync with the server.
This commit radically changes our approach to handling the flag. It
moves it right next to the actual calls into code that could modify git
storage, and ensures that the flag can never stay set.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This was disabled in the past because it was deemed to slow. A lot
of time has passed, since. Maybe on current phones / iPads this is
acceptable again?
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This adds a context menu entry for top level dives that allows the user
to create a trip for that dive.
Unfortunately this creates a new string to translate right before a
release...
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
When we start adding a dive, we actually create a diveAdd undo command
so we have a dive that the user can edit. Which means we need to undo
this action if we cancel.
Also, for a more consistent UI, we should pop the dive details page that
we used to edit this dive and bring the user back to the dive list.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
