Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct prefs
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct prefs
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
We can argue about any of the changes here, but they are the result of our
whitespace.pl script - so if any of this is offensive to you, part of the
resolution will be fixing the script...
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name> (from struct preferences>)
- signal function have <name>_changed (from struct preferences>)
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way SettingsObjectWrapper
handles it) secures the same storage name is used. Having the set/get/load/sync
functions grouped together makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
remove QSettings header file from qPref.h (which is included in many files)
to isolate the use of QSettings in the total system.
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name in struct preferences>
- signal function have <name in struct preferences>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way SettingsObjectWrapper
handles it) secures the same storage name is used. Having the set/get/load/sync
functions grouped together makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
ensure SettingsObjectWrapper load() loads all display variables.
Copy font setting code from SettingsObjectWrapper to qPrefDisplay
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
add the prepared class qPrefDisplay to SettingsObjectWrapper and thereby making it active.
As a consequence of the uniform naming standard desktop-widgets/preferences_defaults.cpp and
tests/testpreferences.cpp have been updated.
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
add canonical_version and mobile_version to qPref
Having a property in qPref, allows the use in qml, and prepare the
interface for qml testing.
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
add enum to qPref and remove elsewhere
update source core to reference qPref.
the enum cannot be in pref.h because it is to be used in qml and Q_ENUM
need the enum to be defined as part of the class
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
copy Display from SettingsObjectWrapper to qPref as its own class
file. Update Display to use a common load/sync scheme.
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name in struct preferences>
- signal function have <name in struct preferences>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way SettingsObjectWrapper
handles it) secures the same storage name is used. Having the set/get/load/sync
functions grouped together makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit are made to show the use of the low level LOADSYNC macros, which will
be used for special cases. This class is NOT linked into the live system.
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Remove cloud_storage_status from qmlprefs.h.
usage to qPref::
enum cloud_storage_status is not used from C, but only from C++, and
having the same structure defined multiple times is a maintenance
challenge.
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
add 2 header files and 1 cpp file (qPrefPrivate does not have an implementation)
The rewrite/consoliadation of SettingsObjectWrapper, qmlmanager, qmlpref and planner
needs a place to put common private parts (qPrefPrivate) and 1 common class (qPref).
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
