- standardise the naming;
- use it consistently;
- apply the 'samples < 50' only when putting manually added dives into
edit mode - everywhere else manually added dives should be treated as
such;
- do not show a warning before editing a manually added dive in planner.
Signed-off-by: Michael Keller <github@ike.ch>
The event names were registered in add_event(). However,
the undo system did not use that function, but add_event_to_dc(),
which takes an already allocated event.
That gave the following unfortunate situation:
Load a log without setpoint changes.
Add a setpoint change.
The setpoint change event type now was not registered and
therefore couldn't be hidden.
Admittedly, a subtle bug, but still a bug. Fix by registering
event names on event creation.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The eventname handling code was splattered all over the place.
Collect it in a single source file and use C++ idioms to avoid
nasty memory management. Provide a C-only interface, however.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
For reasons of symmetry (there is a is_manually_added_dc()
function), create a make_manually_added_dc() function.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This causes UI confusion. Notably we go into edit mode and
reduce the number of samples, leading to loss of information.
If someone really manually adds a dive with more than 50
samples, they should still be able to explicitly open the
dive in the planner.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We want to prevent the user from accidentally deleting a
cylinder with sensor readings. Therefore, we need such a
function.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
... it just causes problems later when we free them, since we don't do
any reference counting.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When we save the divecomputer data, we never actually save the serial
value as a field. We used to rely on saving the very dodgy 'deviceid',
and then look up the serial number from there. And that never really
worked reliably, but we didn't really notice, because we never really
_used_ the serial number anywhere.
The only place the serial number is actually reliably displayed is in
the "Extra data" tab, which contains the key value pairs, and that's
where the original dive download code got the serial number from.
So just parse that at load time too, the same way we parsed it at dive
download time.
In fact, do the firmware version the same way, and remove the code from
the downloader, since it too can rely on 'add_extra_data()' just picking
up the information directly.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We have this odd legacy notion of a divecomputer 'device', that was
originally just basically the libdivecomputer 'EVENT_DEVINFO' report
that was associated with each dive. So it had firmware version,
deviceid, and serial number.
It had also gotten extended to do 'nickname' handling, and it was all
confusing, ugly and bad. It was particularly bad because it wasn't
actually a 'per device' thing at all: due to the firmware field, a dive
computer that got a firmware update forced a new 'device'.
To make matters worse, the 'deviceid' was also almost random, because
we've calculated it a couple of different ways, and libdivecomputer
itself has changed how the legacy 32-bit 'serial number' is expressed.
Finally, because of all these issues, we didn't even try to make the
thing unique, so it really ended up being a random snapshot of the state
of the dive computer at the time of a dive, and sometimes we'd pick one,
and sometimes another, since they weren't really well-defined.
So get rid of all this confusion.
The new rules:
- the actual random dive computer state at the time of a dive is kept
in the dive data. So if you want to know the firmware version, it
should be in the 'extra data'
- the only serial number that matters is the string one in the extra
data, because that's the one that actually matches what the dive
computer reports, and isn't some random 32-bit integer with ambiguous
formatting.
- the 'device id' - the thing we match with (together with the model
name, eg "Suunto EON Steel") is purely a hash of the real serial
number.
The device ID that libdivecomputer reports in EVENT_DEVINFO is
ignored, as is the device ID we've saved in the XML or git files. If
we have a serial number, the device ID will be uniquely associated
with that serial number, and if we don't have one, the device ID will
be zero (for 'match anything').
So now 'deviceid' is literally just a shorthand for the serial number
string, and the two are joined at the hip.
- the 'device' managament is _only_ used to track devices that have
serial numbers _and_ nicknames. So no more different device
structures just because one had a nickname and the other didn't etc.
Without a serial number, the device is 'anonymous' and fundamentally
cannot be distinguished from other devices of the same model, so a
nickname is meaningless. And without a nickname, there is no point in
creating a device data structure, since all the data is in the dive
itself and the device structure wouldn't add any value..
These rules mean that we no longer have ambiguous 'device' structures,
and we can never have duplicates that can confuse us.
This does mean that you can't give a nickname to a device that cannot be
uniquely identified with a serial number, but those are happily fairly
rare (and mostly older ones). Dirk said he'd look at what it takes to
give more dive computers proper serial numbers, and I already did it for
the Garmin Descent family yesterday.
(Honesty in advertizing: right now you can't add a nickname to a dive
computer that doesn't already have one, because such a dive computer
will not have a device structure. But that's a UI issue, and I'll sort
that out separately)
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Since dive.c is so huge, split out divecomputer-related functions
into divecomputer.[c|h], sample.[c|h] and extradata.[c|h].
This does not give huge compile time improvements, since
struct dive contains a struct divecomputer and therefore
dive.h has to include divecomputer.h. However, it make things
distinctly more clear.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
