Calculating parameters when in the planner mode is necessary to display the correct ceiling.
Fixes#601
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
If we don't set first_ceiling_pressure at start of dive, a shallow ceiling can
be shown when it shouldn't be.
Fixes#584
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
... and reset deco information in profile ceiling computation.
The planner test then needs to know about the struct holding the deco
state.
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
We only cleared the first sensor data when we created new synthetic plot
info entries, because we only used to have one (well, we had the o2
data, but apparently nobody ever noticed that it didn't get properly
interpolated, probably because people who have CCR dives with o2
pressures are few, and the pressure drops are gradual anyway).
Clear all the pressure data, so that the interpolation code doesn't
think we have some existing real sensor data for the plot info entries
in between proper sample entries.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
We used to only show the first pressure we had, from back when we only
supported a single sensor.
Reported-by: Stefan Fuchs <sfuchs@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
So the manual gas pressure case keeps showing issues, and in many ways it
really is a fairly complex thing, since it needs interpolation of the
intermediate pressures - possibly over several gas changes.
So you might have beginning and ending pressures for one cylinder, but
then use another cylinder in between.
We've historically got all the code to do this, but the big rewrite for
multiple cylinder pressures didn't get all the details right, and so
here's a few more fixes for the case that was shown by a dive by Robert
Helling. Hopefully we're approaching the old code situation, except now
with concurrent gas pressure handling support.
Reported-by: Robert Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The core to plot manually entered pressures without any sample data did
the obvious thing: it ended the pressures at the end of the dive as
indicated by the last sample.
However, that obvious thing didn't actually work, because sometimes the
last sample is long long after the dive has actually ended, and we have
no plot_info data for that.
This depends on the dive computer used: most dive computers will not
report samples after the end (even if they may internally remember them
in case the diver just came up to the surface temporarily), but some
definitely do. The OSTC3 is a prime example of that.
Anyway, the code was fragile and wrong - even if passed a time past the
end of the plot_info data, "add_plot_pressure()" should just have
associated that with the last entry instead. Which also allows us to
simplify the whole endtime logic entirely, and just use INT_MAX for it.
Gaetan Bisson's test-case also showed another oddity: we would plot the
gas pressure even for cylinders that had no has use (ie beginning and
ending pressures were the same). That's kind of pointless in so many
ways. So limit the manual pressure population to cylinders that
actually have seen use.
Reported-by: Gaetan Bisson <bisson@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
"If it hasn't been tested, it doesn't work".
All my testing of the multiple sensor pressures have been with some
reasonably "interesting" dives: they actually *have* sensor pressures.
But that test coverage means that I missed the truly trivial case of
just having manual pressures for a single cylinder.
Because there's only a single cylinder, it doesn't have any cylinder
changes, and because there were no cylinder changes, it never filled in
the use range for that cylinder.
So then it never showed the pressure profile at all.
Duh.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The momentary SAC rate got broken by the multiple ressure handling too,
and always used just the first cylinder.
This uses the new "get_gasmix()" helper to see what you're breathing,
and will do the SAC rate over all the cylinders that contain that gas.
So it should now DTRT even for sidemount diving (assuming you had the
same gas in the sidemount cylinders).
NOTE! We could just do the SAC rate over *all* the gases you have
pressures for, and maybe that's the right thing to do. The ones you are
not breating from shouldn't have their pressure change. But maybe some
people add their drysuit argon gas to the gas list?
So this may need more work, but it's a step in the right direction.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
In commit e1b880f4 "Profile support for multiple concurrent pressure
sensors" I had mindlessly hacked away at some of the sensor lookups from
the plot entries to make it all build, and forgotten about my butchery.
Thankfully Jan and Davide noticed in their multi-cylinder deco dives
that the deco calculations were no longer correct.
This uses the newly introduced "get_gasmix()" helper to look up the
currently breathing gasmix, and fixes the deco calculations.
Reported-and-tested-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
Reported-by: Davide DB <dbdavide@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This finally handles multiple cylinder pressures, both overlapping and
consecutive, and it seems to work on the nasty cases I've thrown at it.
Want to just track five different cylinders all at once, without any
pesky gas switch events? Sure, you can do that. It will show five
different gas pressures for your five cylinders, and they will go down
as you breathe down the cylinders.
I obviously don't have any real data for that case, but I do have a test
file with five actual cylinders that all have samples over the whole
course of the dive. The end result looks messy as hell, but what did
you expect?
HOWEVER.
The only way to do this sanely was
- actually make the "struct plot_info" have all the cylinder pressures
(so no "sensor index and pressure" - every cylinder has a pressure for
every plot info entry)
This obviously makes the plot_info much bigger. We used to have
MAX_CYLINDERS be a fairly generous 8, which seems sane. The planning
code made that 8 be 20. That seems questionable. But whatever.
The good news is that the plot-info should hopefully get freed, and
only be allocated one dive at a time, so the fact that it is big and
nasty shouldn't be a scaling issue, though.
- the "populate_pressure_information()" function had to be rewritten
quite a bit. The good news is that it's actually simpler now, although
I would not go so far as to really call it simple. It's still
complicated and suble, but now it explicitly just does one cylinder at
a time.
It *used* to have this insanely complicated "keep track of the pressure
ranges for every cylinder at once". I just couldn't stand that model
and keep my sanity, so it now just tracks one cylinder at a time, and
doesn't have an array of live data, instead the caller will just call
it for each cylinder.
- get rid of some of our hackier stuff, like the code that populates the
plot_info data code with the currently selected cylinder number, and
clears out any other pressures. That obviously does *not* work when you
may not have a single primary cylinder any more.
Now, the above sounds like all good things. Yeah, it mostly is.
BUT.
There's a few big downsides from the above:
- there's no sane way to do this as a series of small changes.
The change to make the plot_info take an array of cylinder pressures
rather than the sensor+pressure model really isn't amenable to "fix up
one use at a time". When you switch over to the new data structure
model, you have to switch over to the new way of populating the
pressure ranges. The two just go hand in hand.
- Some of our code *depended* on the "sensor+pressure" model. I fixed all
the ones I could sanely fix. There was one particular case that I just
couldn't sanely fix, and I didn't care enough about it to do something
insane.
So the only _known_ breakage is the "TankItem" profile widget. That's
the bar at the bottom of the profile that shows which cylinder is in
use right now. You'd think that would be trivial to fix up, and yes it
would be - I could just use the regular model of
firstcyl = explicit_first_cylinder(dive, dc)
.. then iterate over the gas change events to see the others ..
but the problem with the "TankItem" widget is that it does its own
model, and it has thrown away the dive and the dive computer
information. It just doesn't even know. It only knows what cylinders
there are, and the plot_info. And it just used to look at the sensor
number in the plot_info, and be done with that. That number no longer
exists.
- I have tested it, and I think the code is better, but hey, it's a
fairly large patch to some of the more complex code in our code base.
That "interpolate missing pressure fields" code really isn't pretty. It
may be prettier, but..
Anyway, without further ado, here's the patch. No sign-off yet, because I
do think people should look and comment. But I think the patch is fine,
and I'll fix anythign that anybody can find, *except* for that TankItem
thing that I will refuse to touch. That class is ugly. It needs to have
access to the actual dive.
Note how it actually does remove more lines than it adds, and that's
despite added comments etc. The code really is simpler, but there may be
cases in there that need more work.
Known missing pieces that don't currently take advantage of concurrent
cylinder pressure data:
- the momentary SAC rate coloring for dives will need more work
- dive merging (but we expect to generally normally not merge dive
computers, which is the main source of sensor data)
- actually taking advantage of different sensor data from different
dive computers
But most of all: Testing. Lots and lots of testing to find all the
corner cases.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This is a very timid start at making us actually use multiple sensors
without the magical special case for just CCR oxygen tracking.
It mainly does:
- turn the "sample->sensor" index into an array of two indexes, to
match the pressures themselves.
- get rid of dive->{oxygen_cylinder_index,diluent_cylinder_index},
since a CCR dive should now simply set the sample->sensor[] indices
correctly instead.
- in a couple of places, start actually looping over the sensors rather
than special-case the O2 case (although often the small "loops" are
just unrolled, since it's just two cases.
but in many cases we still end up only covering the zero sensor case,
because the CCR O2 sensor code coverage was fairly limited.
It's entirely possible (even likely) that this migth break some existing
case: it tries to be a fairly direct ("stupid") translation of the old
code, but unlike the preparatory patch this does actually does change
some semantics.
For example, right now the git loader code assumes that if the git save
data contains a o2pressure entry, it just hardcodes the O2 sensor index
to 1.
In fact, one issue is going to simply be that our file formats do not
have that multiple sensor format, but instead had very clearly encoded
things as being the CCR O2 pressure sensor.
But this is hopefully close to usable, and I will need feedback (and
maybe test cases) from people who have existing CCR dives with pressure
data.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
We currently carry two pressures around for all the samples and plot
info, but the second pressure is reserved for CCR dives as the O2
cylinder pressure.
That's kind of annoying when we *could* use it for regular sidemount
dives as the secondary pressure.
So start prepping for that instead: don't make it "pressure" and
"o2pressure", make it just be an array of two pressure values.
NOTE! This is purely mindless prepwork. It literally just does a
search-and-replace, keeping the exact same semantics, so "pressure[1]"
is still just O2 pressure.
But at some future date, we can now start using it for a second sensor
value for sidemount instead.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This combines the display with EADD since this is the same
value with a different unit. And show it for air dives as
well.
Suggested by Jan Mulder & Anton Lundin
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
This appears to be critical for work of breathing so it might be
worthwhile to compute. So far only in infobox.
For background, see
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBajM3xmOtc
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
Not using lrint(f) when converting double/float to int
creates rounding errors.
This error was detected by TestParse::testParseDM4 failure
on Windows. It was creating rounding inconsistencies
on Linux too, see change in TestDiveDM4.xml.
Enable -Wfloat-conversion for gcc version greater than 4.9.0
Signed-off-by: Jeremie Guichard <djebrest@gmail.com>
Using gcc option "-Wfloat-conversion" is useful to catch
potential conversion errors (where lrint should be used).
rint returns double and still raises the same warning,
this is why this change updates all rint calls to lrint.
In few places, where input type is a float, corresponding
lrinf is used.
Signed-off-by: Jeremie Guichard <djebrest@gmail.com>
We have two prefernces determining the deco_mode (BUEHLMANN vs VPMB
vs RECREATIONAL): One for the planner (deco_mode) and one for
displaying dives (display_deco_mode). The former is set in the planner
settings while the latter is set in the preferences.
This patch clears up a confusion which of the two to use by introducing
a helper function that selects the correct variable.
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
Calculate gfline using the gradient factor that is set by the planner
preferences when in the planner, and by the general prefs when not in the
planner. This is achieved by doing the gradient factor calculation in dive.c,
where buehlmann_config is defined.
Previously, the gfline was calculated using the general preferences gfhigh and
gflow, even when in the planner.
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
We could create a plot_info data that didn't contain all the time slots
for the events fromt he dive computer, which would terminally confuse
the plotting of the event profile widgets because it couldn't match up
the event with the dive plot data model.
So for example, in DiveEventItem::recalculatePos(), when the code tries
to figure out the spot in the data model, it could fail, and then try to
hide the event (because without the data model information it doesn't
know where it should go). But that hiding would then not match the
logic in DiveEventItem::shouldBeHidden(), and the event would end up
being shown in the upper left-hand corner of the profile after all.
The reason the plot_info data wouldn't contain the time slots is that
the slots are allocated primarily for the sample data, and then the
events would be added in between sample data in populate_plot_entries().
But since we'd only add the event pointer *between* samples, that would
mean that events after the last samples would not get plot-info points
allocated to them.
That issue was exacerbated by how we also truncate uninteresting samples
at the end when some dive computers end up giving a long stream
(possibly several minutes) of "at the surface" events before they
finally turn off logging.
This makes sure that we take the event timestamps into account for the
"maxtime" calculation, and also that we finish populating the plot_info
data with any final event timestamps.
Now all the events will have a matching plot_info entry.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Make them use indices into the plot-info, fix calculation of average
depth, and fix and add comments.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The variables that control each CVA iteration should be declared at the start
of each loop so that the values are carried over from one iteration to the
next.
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
In our verision of VPM-B for real dives, we take as the deco time the
difference between the time of the deepest ceiling and the time when the
ceiling clears.
When the display of ceilings was set to multiples of 3m this was confused, as
the maximum finder had issues: First of all, it updated the time when the ceiling
was the same (which was almost always the case for stepped ceilings) but changing
>= to > was not enough, since then the first time a deepest stepped ceiling was
reached was used.
This patch uses the actual ceiling (not rounded to the next integer multiple of 3m)
for this calculation to get rid of this problem.
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
In commit df4e26c875 ("Start sanitizing gaschange event information")
back about a year and a half ago, I started sanitizing the gas switch
event data, allowing gas switches to be associated with a particular
cylinder index rather than just the gas mix that is switched to.
But that initial step only _allowed_ a gas switch event to be associated
with a particular cylinder, the primary model was still to just specify
the mix.
This finally takes the next step, and *always* associates a gas switch
event with a particular cylinder. Instead of then looking up the
cylinder by trying to match gas mixes at runtime, subsurface now looks
it up when loading the dive initially as part of the dive fixup code.
The switch event still has an a separate gas mix associated with it, but
this patch also starts preparing for entirely relying on the gas mix in
the cylinder itself, by starting to pass in not just the event but also
the dive pointer to the routines that look up gas mix details.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Having subsurface-core as a directory name really messes with
autocomplete and is obviously redundant. Simmilarly, qt-mobile caused an
autocomplete conflict and also was inconsistent with the desktop-widget
name for the directory containing the "other" UI.
And while cleaning up the resulting change in the path name for include
files, I decided to clean up those even more to make them consistent
overall.
This could have been handled in more commits, but since this requires a
make clean before the build, it seemed more sensible to do it all in one.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
