DivingLog seems to report cylinder start and end pressures in metric
format, but sample readings are in imperial in case user has selected
this unit. So we must convert the sample pressures in this case.
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com>
At least in some cases the maximum sample depth can be more than
recorded maximum depth on DivingLog XML export. Thus the maximum depth
is doubled for unit detection.
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Seems there is a different way to state O2 percentage in DivingLog.
This patch includes that format along with the previously seen one.
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Seems that we can detect the unit of samples from DivingLog import when
comparing the maximum dive depth to the maximum recorded sample depth.
If sample is bigger, it is recorded in imperial. Of course this relies
on the assumption that the max depth of dive is recorded in metric unit,
but that seems to be the case, at least in the sample received.
It really does not make any sense to have both units in use for one dive
without any info on the unit used. But since that is the case, let's try
to cope with it.
Fixes#316
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This should take care of locale caused problems when the input uses decimal
point but locale uses decimal comma. Also the sample I have of Suunto DM3
format weight is represented with comma instead of dot so converting that as
well.
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This fixes two bugs:
- we overwrote the max depth that we read from an XML file with 0 if there
are no samples
- we didn't parse the DepthAvg tag in the DivingLog XML
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org> wrote:
> Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org> wrote:
>>> Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org> wrote:
>>>>> I added a few test dives exported from other software (Dm3, DiveLog 5.08,
>>>>> JDiveLog 10.2 from Mac - last one doesn't parse because of encoding... Also
>>>>> a composed XML zip file from DiveLog isn't supported, yet)
>>>>> Find them under dives
>>>>
>>>> Now this gets interesting. Is there ANY logic in the units in the
>>>> dives/TestDiveDiveLog5.08.xml? It seems that some of the temperatures
>>>> are in C (Airtemp and Watertemp) and some in F (samples). Otherwise I
>>>> would guess we are talking metric here, but I do not see any specs
>>>> (another log I have seen from DivingLog had all the units in metric,
>>>> as far as I could guess). BTW is the Weight in kg or lb?
>>>
>>> I have purchased DivingLog and should be able to create any combination
>>> of data for the test file that we could possibly want. I'll do a set in
>>> a moment that describe what SHOULD be there in their notes, maybe that
>>> will clear things up.
>>>
>>> That said, I really want to release 3.0.1 in the next couple of hours,
>>> so this may have to wait for 3.0.2 (if we end up needing that) or 3.1.
>>>
>>>> The divelogs.de UDCF format looks like it shouldn't take long to write
>>>> support for. I'll look into it this evening.
>>>
>>> It is evening for you, right? No pressure, just making sure I understand
>>> what may be coming in in patches in the next hour or two
>>
>> I currently have one version of the DivingLog XSLT. So a bit of
>> verification and that could possibly be used as is. However, this
>> could use a bit more testing than a new support to make sure things
>> are not going to be any worse than they currently are.
>>
>> I have not started with the UDCF yet, but that could be reasonably
>> fast to implement. However, no guarantees. (And yes, it is evening for
>> me)
>
> I can hold off 3.0.1 a couple hours longer if that is a realistic thing
> to do. I don't see the UDCF as that important since we have a different
> format from them that we support. So I think the best possible DivingLog
> support would be my preference.
>
> I'll add a few more exported dives from DivingLog next (and fix the
> naming of the existing ones).
In that case, here is the DivingLog XSLT if anyone can give it a test.
miika
From 4a62058f4f6fd4780f04bce6e1fe45e20abcf33f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:46:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] XSLT for DivingLog
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
