Do a simple copy & paste followed by a simple search & replace
to generate cylinder undo commands from weight undo commands.
Obviously, this is still missing the necessary code to keep
the dive-data consistent after cylinder editing.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When editing the dive site of a dive, the dive-table of the
corresponding dive site was not properly updated by the undo
commands. Try to get this right.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Do this in analogy to other types. However, here we have to convert
from / to QString. We could do this in an even more general way
by using two templat parameters: one for the Qt type, one for the
core type and define conversion functions. However, let's not do
this for now.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Some dive-editing undo commands have trivial setter and getter
functions: they simply read and write a struct dive member.
Autogenerate these in a template to which we pass a pointer
to member as template argument.
For the invalid-flag we have to turn the edit command from int
to bool, since that is how the flag is store in the dive struct.
Sadly, quite a number of the setters do funky things and we
cannot autogenerate them.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Most edit commands derive from a common base class EditBase,
which declares a fieldId() virtual function that has to be
defined by the child classes. This is tedious. For some reason
the C++ makers refuse to allow "virtual member constants".
To make the code somewhat less verbose, create these functions
by a template. Of course, we could introduce the template
parameter directly in the EditBase class. However, that would
mean that the code in this base class is generated for every
single undo command. I'm not sure we want that.
This should als make it somewhat less tedious to create new
edit commands by copy & paste.
We could do the same for the fieldName. However, that is more
complicated for two reasons:
1) For historic reasons(?) C++ doesn't allow for string literals
as template parameters. Therefore, arrays-of-string would have
to be defined, which is not very nice.
2) We would have to make sure that these strings are recognized
by Qt's translation machinery and use the QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP
macro, which makes the whole thing even less attractive.
Maybe later.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In the mobile version of the dive-editing command, the fulltext
filter was not updated. Thus, when editing a dive while the filter
was active, the dive would disappear.
Unregister the old and register the new version.
Reported-by: Chirana Gheorghita Eugeniu Theodor <office@adaptcom.ro>
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When editing dives, the undo-command sends a filte changed signal.
The models catch the signal and check whether the filter status
changed.
The mobile-version of the dive-edit command simply exchanged the
dives. This could lead to inconsistencies when the filter flag
was overwritten. Therefore, make sure that the filter flag
is not overwritten by the dive-exchange.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The way inheritance is implemented for the undo commands confuses the Qt
translation tooling - with the result that the context assumed by the
tools used to extract the strings doesn't match the context calculated
at runtime - so all the translations for the strings in undo commands
fail (including creating proper numerus forms).
This change forces a consistant context tag, at the price of creating a
significant delta for the source strings (the strings themselves stay
the same, but the context for a lot of them changes). I am hoping that
Transifex is smart enough to automagically add the correct translations
for these, but I guess I won't know until I try.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
In edit commands, the fulltext might have changed and therefore
we have to update the fulltext index.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Grammar-nazi ran
git grep -l 'indexes' | xargs sed -i '' -e 's/indexes/indices/g'
to prevent future wincing when reading the source code.
Unfortunatly, Qt itself is infected as in
QModelIndexList QItemSelection::indexes() const
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
For many of the commands it is fairly easy to add information that makes
it easier to figure out what actually happened. That's especially true
for commands operating on dives. Trip and dive site edits haven't been
given these more elaborate undo texts (yet).
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Command that just swaps two dives. This is rather complex,
as for example a dive site might be created.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
At least in those cases where we are sending a divesChanged signal we can
easily check if the cache was properly invalidated. Of course this won't help
in cases where we don't notify the dive list about changes, either.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
In a total abundance of caution, make sure we don't exit the constructor
leaving fields uninitialized.
Fixes CID 351437
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
We relied upon the translators to remove the parenthesis in cases
like "Edited notes (%n dives)" for n = 1 dives. Dirk doesn't want
that. Therefore, do it in the C++-code.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Implement the EditWeight undo command. Since there is common code
(storage of the old weight), this creates a common base class for
RemoveWeight and EditWeight. The model calls directly into the undo
command, which is somewhat unfortunate as it feels like a layering
violation. It's the easy thing to do for now.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Instead of freeing internal data of the weightsystem structure,
call the free_weightsystem function (which has to be made extern
at first). This makes things more future-proof, should the
weightsystem struct ever be extended.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
To make things more future-proof, introduce an empty_weightsystem
constant. Replace explicit aggragate initialization of empty
weightsystems by this constant.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This one is a bit more complicated than weight adding, because the
multiple-dive case is not well defined. If multiple dives are selected,
this implementation will search for weights that are identical to the
weight deleted in the currently shown dive. The position of the weight
in the list is ignored.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Introduce an AddWeight undo command. This is modelled after the
numerous dive-edit undo commands. The redo and undo actions are
connected to the WeightModel via two new signals, weightAdded
and weightRemoved.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The file command_private.cpp had functions concerning selections
only. To make these functions accessible from outside the undo
machinery, turn it into a part of the core-library. Currently,
only C++ functions are exported. We might think about also
exporting a C interface.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Recently, undo of dive-replanning was introduced. Therefore,
it appears logical to do the same thing for editing of the
profile of manually added dives.
For now, use the same undo-command, just change the displayed
text from "replan dive" to "edit profile". Move the fixup dive
call into the undo-command.
Eventually, every action on the profile should be made undoable.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Connect the UI to the underlying dive structure. Enable proper initialisation
and management of star widgets while Information tab is active. Enable undo for
the addtional star widgets.
Signed-off-by: willemferguson <willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
In the future we might want to use undo-commands for mobile as
well (even if not implementing undo).
Therefore, move the undo-command source from desktop-widgets
to their own commands top-level folder.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
