It was never clear what was a pointer to a static string from
libdivecomputer and what was allocated.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
These can all just be local objects.
Also, don't overwrite them with 0. We later want to convert the
string to std::string, where this would be very sketchy.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The old code was leaking memory. Use std::unique_ptr<> for
ownership management.
This is still very primitive and divetags are kept during
application lifetime. There should probably be some form
of reference counting. And the taglist should not be global,
but attached to the divelog.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
printf() is a horrible interface as it does no type checking.
Let's at least use the compiler to check format strings and
arguments. This obviously doesn't work for translated strings
and using report_error on translated strings is dubious. But OK.
Had to convert a number of report_error() calls to supress
warnings.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This avoid memory-management troubles. Had to convert a few
of the parsers (cochran, datatrak, liquivision) to C++.
Also had to convert libdivecomputer.c. This was less
painful than expected.
std::string is used because parts of the code assumes
that the data is null terminated after the last character
of the data. std::string does precisely that.
One disadvantage is that std::string clears its memory
when resizing / initializing. Thus we read the file onto
freshly cleared data, which some might thing is a
performance regression. Until someone shows me that this
matters, I don't care.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
