Use the drop down for editing the tank use in the gas list in both the
equipment tab and the dive planner.
The tank use column is now available in the equipment tab for all dives
and not just CCR dives, as 'not used' is a valid entry in both cases.
However, if the current dive is an OC dive, only 'OC-gas' and 'not used' are
shown.
There still seems to be a problem that in some cases, when opening the
planner after selecting an existing CCR dive the drop down in the
planner does not list CCR gas uses - for some reason `displayed_dive`
does not seem to be updated correctly on opening of the planner. But I have not been able to
reproduce this consistently, and changing 'Dive mode' fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Michael Keller <github@ike.ch>
This causes UI confusion. Notably we go into edit mode and
reduce the number of samples, leading to loss of information.
If someone really manually adds a dive with more than 50
samples, they should still be able to explicitly open the
dive in the planner.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This used to be one of the tab-widgets, which was illogical
and caused confusion. Notably, erroneously clicking on the
tab header led to a reset of the dive selection.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Owing to bit-rot, the extradata tab was not disabled if no dive
is selected. The reason was that there was an additional tab
(dive-computers) that should not be disabled. However that
tab was removed and now the extradata tab was not disabled.
Fix this, but note that there is another of these 'parasitic'
tabs, that should be removed, namely the dive-site tab.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Also allow editing sensor on a cylinder with already attached sensor.
This will swap the sensor data with the cylinder that it is taking the
sensor data from, removing the need for adding an extra temporary
cylinder when swapping two sensors.
Signed-off-by: Michael Andreen <michael@andreen.dev>
Making this simply depend on Qt5 or Qt6 was short-sighted as work on QtLocation
upstream continues. Instead break this out as its own option.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The only things in display.h were profile related, so the
split between these two files is not comprehensible.
In fact profile.h includes display.h, because it needs the
struct defined therein. Let's just merge these two files.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The only caller misused this function to get access to the
current divecomputer. Remove it, since selection of the
current divecomputer is handled by the MainWindow.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There were only three users of that. For now do it inline, but
we may think about a separate function, which is only available
on desktop.
Moreover, add nullptr-checks, even if they are not strictly
necessary.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Add a column to the equipment table that shows if a sensor is attached to a
tank, or which sensors would be available to attach to a tank that currently
doesn't have a pressure sensor associated with it.
Changing the sensor assignement can be undone.
This column is hidden by default as this is a somewhat unusual activity.
Signed-off-by: Michael Andreen <michael@andreen.dev>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This file was so confusing: A tabwidget containing a layout
containing a tabwidget. This strange situation is probably
due to moving the multi-dive warning message.
Remove the file, there seems to be nothing of importance
in there. All the UI was moved to the individual tabs.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There was always this weird asymmetry that the "maintab" widget
is one of the tabs itself, whereas the additional tabs were
treated as extra-widgets. Turn the first tab into explicit
source files to make the distinction between container and
content clear.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When the user undos/redos the profile should update even
when in edit mode. This is a bit more complicated than
anticipated:
1) We should not do the update when emitting an undo command
from the profile. But we *should* update if it is an undo
command from the maintab (change depth/time).
2) The divepointsplannermodel has to be reset. Side note:
the code is truly abysmal as it sends numerous changed-signals.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Place undo commands for every change of the profile, not
only on "saving". Move the edit-mode from the mainwindow
and the maintab to the profile widget.
This is still very rough. For example, the only way to exit
the edit mode is changing the current dive.
The undo-commands are placed by the desktop-profile widget.
We might think about moving that down to the profile-view so
that this will be useable on mobile.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
These two actions were using the same command with a flag
controlling the name of the command, which is shown in
the undo menu.
However, the replanDive does much more (such as changing
the notes) and in the future we may want to be more
fine-grained with respect to profile editing. Therefore,
split these commands into two separate ones.
Moreover, make the editProfile command more flexible.
Pass an enum describing the action instead and also
a counter indicating how many points have been
moved or removed.
Finally, don't consume the input dive in the editProfile
command, because we will want to keep the original dive
while editing the profile.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In general, replace "dive master" by "dive guide".
However, do not change written dive logs for now. On reading,
accept both versions.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
User report: when switching focus between windows, the
cursor position gets lost. This is due to a note-edit
command being fired, which then overwrites the notes tab.
To prevent this, don't update the notes field when placing
a command. Moreover, generally don't update the dive
selection when placing a command as that also rewrites all
the values.
Should this be extended to other fields?
Fixes#3365
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
On the equipment tab, unused cylinders (automatically added,
no pressure data) could be hidden. This was implemented using
a QSortFilterProxyModel.
Apparently, it causes confusion if cylinders in the middle of
the list are hidden. Therefore, only hide cylinders at the end
of the list.
QSortFilterProxyModel seems the wrong tool for that job, so
remove it and add a flag "hideUnused" to the base model. Calculate
the number of cylinders when changing the dive.
This is rather complex, because the same model is used for
the planner (which doesn't hide cylinders) and the equipment
tab (which does). Of course, syncing core and model now becomes
harder. For instance, the caching of the number of rows was removed
in a37939889b and now has to be
readded.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The logic did not consider the WORKINGPRESS_INT and SIZE_INT
columns added in cb80ff746b.
By some unknown magic this worked by routing everything
through the CylindersModelFiltered model.
Let's fix it and explicitly ignore these columns. Put
the test whether a column should be ignored in a function
to avoid inconsistencies should new columns be added.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
CCRs are different. It does not make sense to compute
a depth dependent SAC. You could compute the rate of O2
consumption but even that is likely wrong (as O2 in the
diluent would enter that as well), so simply don't attempt
it.
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
The TabDiveComputer model won't work in the new world order, where you
can't even insert a new device entry without a nickname to be edited.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Thus, the membuffer data is automatically freed when going
out of scope - one thing less to worry about.
This fixes one use-after-free bug in uploadDiveLogsDE.cpp
and one extremely questionable practice in divetooltipitem.cpp:
The membuffer was a shared instance across all instances
of the DiveToolTipItem.
Remves unnecessary #include directives in files that didn't
even use membuffer.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
MainTab::updateDiveInfo() is not executed when in the planner.
To decide whether the application is in the planner state,
it queried the profile. Instead, query the DivePlannerPointsModel.
Currently, there is no autoritative carrier of that flag.
However, the MainTab has a dependency on DivePlannerPointsModel
anyway, and therefore this removes a dependency on the
profile. This brings us closer to a state where we can have
multiple profiles.
Ultimately, it is hoped that the whole check can be removed
at this place, making the point moot.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The accept / reject message is only shown in edit-mode, no
need to check it. This is a step in simplification / removal
of the edit mode.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
So far the profile operated on the global displayed_dive. Instead,
take the dive to be displayed as a parameter to the plotDive()
functions.
This is necessary if we want to have multiple concurrent
profile objects. Think for example for printing or for mobile
where multiple dive objects are active at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The profile must be replotted when the dive mode changes.
Weirdly, this was routed via the dive-information tab
(making it inherently non-mobile compatible). Detect
such a change directly in the profile.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The MainWindow has a function to replot the profile. Use that
instead of accessing the profile directly.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We now have three different things that are kinda like statistics:
- the summary tab (reasonably useful when looking at selected dives)
- the yearly statistics (Ctrl/CMD-Y)
- the full statistics (Ctrl/CMD-T)
I'd argue that's at least one too many. But I'm sure some people will disagree.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
So far, the PreferencesDialog emitted a settingsChanged signal.
This meant that models that listened to that signal had to
conditionally compile out the code for mobile or the connection
had to be made in MainWindow.
Instead, introduce a global signal that does this and move
the connects to the listeners to remove inter-dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This used to reload the completion models. Moreover, remove two
obsolete member-function declarations.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Instead of programatically reload the completion models, listen
to the relevant signals in the models. To that goal, derive all
the models from a base class.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In the main-tab, when changing tag, buddy or divemaster,
update the corresponding completion model.
This is a quick-fix and the wrong thing to do. It works only
if the currently shown dive is changed, which is not a given.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Qt's memory management scheme is completely broken and messes
with common expectations.
QObjects are organized as a tree. The children are destroyed
in the destructor of QObject. This means that they are destructed
after the destructor of the parent object has run and its
sub-object were destructed. Obviously, this makes no sense as
the child objects should be able to access their parent at
any time.
To restore the commonly expected deterministic order of
construction and destruction, one might simply do away with
Qt's silly object tree and organise things using classical
subobjects. However, that breaks with the Qt-generated UI
classes: The objects generated by these classes are *not*
destructed with the UI class. Instead, they are attached
to the widget's QObject tree. Thus these are again destructed
*after* the widget! Who comes up with such a scheme?
In our case this means that we cannot have models used for
TableViews as subobjects, because the TableView needs the
model to save the column widths in the destructor. Which,
as detailed above is called *after* the desctructor of the
widget! Thus, turn these models into heap-allocated objects
and add them to the QObject tree.
Funilly, this exposes another insanity of Qt's QObject tree:
Children are destructed in order of construction! One would
expect that if objects are constructed in the sequence
A, B, C one can expect that C can, at any time, access B and A.
Not so in Qt: The destruction order is likewise A, B, C!
Thus, take care to init the widgets before the model. Jeez.
Finally, print a warning in the column-saving code of
TableWidget, so that these kind of subtleties are caught
in the future.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The custom TableView widget saves the table width on destruction.
For that, it uses the "objectName()". Since the table of the
DiveComputerTab was simply called "table" in the UI file, the
widths were saved in that generic section. To avoid future
name-conflicts, rename the widget to "devices".
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Because of subsequent changes there is no clean way to just revert the changes
introduced in commit 8b36cf1051 ("desktop: offer different colors for info tab
titles"), so this manually removes the parts we don't need anymore.
This also restores a tooltip value that was inadvertantly removed in that
commit.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The preference setting seemed far too strange to do this. And not very user
friendly. So instead we figure out if this is a dark theme or not by looking at
text and background colors in the palette, and make sure we get notified if
that changes.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Instead of doing it just for the Information tab, do it for all of the tabs.
There's still room for improvement. But this certainly feels more consistent.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Adding a new virtual function to all of these classes may seem like overkill,
but of course the idea is that likely we'd allow similar changes to all of
them.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
