This is a messy commit, because the "qPref" system relies
heavily on QString, which means lots of conversions between
the two worlds. Ultimately, I plan to base the preferences
system on std::string and only convert to QString when
pushing through Qt's property system or when writing into
Qt's settings.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Not strictly necessary, but a "natural" thing to do in a classical
C++ code base.
Move the tiny trip-table into its own source file, since it also
has its own header.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the sorted_owning_table depends on the fact that
different elements never compare as equal, make the
comparison function safer in that respect. If all failes,
compare the pointers.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since struct divecomputer is now fully C++ (i.e. cleans up
after itself), we can simply turn the list of divecomputers
into an std::vector<>. This makes the code quite a bit simpler,
because the first divecomputer was actually a subobject.
Yes, this makes the common case of a single divecomputer a
little bit less efficient, but it really shouldn't matter.
If it does, we can still write a special std::vector<>-
like container that keeps the first element inline.
This change makes pointers-to-divecomputers not stable.
So always access the divecomputer via its index. As
far as I can tell, most of the code already does this.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
After all it doesn't access any dive_site structure.
Moreover, rename it, since we use mostly snake_case in core.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The divesite-helper.cpp only existed because C-string manipulation
was too tedious. Now that divesite.cpp is C++ anyway, the split
is not necessary anymore.
Moreover, return an std::string, since this is a core-function.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the taxonomy is now a real C++ struct with constructor
and destructor, dive_site has to be converted to C++ as well.
A bit hairy for now, but will ultimately be distinctly simpler.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
- standardise the naming;
- use it consistently;
- apply the 'samples < 50' only when putting manually added dives into
edit mode - everywhere else manually added dives should be treated as
such;
- do not show a warning before editing a manually added dive in planner.
Signed-off-by: Michael Keller <github@ike.ch>
The old code was leaking memory. Use std::unique_ptr<> for
ownership management.
This is still very primitive and divetags are kept during
application lifetime. There should probably be some form
of reference counting. And the taglist should not be global,
but attached to the divelog.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Mostly irrelevant std::move() stuff of copy-on-write Qt objects,
a few real bugs, a timestamp_t downconversion and some codingsyle
adaptation.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
An attempt at limitting accesses to the globals current_dive and
dc_number. These globals do not make sense on mobile.
The parent widget of the tab-widgets remembers the currently
displayer dive and dive computer and the individual widgets
access these values from there.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Make it possible for the individual tab-widgets to access the
parent widget. In principle this could have been done by
downcasting the pointer returned by parent(), but this makes
it explicit.
The goal here is to store information on the selection,
current dive, etc. without repeating it in every subwidget.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
On selection change, pass down selection (including current
dive and dc) to the tab widgets. Ultimately, this should
remove access to global variables. A number of new accesses
are marked as TODO. They shall be removed in due course.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This causes UI confusion. Notably we go into edit mode and
reduce the number of samples, leading to loss of information.
If someone really manually adds a dive with more than 50
samples, they should still be able to explicitly open the
dive in the planner.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Making this simply depend on Qt5 or Qt6 was short-sighted as work on QtLocation
upstream continues. Instead break this out as its own option.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
There was always this weird asymmetry that the "maintab" widget
is one of the tabs itself, whereas the additional tabs were
treated as extra-widgets. Turn the first tab into explicit
source files to make the distinction between container and
content clear.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
