Mostly trivial. Since now on editing the field is re-set, the
validation function becomes unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This was rather trivial and modeled after the previous edit
UndoCommands. Since this is the first time we're editing
integers a new constructor instantiation had to be added.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This one was trivially modelled after notes editing. Only difference:
the textChanged() signal was replaced by the editingFinished()
signal so that we're not generating undo-commands on every key-press.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Add a new UndoCommand for dive mode editing. This one is a bit
special, as the mode is associated with a dive computer (DC),
not a dive. Thus the edit command has an additional parameter,
viz. the index of the DC.
This does not fit properly to the EditBase class, as this class
isn't aware of additional parameters and therefore this parameter
is not sent via signals. At the moment this doesn't matter. In
any case, the semantics of editing are weird and therefore let's
do the simple thing (derive from EditBase) and let's see what
the future brings.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
To keep the UI in a consistent state, update the notes field if
it is changed by an undo command. To that purpose, add a new
signal to diveListNotifier with a list of dives and a field-id
as payload.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Implement a first rudimentary dive-editing command. The main code
resides in a base class Command::Edit, which calls virtual functions
to read / set the fields and extract the field name.
Implement an example: editing of dive notes.
This dose not yet update the UI on undo / redo.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
