Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rick Walsh
e47f62f869 VPM-B: Add more planner tests
Add more VPM-B planner tests.  The "expected" total run time is taken as the
total run time produced by the Fortran VPM-B program.  For all these tests, the
results are within two minutes, which is a good result, but most are classified
as a "fail".

Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-08-25 10:57:26 -07:00
Rick Walsh
3ea7ee1934 Test another VPM-B dive plan
This adds a test for 100 m for 60 min dive on trimix using VPM-B

Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-08-25 10:57:06 -07:00
Robert C. Helling
fbce8a0378 Add a test for the VPM-B mode of the planner
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-08-23 07:30:33 -07:00
Dirk Hohndel
35dc814105 Add simple test for the dive planner
This sets up a standard dive scenario (30 minutes at 260ft/79m, EAN36 and
Oxygen as deco gases, last stop at 20ft/6m) and calls the planner to set
up a dive plan given certain standard gases.

Instead of trying to verify the complete plans it checks that we switch to
the deco gases at the right depth and the complete duration of the dive
matches our expectation.

The test intentionally fails right now for imperial as we have the wrong
switch depth for Oxygen. See how useful tests are?

On the downside, the test does NOT produce the same plan as Subsurface
when I try to create a consistent setup for both - and I have not been
able to figure out why. There must be some other parameters that I'm not
setting, but I haven't identified them, yet. It's very small differences,
for example in the metric case the stops at 21m, 9m, and 6m are each one
minute shorter in the test than it what Subsurface calculates.

Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-07-05 09:42:38 -07:00