Since all code can now directly access C++ structures these
accessor functions were not necessary.
Split out the table from the filterconstraint source file
and include it directly into the divelog.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Having this as a pointer is an artifact from the C/C++ split.
The triptable header is small enough so that we can
include it directly
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Having this as a pointer is an artifact from the C/C++ split.
The divesitetable header is small enough so that we can
include it directly.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Not strictly necessary, but a "natural" thing to do in a classical
C++ code base.
Move the tiny trip-table into its own source file, since it also
has its own header.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a humongous commit, because it touches all parts of the
code. It removes the last user of our horrible TABLE macros, which
simulate std::vector<> in a very clumsy way.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There was a weird asymmetry, where the undo-commands would
register the fulltext index of the dive, but the core would
unregister the fulltext index in the "unregister_dive()"
function.
To make this more logical, create a "register_dive()" function
in core that does registers the fulltext index.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The dive_table will be converted into a table of owning pointers.
Since the trip has only non-owning pointers to dives, turn
its dive_table into an std::vector<dive *>.
Add a helper functions to add/remove items in a sorted list.
These could be used elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the sorted_owning_table depends on the fact that
different elements never compare as equal, make the
comparison function safer in that respect. If all failes,
compare the pointers.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This had to be done simultaneously, because the table macros
do not work properly with C++ objects.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since struct divecomputer is now fully C++ (i.e. cleans up
after itself), we can simply turn the list of divecomputers
into an std::vector<>. This makes the code quite a bit simpler,
because the first divecomputer was actually a subobject.
Yes, this makes the common case of a single divecomputer a
little bit less efficient, but it really shouldn't matter.
If it does, we can still write a special std::vector<>-
like container that keeps the first element inline.
This change makes pointers-to-divecomputers not stable.
So always access the divecomputer via its index. As
far as I can tell, most of the code already does this.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This allows us to use non-C member variables. Convert a number
of pointers to unique_ptr<>s.
Code in uemis-downloader.cpp had to be refactored, because
it mixed owning and non-owning pointers. Mad.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since everything is C++ now, we can use unique_ptr<>s. This makes
the code significantly shorter, because we can now use the default
move constructor and assignment operators.
This has a semantic change when std::move()-ing the divelog:
now not the contents of the tables are moved, but the pointers.
That is, the moved-from object now has no more tables and
must not be used anymore. This made it necessary to replace
std::move()s by std::swap()s. In that regard, the old code was
in principle broken: it used moved-from objects, which may work
but usually doesn't.
This commit adds a myriad of .get() function calls where the code
expects a C-style pointer. The plan is to remove virtually all of
them, when we move free-standing functions into the class it acts
on. Or, replace C-style pointers by references where we don't support
NULL.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a long commit, because it introduces a new abstraction:
a general std::vector<> of std::unique_ptrs<>.
Moreover, it replaces a number of pointers by C++ references,
when the callee does not suppoert null objects.
This simplifies memory management and makes ownership more
explicit. It is a proof-of-concept and a test-bed for
the other core data structrures.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the taxonomy is now a real C++ struct with constructor
and destructor, dive_site has to be converted to C++ as well.
A bit hairy for now, but will ultimately be distinctly simpler.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
A long standing issue: the dives_to_add, etc. tables need to be
manually freed. This kind of problem wouldn't arise with proper
C++ data structures.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Unfortunately Coverity doesn't understand that most Qt data
structures are copy-on-write. It's a mis-feature of Qt, but
it is the way it is. Thus, passing by value is not an issue.
Out of ca. 25 warnings only two were legit. Let's silence
the others by either std::move()ing or passing by reference,
as would be idiomatic C++, which Qt is not.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This tries to encapsulate the management of the current dive and
divecomputer in the selection code. The current dive is alreay
set by setSelection(). Add a new parameter to also set the
current divecomputer. If -1 is passed, then the current
computer number is remained. This will allow us to audit the code.
Because for now, the whole "current dive computer" thing seems
to be ill-defined.
This fixes a bug: the dive-computer number wasn't validated
when making a new dive the current dive. The new code has some
drawbacks though: when selecting a whole trip, the validation
will be called for all dives in the trip and thus the dive computer
number will depend on the dive with the lowest amount of dive
computers in the trip. This will need to be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The parser API was very annoying, as a number of tables
to-be-filled were passed in as pointers. The goal of this
commit is to collect all these tables in a single struct.
This should make it (more or less) clear what is actually
written into the divelog files.
Moreover, it should now be rather easy to search for
instances, where the global logfile is accessed (and it
turns out that there are many!).
The divelog struct does not contain the tables as substructs,
but only collects pointers. The idea is that the "divelog.h"
file can be included without all the other files describing
the numerous tables.
To make it easier to use from C++ parts of the code, the
struct implements a constructor and a destructor. Sadly,
we can't use smart pointers, since the pointers are accessed
from C code. Therfore the constructor and destructor are
quite complex.
The whole commit is large, but was mostly an automatic
conversion.
One oddity of note: the divelog structure also contains
the "autogroup" flag, since that is saved in the divelog.
This actually fixes a bug: Before, when importing dives
from a different log, the autogroup flag was overwritten.
This was probably not intended and does not happen anymore.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since there (currently) is no interactive widget on mobile, there
is no point in compiling it. This was a bit more complicated than
expected, since there were other source files (divehandler.cpp
and ruleritem.cpp) which reference ProfileWidget2 and therefore
need to be removed. Otherwise, the dreadful MOC produces unresolved
references.
We could now remove all the conditional compiles in
profilewidget2.cpp, but let's keep them for now. We might have
to readd a number of them later, when making the mobile-profile
interactive.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We no longer need the remove infrastructure, and the edit nickname function
becomes much more intuitive to use by passing in the dive computer for
which we want to create a nickname instead of the internal index into
the array of devices.
This also removes / simplifies the device list update signals in the
DiveListNotifier.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
When removing dives, the UndoCommands would keep track of the
shown dives. When adding, they were calling into the filter
instead. Let's remove this asymmetry.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In the list view two functions were still manually collecting
the selected dives. Use getDiveSelection() there as well.
Careful: that means that the check for dives that are already
outside of a trip now has to be done in the RemoveDivesFromTrip
command.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Add a general dives-imported signal for those cases where we
want to fully rebuild models, notably, the completion models.
The divesAdded signals are too fine, because they are sent
per trip and we don't want to reload these models multiple
times per import.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Annoyingly, the replacement has only been available since Qt 5.14.
To make the code less messy, implement our own stdToQt conversion helper.
Suggested-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Add a device_table parameters to Command::importTable() and
add_imported_dives(). The content of this table will be added
to the global device list (respectively removed on undo).
This is currently a no-op, as the parser doesn't yet fill
out the device table, but adds devices directly to the global
device table.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We used a typedef "filter_preset_table_t" for the filter preset table,
because it is a "std::vector<filter_preset>". However, that is in
contrast to all the other global tables (dives, trips, sites) that we
have.
Therefore, turn this into a standard struct, which simply inherits
from "std::vector<filter_preset>". Note that while inheriting from
std::vector<> is generally not recommended, it is not a problem
here, because we don't modify it in any shape or form.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When importing a divelog, import filter presets. If there are
equal names, import only if the presets differ. In that case,
disambiguate the name. This made things a bit more complicated,
as comparison of filter presets had to be implemented.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There is a number_of_computers() function which does
the same thing with two exceptions:
1) checks for null-dive
2) returns an unsigned int
Replace calls to count_divecomputers() by calls to number_of_computers().
In one case, the return type makes a different - add a cast to int there.
Ultimately, we should probably change the dc_number to signed int
throughout the code.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In analogy to dives add a selection flag for trips. The reason
being that search for a selected trip can be painfully slow when
we do it through Qt's proxy model.
Make sure to deselect trips when they are removed from the core.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This was used by the divelist to check wether a selection change is
programmatical or user-initiated. However, since there is only one
entry point for programmatical selection changes, this is not needed
anymore. Remove it - this removes an inter-module dependency.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This fixes a crash: when the undo commands removed a dive from
the list, the fulltext cache was not cleared. If now the divelist
is reset and then the undo-command deleted, deletion of the owned
dive tries to remove it's fulltext cache, which doesn't exist
anymore.
For reasons of symmetry, when readding the dive, its fulltext
has to be registered.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The way inheritance is implemented for the undo commands confuses the Qt
translation tooling - with the result that the context assumed by the
tools used to extract the strings doesn't match the context calculated
at runtime - so all the translations for the strings in undo commands
fail (including creating proper numerus forms).
This change forces a consistant context tag, at the price of creating a
significant delta for the source strings (the strings themselves stay
the same, but the context for a lot of them changes). I am hoping that
Transifex is smart enough to automagically add the correct translations
for these, but I guess I won't know until I try.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
For many of the commands it is fairly easy to add information that makes
it easier to figure out what actually happened. That's especially true
for commands operating on dives. Trip and dive site edits haven't been
given these more elaborate undo texts (yet).
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
There are two cases where dive-times are shifted: in an explicit
dialog and when editing the date/time of a dive.
In each of these cases, the selected dives were collected manually.
Instead use the getDiveSelection() function. Since this returns
a std::vector, change the argument of Command::ShiftTime() to
such a std::vector.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The DiveFilter class defined the showDive() function to test
whether a dive should be filtered or not. This was used in
DiveTripModel to loop over all dives or all dives affected by
an editing action.
This restricts us in how we do filtering: We can't use indexes
that give us directly the result. To make the filtering more
flexible, move the actual loops that do the filtering to
the DiveFilter class.
The undo-commands likewise called directly the showDive()
function to check whether newly added dives are shown.
Use the new interface here as well.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In moveDiveToTrip(), the dive was first removed from its old trip
and then added to the new trip. This function is also used to
remove the dive from its trip (by moving it to the "null-trip"
if you whish). Even in that case add_dive_to_trip() was called.
The only reason why this didn't crash is that add_dive_to_trip()
checks whether old and new trip are the same. This is the case
when adding to the "null-trip", since the dive was removed from
the trip just before.
To cut a long story short, to trust on add_dive_to_trip() not
crashing if moving from the null-trip to the null-trip is
way to subtly. If we remove a dive from its trip, don't call
add_dive_to_trip() in the first place.
Reported-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We tend to use lower-case filenames. Let's do it for these files
as well. Simple search & replace.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
