Fix bug introduced in 505e4e47eb.
Nobody complained, so not clear if that was user visible.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We do want the -Wfloat-conversion warnings where they point out
potential bugs. But they are very distracting when they are triggered by
floating point literals (which the standard defines as double) passed to
a function expecting float arguments.
The fact that Qt6 changes the arguments to all these functions from
double to float is... hard to explain, but it is what it is. With these
changes, for the majority of cases we create inlined helpers that
conditionally compile to do the right thing. And in a handful of other
cases we simply cast to float (and accept that on Qt5 this then gets
cast back to double... for none of these cases the potential loss in
precision makes any difference, anyway - which likely is why the Qt
community made the decision to change the type of the arguments in the
first place).
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The tissue percentages were realized as 16 independent polygons.
That didn't work at all with the new absolute scaling.
Reimplement the item and blast it onto a pixmap. Not only is
this artifact-free, it also should (hopefully) be quite a bit
more efficient than painting numerous lines.
In contrast to the old code, this does access the plot_info
structure directly instead of using the model. Not so much
for performance reason, but rather to make things more robust:
We have a strongly typed language. Why would we shoehorn data
through the weakly typed QVariant and mess with wierd
index-arithmetics. Makes no sense to me. Qt-model have to
be used for interfacing with Qt. They are terrible for
intra-application data transfer.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
