This part of the code had that horrible pattern, where reseting
the model would invalidate all pointers to the DiveTrip model.
Internalize these complexities in the MultiFilterSortModel.
All accesses are now performed via that proxy model.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The UI talks to the filter model. Therefore route clearing of
data through that model instead of accessing the source model
directly.
This will allow us to remove the DiveTripModel::instance()
function and makes control flow less "jumpy".
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The DiveListView caught signals from the DiveTripModel
with the corresponding indexes. However, the DiveListView
is actually connected to the MultiFilterSortModel and
thus has to translate the indexes.
Instead, catch the signals in the MultiFilterSortModel,
transform them and resend. Let the DiveListView get
its signal from the MultiFilterSortModel.
Yes, this makes things less efficient because there is
an extra signal. On the upside, the makes data-flow much
more logical. Selection will have to be fixed anyway.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The dive-trip models now send changed-events if the shown-status
changed. Thus, there is no reason to fully reset the filter on
filter changes.
Simply tell the filter that it has to react to changes of SHOWN_ROLE.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The way this was accessed via Qt's model semantics was horrible.
This gives arguably more readable code, since we don't have to
shoehorn things through QVariants.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Split out the actual filtering from the MultiFilterSortModel.
Create a DiveFilter class that does the actual filtering.
Currently, mobile and desktop have their own version of this
class, though ultimately we may want to merge them.
The idea here is that the trip-model and undo-commands have
direct access to the filter-function and thus can take care
of keeping track of the number of shown dives, etc.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The filter-model was catching dives-added / dives-deleted signals
from the models to keep track of the number of shown dives.
To simplify the data flow, do this directly in the undo-command.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We mark hidden/shown dives in the core but store the number
of shown dives in the MultiFilterSortModel. Move this datum
to the core for improved locality.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
To test whether an entry is a trip, we passed a pointer to the
trip through a QVariant and tested that for null-ity.
Passing pointers through QVariants has given us myriads of
problems in QML, therefore introduce a bool IS_TRIP_ROLE
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In MultiFilterSortModel::startFilterDiveSites(), the setting of the
dive sites to be filtered is done later in the code. Therefore,
remove the assignment in the first line of the function. Under
some circumstances, this would prevent a needed map reload!
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since changing the highlighting to use the selected dive, dive
sites with no dive were never highlighted in dive site mode.
Obviously, because there was no dive to be selected.
Therefore special-case all dive-site selection code to recognize
when we are in dive site mode.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since selection change doesn't to a full map reload, we have to
reload the map on filter changes, since the shown dive sites change.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We have a very fundamental problem with data-duplication in
core and qt-models. In a particular case, this led to an easily
reproducible crash:
1) An undo command moved the last dive of a trip to another.
2) When an undo-command removed the last dive of
a trip to a different trip, the dive was removed from the
trip in the core. Then, the model was updated.
3) That lead at first to a rearrangement of the trips, because
the trip with the added dive is moved before the trip with
the removed dive.
4) In such a case, the filter-model checks the visibility of
the trip.
5) Since the trip with the removed dive has no dives in the core,
visibility was determined as false.
6) From this point on the mappings of the QSortFilterProxyModel
were messed up. Accesses led to crashes. It is unclear
whether this is a Qt bug or only a QOI issue.
As a quick-fix, cache the visibility flag of trips directly
in the Qt-models. Don't set the visibility directly in the
core, but go via the Qt-models. Thus, a more clear layering
is achieved.
In the long run, we can hopefully get rid of the data-duplication
in the models.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
These functions were spread out over dive.c and divelist.c.
Move them into their own file to make all this a bit less monolithic.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Invalidating the filter can cause numerous selection-change notifications.
These cause a full UI reload. Therefore, go into "command" mode that was
implemented for the undo commands. Then, all selection-changes are
considered as "programmatical" and ignored.
At the end of filter invalidation, a filter-finished signal causes a
proper reload anyway.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When switching between the dive-site-table to the dive-site-edit
tabs, the filter would be set to a dive site. Usually, this would
be the same dive site as before. Nevertheless, this caused a full
map-reload. Detect if the dive-sites to be filtered are the same
and turn this operation into a no-op.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The dive-site-edit and dive-site-table tabs both put the filter
into a special dive-site mode. When switching between both, it
could happen that the one got its show befor the other got
its hide event.
Thus, the first would start dive-site filtering and the second
stop it. Now the app was not in filter mode even though it should.
To solve this problem, add reference counting for the filter's
dive-site mode. In both tabs call the enter/exit functions
on show/hide. In the dive-site-table tab, when the selection
changes, use a set function that doesn't modify the reference count.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When dive sites are edited, we shouldn't highlight the sites
of the current dive, but the currently edited site(s).
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When on the dive site tab or editing a dive site, we want
to show all dive sites so that the user can related different
dive sites. Therefore export a "in dive site mode" flag from
the filter model and don't filter in that case in MapWidgetHelper.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In the edit-dive-site tab the filter is switched to a particular
mode where only dives at that site are shown.
If we want to reuse this for the dive-site tab the mode has to
be extended to allow for multiple dive sites. This is trivially
done by replacing a pointer by a vector of pointers.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Instead of sending a signal when counts change, catching them
in the filter widget and update the window title there,
directly update the window title in the model. This removes a
signal/slot pair.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The filter code is strange: it actually only checks the
dive->hidden_by_filter flag. Thus, before propagating the dive
changed signal, this flag has to be updated. Do this in the
DiveTripModel. Ultimately, this should be refactored.
Moreover, if the filter-flag changed notify the frontend
of a changed trip so that the trip is hidden / unhidden.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Add a dive site table to each dive site to keep track of dives
that have been added to a dive site. Add two functions to add
dives to / remove dives from dive sites.
Since dive sites now contain a dive table, the order of includes
had to be changed: "divesite.h" now includes "dive.h" and not
vice-versa. This caused some include churn.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
All the field in the Notes Panel of the main window are now supported.
This needs some testing especially for the Notes field that may contain
markup. It appears ok to me for single term searches. One would like
to think about the default search option for the Notes.
There is a vertical spacer in the Filter panel that I moved downwards
and whose function I am not quite sure of.
[Dirk Hohndel: small adjustments]
Signed-off-by: willemferguson <willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This allows one to filter dives by divemode, e.g. by typing
"CCR" or "Open circuit" in the tags textbox of the filter tool.
Quite useful if one dives using more than one dive mode. For the
purpose of the filter tool only the dive mode attribute is added
to the list of tags for the specific dive being considered. The
tag list for the same dive (in the XML dive log) is not affected
in any way.
Provide for translation in alternative languages (Response to
bstoeger's suggestion).
Signed-off-by: willemferguson <willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za>
Add an additional mode to the tags, people and location filters: any_of.
Replace the original invert-bool by an enum.
Move the common code into a distinct function.
Reported-by: Willem Ferguson <willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za>
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Add negate buttons to the Tags, People, Location and Equipment
filters. Currently, if nothing is entered the filter is ignored
whether negate is on or off. One might think about filtering all
dives without tags, etc. instead.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Update the filter counts if dives were added removed by the
undo commands. The undo commands call into the filter model
at the right time so that hidden_by_filter is already set.
The filter model keeps track of the counts and emits a signal,
which is caught by the widget.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
1) Choose the correct conversion function for comparison.
2) Add a unit suffix to the fields.
3) Update the suffixes on change of preferences.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
On all (most?) places we use separate date/time fields for the time of a
dive, and we follow the setting from the preferences to format those.
Make the new filter widget consistent, with respect to the to and from
interval.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
If the user provides multiple tags, they probably want to search for
dive with *all* of these tags. Replace the convoluted loops by
std::all_of(). This makes it trivial to change logically-and to
logically-or: Replace std::all_of() by std::any_of().
Reported-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Commit 201f0c8f89 removed the dive-site
filtering. This is needed for dive-site editing: The list should only
show dives at the corresponding dive-site.
As opposed to the original code, only compare for the actual dive-site,
not for the name of the dive-site. The reason for comparing dive-site
names is unknown.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The filter treated unset air and water temperatures as 0 K, leading
to many dives not being shown. Don't filter on unset temperatures.
Reported-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In FilterWidget2::updateFilter() a new FilterData object is generated
and then copied onto the filterData member variable. Instead, modify
filterData directly. This seems also more logical from a semantic
point of view: Do we want to reset fields that were not set by the
user?
Contains trivial whitespace fix.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The DiveTripModel was used to represent both, trip and list views.
Thus many functions had conditionals checking for the current mode
and both modes had to be represented by the same data structure.
Instead, split the model in two and derive them from a base class,
which implements common functions and defines an interface.
The model can be switched by a call to resetModel(), which invalidates
any pointer obtained by instance(). This is quite surprising
behavior. To handle it, straighten out the control flow:
DiveListView --> MultiFilterSortModel --> DiveTripModelBase
Before, DiveListView accessed DiveTripModelBase directly.
A goal of this commit is to enable usage of the same model by mobile
and desktop.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The source-model was cached in MultiFilterSortModel. For simplicity,
remove that and simply access via DiveTripModel::instance(). There
is only one instance where the cached model was used: when comparing
items for sorting. Thus, in indirection is added in a "hot" path.
Nevertheless, this will dwarf against the cost of string comparison.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Wire up the needed code to filter the data in the myInvalidate
call. The data comes from the Struct FilterData and if any
of the test conditions on the filter function are false, the
filter will assume that the specific dive shouldn't be shown
Signed-off-by: Tomaz Canabrava <tcanabrava@kde.org>
The idea is that this struct will have all the needed data
that will be passed to the filter model. Everything that happens
on the filterwidget will fill out this struct, then forward it
to the model, that in turn will activate the filter hiding
some of the dives that matches on your divelist.
Signed-off-by: Tomaz Canabrava <tcanabrava@kde.org>
Just as we did for pointer to struct dive_site, make pointers to
struct dive and struct dive_trip "Qt metatypes". This means that
they can be passed through QVariants without taking a detour via
void *.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The dives of each trip were kept in a list. Replace this by a
struct dive_table. This will make it significantly easier to
keep the dives of a trip in sorted state.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The dive list was sorted using the default-sorter of
QSortFilterProxy model. This is mighty inflexible as it
considers only one column. This has the funky effect that
for rows with identical elements, the sort order depends
on the previous sorting.
Implement a lessThan() function in the MultiFilterSortModel,
which simply hands the sorting down to the actual model.
This might be considered a layering violation, but it makes
things so much easier.
Sadly, it seems like the column-to-be-sorted is transported
in the provided indices. Therefore, the comparison is chosen
using a switch for *every* comparison. It would seem much
more logical to set a function pointer once and use that.
Further investigations are necessary.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The data-flow from C-core to list-view is as follows:
C-core --> DiveTripModel --> MultiSortFilterModel --> DiveListView
The control-flow, on the other hand, differs as DiveListView
accesses both MultiSortFilterModel and DiveTripModel, whereas
MultiSortFilterModel is mostly unaware of its source model.
This is in principle legitimate, as the MultiSortFilterModel might
be used for different sources. In our particular case, this is
not so. MultiSortFilterModel is written for a particular use case.
Therefore, model control-flow follow after data-flow: Let MultiSortFilterModel
set its own source model and DiveListView access the MultiSortFilterModel,
which then manages its source model.
This is not bike-shedding, but will enable a more flexible and
higher-performance sorting.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
To test whether to show a dive, the UUIDs of the filtered-by
location and the dive-site of a dive were compared. Since UUIDs
are unique (as the name implies), directly compare pointers.
Note: this code comes from a time when the filtered-by location
was not a pointer, but a copy.
Moreover, the if tested first for the same name, then (logical-or)
for the same uuid. This makes no sense, as the same dive-site
implies the same name. This code likewise can be explained by
historic reasons: the filtered-by location may have contained
a different name. Swap the order of the conditions: first test
for the same object and only of the objects differ, test for
the same same.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
