This is a hairy one, because the sample code is rather tricky.
There was a pattern of looping through pairs of adjacent samples,
for interpolation purposes. Add an range adapter to generalize
such loops.
Removes the finish_sample() function: The code would call
prepare_sample() to start parsing of samples and then
finish_sample() to actuall add it. I.e. a kind of commit().
Since, with one exception, all users of prepare_sample()
called finish_sample() in all code paths, we might just add
the sample in the first place. The exception was sample_end()
in parse.cpp. This brings a small change: samples are now
added, even if they could only be parsed partially. I doubt
that this makes any difference, since it will only happen
for broken divelogs anyway.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since everything is C++ now, we can use unique_ptr<>s. This makes
the code significantly shorter, because we can now use the default
move constructor and assignment operators.
This has a semantic change when std::move()-ing the divelog:
now not the contents of the tables are moved, but the pointers.
That is, the moved-from object now has no more tables and
must not be used anymore. This made it necessary to replace
std::move()s by std::swap()s. In that regard, the old code was
in principle broken: it used moved-from objects, which may work
but usually doesn't.
This commit adds a myriad of .get() function calls where the code
expects a C-style pointer. The plan is to remove virtually all of
them, when we move free-standing functions into the class it acts
on. Or, replace C-style pointers by references where we don't support
NULL.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There were a number of free standing functions acting on a
dive-site-table. Make them member functions. This allows
for shorter names. Use the get_idx() function of the base
class, which returns a size_t instead of an int (since that
is what the standard, somewhat unfortunately, uses).
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a long commit, because it introduces a new abstraction:
a general std::vector<> of std::unique_ptrs<>.
Moreover, it replaces a number of pointers by C++ references,
when the callee does not suppoert null objects.
This simplifies memory management and makes ownership more
explicit. It is a proof-of-concept and a test-bed for
the other core data structrures.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This the C++ version of membuffer. Since everything is C++, it can
just be made the default.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the taxonomy is now a real C++ struct with constructor
and destructor, dive_site has to be converted to C++ as well.
A bit hairy for now, but will ultimately be distinctly simpler.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The old code was leaking memory. Use std::unique_ptr<> for
ownership management.
This is still very primitive and divetags are kept during
application lifetime. There should probably be some form
of reference counting. And the taglist should not be global,
but attached to the divelog.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Quite a bit of fallout in users of this structure.
Conveniently, since git-access.cpp is now C++ we can move
some helpers from the monstrous qthelper.cpp to git-access.cpp.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Return an std::string to avoid memory management headaches.
While doing that, convert time.c to C++ so that
format_datetime directly returns an std::string.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Simplifies memory management. Think about unglobalizing this,
once everything is in C++ so that we can put an std::string
into struct divelog.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
get_changes_made(), subsurface_user_agent() and normalize_cloud_name()
are only called from C++.
Avoids having to manually free the returned value and is therefore
more robust against leaks.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The code is now much easier to check for memory leaks,
since there are no explicit free()s. Yes, memory is not
released immediately, but that should be of no concern.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
