While not something that many will use, editing a dive on
Subsurface-mobile should not result in data loss.
This makes the divemaster field behave in the same way as the buddy
field with regards to multiple entries.
Fixes#1853
Signed-off-by: Joakim Bygdell <j.bygdell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
And use that to have our Travis build still work with the existing MXE
build container as well as the even older, pre-compiled MXE binaries
used in the windows build.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
That's the minimum platform that we have used for a while now,
corresponding to Android 4.1 and newer (i.e., quite ancient).
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
With a recent change to the qt-android-cmake project we are now using
the toolchain file bundled with the NDK, and that forces all cmake
modules to be part of the NDK tree - which breaks the way we find our Qt
installation. This is a hack to work around this as it undoes this
setting, which I'm sure is well intentioned to prevent host system
issues in this cross build scenario.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
There was a stray semi-colon on the beginning of a line in
DiveObjectHelper.cpp. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Usage of the flags expanded, selected and fixup was removed some
time ago. Remove the flags too.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The old code always sorted by "ascending" by default. But
because users typically want their new dives top, "ascending"
was defined for NR and DATE, such that it is actually descending.
Turn these around and intitialize these two fields as
default-descending.
This is possible using the Qt::InitialSortOrderRole role
in DiveTripModel::headerData().
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the QHeaderView of DiveListView is now the authority
over sort-column and sort-order, it makes little sense
to keep these as member variables. That would only risk
inconsistencies. Remove them and query the QHeaderView
instead.
We still need to keep track of currentLayout, as we
have to detect if it changes to change the underlying
model from tree to list or vice-versa.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The DiveListView code had a very fundamental problem with its
header: Each had its own idea of who is responsible for sorting.
Since we can't easily change QHeaderView, accept QHeaderView
as the authority on sort-column and order.
To make this possible, split the reload() function in two
distinct functions:
- reload() reloads the model and sorts according to the
current sort criterion.
- setSortOrder() tells the header to display a certain
sort criterion. If this is a new criterion, it will then
emit a signal. In this signal, resort according to that
criterion.
Thus, the actual sorting code has to be moved from the
headerClicked() to a new sortIndicatorChanged() slot.
Morover, the sorting of the QHeaderView has to be used.
Reported-by: Stefan Fuchs <sfuchs@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The DiveTripModels are sorted in *reverse* chronological order.
Therefore, when comparing a dive against a trip, the dive has
to be inserted if the dive has a *later* date. Change the
comparison accordingly.
Reported-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The generic addInBatches() function is used to add batches of
contiguous sets of dives to the dive-list models. The loop
searching for the end of the batch used the wrong index and
would therefore not properly cut the batches.
Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Commit 6dc1d239f8 introduced a
well-defined sort order in the case of equal contents. It changed
the code for sorting by date to simply use the order of the
source model.
BUT: The source-model was already sorted in descending order
on date. Thus setting the default order on descening by date,
the data was then presented as *ascending* by date.
Change this back to descending by always using default-ascending
in the filter model.
Ultimately, the source model should simply reflect the ordering
of the core-data (ascending on date), but such a change is
too invasive shortly before release.
Reported-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Add an "important" message that the support is experimental
and that the latest version of Windows 10 and drivers is needed.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123@gmail.com>
For unrecognized locales we use en_US by default. It makes much more sense for
South Africa to use en_GB.
Reported-by: Willem Ferguson <willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The dive list was sorted using the default-sorter of
QSortFilterProxy model. This is mighty inflexible as it
considers only one column. This has the funky effect that
for rows with identical elements, the sort order depends
on the previous sorting.
Implement a lessThan() function in the MultiFilterSortModel,
which simply hands the sorting down to the actual model.
This might be considered a layering violation, but it makes
things so much easier.
Sadly, it seems like the column-to-be-sorted is transported
in the provided indices. Therefore, the comparison is chosen
using a switch for *every* comparison. It would seem much
more logical to set a function pointer once and use that.
Further investigations are necessary.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
DiveListView::reload() was called for full reset of the dive list
and for changing the view (tree vs. lis) in DiveListView::headerClicked().
Since the latter does sorting by itself, a parameter "forceSort" was
introduced, which defaulted to true, but was set to false by
DiveListView::headerClicked().
To remove complexity, simply let DiveListView::headerClicked() set
the view by itself and remove tha parameter.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The QHeaderView::sectionPressed() signal was connected everytime
the list-view was reset. Likewise, setSectionsClickable() was
set to true everythime the list-view was reset.
Once in the constructor is enough.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The data-flow from C-core to list-view is as follows:
C-core --> DiveTripModel --> MultiSortFilterModel --> DiveListView
The control-flow, on the other hand, differs as DiveListView
accesses both MultiSortFilterModel and DiveTripModel, whereas
MultiSortFilterModel is mostly unaware of its source model.
This is in principle legitimate, as the MultiSortFilterModel might
be used for different sources. In our particular case, this is
not so. MultiSortFilterModel is written for a particular use case.
Therefore, model control-flow follow after data-flow: Let MultiSortFilterModel
set its own source model and DiveListView access the MultiSortFilterModel,
which then manages its source model.
This is not bike-shedding, but will enable a more flexible and
higher-performance sorting.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Even though the height was zero, when pulling down the dive list for refresh,
the filter input line would still be visible. With this fix it no longer is.
Also remove unused property.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
And fix a crash very similar to the previous commit. When trying to
save (to git) with an empty dive site, ssrf crashes.
Again, add a simple guard to prevent this.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
Import dives from a DC, and have ssrf started in verbose mode. After
downloading dives, hit ok, to add them to the dive list. This crashes
as we cannot get the uuid from the null dive site.
Added a simple guard to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
In commit 920eb7576f "dive_site *"
was included in Qt's "metatype" system to be able to pass it
through QVariants. One instance was forgotten and a "void *"
was passed in. On readout NULL was returned, which made it
impossible to add new dive-sites under certain circumstances.
Convert this one instance to a proper "dive_site *" QVariant.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
With the fixed sematics of get_gasmix to return the new gasmix for
the time of a gas switch (added comments to make this clear), in the
OTU calculation we need the previous gasmix for the interval up to the
current time.
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
This tests for the planner getting the gases in the
manually entered part of the dive wrong (as here: from
incorrect value returned by get_gasmix_at_time.
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
This fixes a subtle bug introduced in 5c4569247a which
unified two functions finding the gasmix at a given time
during the dive. There was a slight difference, though:
Does a gaschange exactly at that time count or not? For
the planner to work, the answer has to be in the affirmative.
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
Now that struct dive_site * is a proper Q_METATYPE it is not
necessary anymore to pass dive-sites as opaque uintptr_t types.
Simply pass a QVariants or directly via dive_site *.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since "struct dive_site *" is now a Q_METATYPE, the functions
MapWidgetHelper::centerOnDiveSite() and ::getCoordinates()
can directly get such a pointer instead of a QVariant. This
makes the code nicer to read.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There was this ugly pattern of passing pointers-to-dive_site via
a QVariant of void * type. This is of course inherently unsafe.
Pass these pointers using their proper types instead. This makes
it necessary to register them in Qt's meta-type system. Doing so,
fixes a bug: QML couldn't call into updateDiveSiteCoordinates()
because it didn't know the type and thus the coordinates of
the moved flag were not reflected in the divesite-dialog.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
To test whether to show a dive, the UUIDs of the filtered-by
location and the dive-site of a dive were compared. Since UUIDs
are unique (as the name implies), directly compare pointers.
Note: this code comes from a time when the filtered-by location
was not a pointer, but a copy.
Moreover, the if tested first for the same name, then (logical-or)
for the same uuid. This makes no sense, as the same dive-site
implies the same name. This code likewise can be explained by
historic reasons: the filtered-by location may have contained
a different name. Swap the order of the conditions: first test
for the same object and only of the objects differ, test for
the same same.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Replace the UUID reference of struct dive by a pointer to dive_site.
This commit is rather large in lines, but nevertheless quite simple
since most of the UUID->pointer work was done in previous commits.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is another case of a weird pattern where an object would
connect it's own signal to the slot of a different object.
There seems to be no reason why the former couldn't simply
call the latter.
Remove the [start|stop]FilterDiveSite signals of LocationInformationWidget
and call the corresponding functions of MultiFilterSortModel directly.
While doing so, replace the UUID argument by a pointer-to-divesite.
It will be converted anyway right at the beginning of the function.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
MapWidgetHelper::reloadMapLocations() used an array of uuids to
add dive sites to the map only once. Replace this by an array
of pointers. This is a small piece of a larger effort to remove
dive site UUIDs.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Replace UUIDs by pointers to dive-site in mobile code. In both
cases, the value is transported via a QVariant. The function
getCoordinatesForUUID(), which was only used from mobile, can
be replaced by a getCoordinatesFor() function taking a variant
supposed to contain a dive-site pointer. Likewise, the variant
of the centerOnDiveSite function is now supposed to wrap a
pointer-to-divesite.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There are two updateDiveSiteCoordinates() member-functions, viz.
in MapWidget and MapWidgetHelper. Adapt them to take a pointer
to dive_site instead of a UUID. This is part of an effort to
replace UUIDs by pointers.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Replace the uuid argument to MapWidgetHelper::enterEditMode() by a
pointer. Likewise, adapt the only caller prepareForGetDiveCoordinates().
This is a small step in a bigger effort to replace dive-site UUIDs
by pointers.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Replace UUIDs from LocationInformationModel and fix the fallout.
Notably, replace the UUID "column" by a DIVESITE "column".
Getting pointers through Qt's QVariant is horrible, we'll have
to think about a better solution.
RECENTLY_ADDED_DIVESITE now defines to a special pointer to
struct dive_site (defined as ~0).
This fixes an interesting logic bug:
The old code checked the uuid of the LocationInformationModel (currUuid)
for the value "1", which corresponded to RECENTLY_ADDED_DIVESITE.
If equal, currType would be set to NEW_DIVE_SITE. Later, _currType_
was compared against _RECENTLY_ADDED_DIVESITE_. This would only work
because NEW_DIVE_SITE and RECENTLY_ADDED_DIVESITE both were defined
as 1.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The diveSiteSelected signal of DiveLocationLineEdit had the dive-site
UUID as argument. But the receiving slot would not use that argument.
Remove this as a tiny step to remove the UUIDs alltogether.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
