This should never matter as we should never call undoit before redoit.
Extra ensurance that we don't access random data.
Found by Coverity. Fixes CID 350076
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
On merging, don't use the number of the first dive if it is 0.
Use the first non-zero number.
Fixes#2126
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since all commands now fully reset the selection, there is no point
in keeping track of whether the selection changed on addition or
removal of dives. This can be done in the function that sets the
selection.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Some commands tried to retain the current selection on undo/redo,
others set the selection to the modified dives.
The latter was introduced because it was easier in some cases, but
it is probably more user-friendly because the user gets feedback
on the change.
Therefore, unify to always select the affected dives on undo()/redo().
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the default view is batched by trips, signals were sent trip-wise.
This seemed like a good idea at first, but when more and more parts used
these signals, it became a burden. Therefore push the batching to the
part of the code where it is needed: the trip view.
The divesAdded and divesDeleted are not yet converted, because these
are combined with trip addition/deletion. This should also be detangled,
but not now.
Since the dive-lists were sorted in the processByTrip function, the
dive-list model now does its own sorting. This will have to be
audited.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When deleting a dive computer, don't just show the first
dive computer, but the next one in the list (if it exists).
Moreover, on undo jump to the previously shown dive computer.
Do this by keeping track of the before and after dive computer
number in the undo command.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This function clones a dive and clear out the old dive. This
corresponds to move semantics. Name the function accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is just minor fixes that are not user-visible:
Fix a few erroneous comments and a debug message. These are
copy & paste mistakes and mistakes introduced during code-
refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Instead of the elegant solution that just modifies the dive,
keep two copies and add either the old or the new copy. This
is primitive, but it trivially keeps the dives in the right order.
The order might change on renumbering the dive computers.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Recently, the undo code was changed to consider dive sites.
The undo code uses a DiveToAdd structure, which was extended
by the dive site to which the dive should be added.
The split and merge commands were not adapted and therefore
the dive counts of the dive sites were wrong after split
and merge.
Fix this by properly setting the dive site field and removing
the reference in the dive structure (in the split case, the merge
case already cleared the reference).
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In 5729f93e1f, the dive addition /
deletion code was simplified in that indexes were calculated on
the fly. This made it, in principle, possible to pass in dives
in any order.
But there was a small oversight: the recipients of the dives-added
and dives-deleted signals expect the dives to be sorted as in
the core list. Only then will the lists be consistent.
Therefore, sort the lists before adding / deleting dives.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When adding dives in an undo command, the index is saved in the
command. This seemed logical at first, because why calculate the
index more than once? But actually it made the code rather subtle
and brittle when multiple dives were added.
Moreover, this is a pointless optimization, as it doesn't optimize
the common case (only one execution).
Remove this for now and calculate the index on every execution. If
it ever turns out to be a bottle neck, it will be much more effective
to turn the linear search of the index into a binary search. A
further sensible optimization would be inserting in batches.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Properly implement the unsaved-changes flag(s). Since we currently have
two kinds of changes, there are two flags:
1) dive_list_changed in divelist.c marks non-undoable changes. This flag
is only cleared on save or load.
2) QUndoStack::isClean() is used to determine the state of undoable
changes. Every time the user returns to the state where they saved,
this flag is cleared.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Instead of letting the user edit the fields before adding a dive,
simply add an empty dive. Thus, the ADD mode of the main tab can
be removed.
Constructing a new dive with default-depth and making sure that
the dive is displayed correctly is very subtle. This all needs
to be detangled in due course.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Undo of editing should probably also restore the old selection and
current dive. Therefore, move the functions that set and restore the
selection and the current dive from the command_divelist.cpp into the
command_private.cpp translation unit.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The dive list was not updated automatically when an edit command was
executed. There was already a signal to do that, viz. divesChanged().
But that signal worked by-trip and didn't have a dive-field specifier.
The edit-commands used the divesEdited() signal that isn't by-trip
but has a dive-field specifier.
Unify these two signals to be by-trip and with dive-field specifier.
This needs common code to generate the by-trip list that is moved to
a command_private.h header.
Since there might now be multiple signals (one per trip) actually
check in the main-tab whether the current trip is affected to
avoid multiple update of fields. This has the positive(?) effect
of not doing any update if the current dive isn't changed.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is different from the other editing commands, because
date and time editing may change the order of the dive list.
Therefore, this uses an already implemented dive list command.
The command is extended to send a divesEdited() signal.
This signal and the divesChanged() signal, which is used by
the dive list, will be unified in a later commit.
Update of the graphics is now not done via signals, a direct
call is performed in MainTab::divesEdited(). This simplifies
things.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Introduce two DiveListNotifier signals which are sent by
the undo commands if dives are added to / removed from the
core.
The signal has the dive site and the index in the global
dive site table as payload. Thus, the model has only to
remove the appropriate rows.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
For consistency with remove_dive(). Moreover, swap parameter order
in remove_dive() so that both functions use the same parameter order.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Add a new signal to DiveListNotifier. Send signal if dives are
added or removed and therefore the dive count of a dive site
changes. The dive sites are collected and the signal is sent
at the end of the command.
Add code to update the table view.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Instead of setting dive->dive_site directly, call the
add_dive_to_dive_site() and unregister_dive_from_dive_site()
functions. In the parser this turned out to be a bit tricky.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
As opposed to dive trips, dive sites were always directly added
to the global table, even on import. Instead, parse the divesites
into a distinct table and merge them on import.
Currently, this does not do any merging of dive sites, i.e. dive
sites are considered as either equal or different. Nevertheless,
merging of data should be rather easy to implement and simply
follow the code of the dive merging.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Allow splitting out a dive computer into a distinct dive. This
is realized by generating a base class from SplitDive.
This turned out to be more cumbersome than expected: we don't
know a-priori which of the split dives will come first. Since
the undo-command saves the indices where the dives will be insert,
these have to be calculated. This is an premature optimization,
which makes more pain than necessary. Let's remove it and
simply determine the insertion index when executing the command.
Original code by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
6bf4120dbb replaced the trip flag by
a notrip boolean. This was supposed to signal that the user removed
the dive from a trip and therefore it shouldn't be autogrouped again.
Sadly, the commit removed the feature. Reinstate it.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Update the filter counts if dives were added removed by the
undo commands. The undo commands call into the filter model
at the right time so that hidden_by_filter is already set.
The filter model keeps track of the counts and emits a signal,
which is caught by the widget.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
process_imported_dives() takes four boolean parameters. Replace these
by flags. This makes the function calls much more descriptive. Morover,
it becomes easier to add or remove flags.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
If this flag is set, dives that are not assigned to a trip will
be assigned to a new trip. This flag is set if the user checked
"add to new trip" in the download dialog of the desktop version.
Currently this is a no-op as the dives will already have been
added to a new trip by the downloading code. This will be removed
in a subsequent commit.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The logic in process_imported_dives() was faulty: Dives are merged
trip-wise in a loop. But if only autogenerated trips were supposed
to be merged, the trip would not be added.
Change the logic to always add the trip if it is not merged. To make
the loop easier to read, factor out the merge-trip-into-existing-trips
logic into a separate function.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
DiveListBase had an explicit constructor that initialized the
"firstExecution" member variable. The latter was a development-
artifact that was never used. Remove the member and the constructor.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
On desktop, replace all add_imported_dives() calls by a new undo-command.
This was rather straight forward, as all the preparation work was done
in previous commits.
By using an undo-command, a full UI-reset can be avoided, making the UI
react smoother.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Currently trips are added to the global trip table. If we want to
make dive-import undoable, we should be able to parse trips of a
log-file into a distinct table. Therefore, add a trip_table
parameter to
- insert_trip()
- create_and_hookup_trip_from_dive()
- autogroup_dives()
- unregister_trip()
- remove_dive_from_trip()
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Trips were added to the core with the first dive of that trip.
With the recent changes that keep trips ordered by first dive,
this became counter-productive. Keeping a consistent state at
all times would mean resorting the trip table for every dive
that is added.
Instead, add all dives to a trip and *then* add the trip to the
core. Change the data-structures to not register trips-to-be-added
with individual dives, but keep them in a separate vector for
each undo command.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Currently, all trips are kept in a linked list. Replace the list
by a table in analogy to dive_table. Use this to keep the trip_table
sorted as suggested by dump_trip_list(). When inserting a trip into
the table do that after adding the dives, to avoid warnings coming
out of dump_trip_list().
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Rename
- dive_get_insertion_index() -> dive_table_get_insertion_index()
- unregister_dive_from_table() -> remove_from_dive_table()
- get_idx_in_table() -> get_idx_in_dive_table()
- sort_table() -> sort_dive_table()
This will make it more straight-forward to generate these functions
from macros.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Currently autogroup_dives() groups all dives in the global dive
list. Add a table parameter so that dives in any table can be
grouped. Thus it will be possible to pre-group dives on import,
which will be used for undo of import.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In commit 6bf4120dbb the trip-flags
were replaced by a simple boolean. This made the was_autogen
parameter to the remove_dive_from_trip() and unregister_dive_from_trip()
functions unused. Remove these parameters.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Unsure where this bug got introduced, but when asking for the dive
time to be shifted 1 hour later, the divelist and the dive details
showed 1 our earlier.
Fixes: #1893
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
In 302f6adb79 dive-splitting was made
undo-able. To this goal, the dive-splitting functions were split in
two types: Those that operate directly on the divelist and those that
only allocate the dives. The former are not in use anymore, therefore
remove them. Since only the latter remain, remove the "_dont_insert"
appendix of the name.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In f427226b3b a combine_trips_create()
function was introduced that combined trips without deleting the old
trips. This was necessary for making combine-trips function undo-able.
The old combine_trips() function is not used anymore. Therefore remove
it. Rename the combine_trips_create() function to combine_trips() as
no differentiation is needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In moveDivesBetweenTrips() a the model is informed of dives
that are moved between trips. A flag tells the model to delete
empty trips. If dives were removed in batches [use case: split
a big trip into multiple smaller trips] the flag would be sent
for every batch. This was handled gracefully by the model code,
but it gave a warning message.
Set the flag only for the last batch, when the trip is *really*
empty.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
... otherwise this change is not saved when saving to git.
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
On shift-times, the list of dives in a trip may become disordered.
Reestablish order with sort_table().
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The dives of each trip were kept in a list. Replace this by a
struct dive_table. This will make it significantly easier to
keep the dives of a trip in sorted state.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Up to now, dives were added to the global dive table with
add_single_dive(). Split out the funtionality to add a dive to
an arbitrary dive in the add_dive_to_table_function(). The
difference compared to record_dive_to_table is that dives
are added at a specific position or the sort-criterion given
by dive_less_than(). This will allow to use a dive tabe for trips
instead of a linked list.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There were two versions of the insert_trip() function: one
would merge trips if a trip with the same date already existed,
the other wouldn't. The latter was introduced with the dive-list
undo work.
The problem is that the "date" of a trip (i.e. the first dive)
seems ill-defined as this is a volatile value. Moreover in
the context of making dive-import undoable this is a very
dangerous notion, as the caller needs control over when the dives
are added to a trip.
Therefore, unify these two functions and never merge trips.
The decision on merging dives now has to made by the caller.
This will be implemented in a future commit.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Planned dives were still added by directly calling core code.
This could confuse the undo-machinery, leading to crashes.
Instead, use the proper undo-command. The problem is that as
opposed to the other AddDive-commands, planned dives may
belong to a trip. Thus, the interface to the AddDive command
was changed to respect the divetrip field. Make sure that
the other callers reset that field (actually, it should never
be set). Add a comment describing the perhaps surprising
interface (the passed-in dive, usually displayed dive, is
reset).
Moreover, a dive cloned in the planner is not assigned a
new number. Thus, add an argument to the AddDive-command,
which expresses whether a new number should be generated
for the to-be-added dive.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Instead of reloading all the filter, only increment / decrement the
count of the entries of added / removed dives.
Originally, this was planned to be done via the signals from the
divelist, but it turned out that this was suboptimal, because
if the filter decides that the new item is selected, this has to
be done *before* adding the dive. Otherwise, it wouldn't be shown.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
