Hey, now you can sort your dives by how good your SAC is. Which sounds
more useful than it probably actually is. But maybe you can see
patterns in what makes your SAC suck..
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Sure, it's visible elsewhere, but this way you can search and sort for
it, and see several entries at once. So again, having it visible in the
dive list is a good thing.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
.. and make the date string much more readable, now that we aren't
actually size-constrained any more.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This doesn't really fill them, it just adds them to the possible
entries. I'll get to it later.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Currently we use random hard-coded integers, and it's not always clear
what is going on. Make it much more explicit with an enumeration of the
different divelist columns.
And change the column order to make it more logical, and make sure we
actually catch all uses while at it.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Just iterate over the dive list entries, updating them one by one.
This avoids the "selection destroyed" when the dive units are changed.
And it's cleaner anyway.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Each caller ends up needing it, and I missed another one. So rather
than update the other caller, just do it in dive_list_update_dives() and
we can stop worrying about it.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
..as suggested by Nathan:
"I also wanted to "zebra" color the divelist by setting the rules-hint
to TRUE. but I noticed it was already set explicitly to FALSE (even
if this is the default).
If this is just an accidental copy paste from some tutorial you can
experiment (set it to TRUE) and see what you like most."
It was indeed just copy-paste from some tutorial, and the zebra-coloring
does look nicer, doesn't it?
Suggested-by: Nathan Samson <nathansamson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
.. and sort based on the 'time_t' value itself.
This allows us to use a more compact date format that doesn't need to
sort alphabetically, because sorting by date is always based on the date
value. So we can use just a two-digit year, and skip the seconds, to
keep the column narrow, while still sorting correctly.
Also, "Depth" is a nice header string, but it is wider than the column
itself, which makes the whole column wider than necessary. So put the
units in the header instead of in the string, keeping things narrow.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We'll want to add various dive statistics, so... Without them, it all
looks pretty much the same, though.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
.. and repaint the profile when the selection changes.
Now, if it just wasn't so ugly, it might even be useful. Except it
obviously needs to also show all the other dive information. And allow
the user to fill in details. And save the end results.
So no, it's not useful.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
