Most edit commands derive from a common base class EditBase,
which declares a fieldId() virtual function that has to be
defined by the child classes. This is tedious. For some reason
the C++ makers refuse to allow "virtual member constants".
To make the code somewhat less verbose, create these functions
by a template. Of course, we could introduce the template
parameter directly in the EditBase class. However, that would
mean that the code in this base class is generated for every
single undo command. I'm not sure we want that.
This should als make it somewhat less tedious to create new
edit commands by copy & paste.
We could do the same for the fieldName. However, that is more
complicated for two reasons:
1) For historic reasons(?) C++ doesn't allow for string literals
as template parameters. Therefore, arrays-of-string would have
to be defined, which is not very nice.
2) We would have to make sure that these strings are recognized
by Qt's translation machinery and use the QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP
macro, which makes the whole thing even less attractive.
Maybe later.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Grammar-nazi ran
git grep -l 'indexes' | xargs sed -i '' -e 's/indexes/indices/g'
to prevent future wincing when reading the source code.
Unfortunatly, Qt itself is infected as in
QModelIndexList QItemSelection::indexes() const
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
Command that just swaps two dives. This is rather complex,
as for example a dive site might be created.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We tend to use lower-case filenames. Let's do it for these files
as well. Simple search & replace.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Implement the EditWeight undo command. Since there is common code
(storage of the old weight), this creates a common base class for
RemoveWeight and EditWeight. The model calls directly into the undo
command, which is somewhat unfortunate as it feels like a layering
violation. It's the easy thing to do for now.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This one is a bit more complicated than weight adding, because the
multiple-dive case is not well defined. If multiple dives are selected,
this implementation will search for weights that are identical to the
weight deleted in the currently shown dive. The position of the weight
in the list is ignored.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Introduce an AddWeight undo command. This is modelled after the
numerous dive-edit undo commands. The redo and undo actions are
connected to the WeightModel via two new signals, weightAdded
and weightRemoved.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Recently, undo of dive-replanning was introduced. Therefore,
it appears logical to do the same thing for editing of the
profile of manually added dives.
For now, use the same undo-command, just change the displayed
text from "replan dive" to "edit profile". Move the fixup dive
call into the undo-command.
Eventually, every action on the profile should be made undoable.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Connect the UI to the underlying dive structure. Enable proper initialisation
and management of star widgets while Information tab is active. Enable undo for
the addtional star widgets.
Signed-off-by: willemferguson <willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
In the future we might want to use undo-commands for mobile as
well (even if not implementing undo).
Therefore, move the undo-command source from desktop-widgets
to their own commands top-level folder.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-11-14 21:02:07 +01:00
Renamed from desktop-widgets/command_edit.h (Browse further)
