I still suspect that using spinbuttons for the time handling is the
wrong way, and I'm a bit surprised the Calendar widget doesn't have a
mode where you can see/set the time too.
But this makes things at least minimally prettier, and initializes the
time entries to the current time (which is obviously not what anybody
really wants, but looks a lot better than defaulting to "midnight" or
some other random time that *also* won't be what anybody actually
wants).
I think this might be something we can live with, although I hope
somebody with good taste comes along and say "don't use spinbuttons, do
this: xyzzy" and makes things look better yet.
Also, I have this suspicion that I should put the time/depth/duration
stuff to the right of the calendar. Most displays are wider than they
are tall, so tall and skinny dialogs are bad especially if you have
limited vertical pixels. I still have flashbacks to my netbook-using
days, hating applictions that did that.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
No need for right-clicks. It's inconvenient on lots of laptops etc, so
allow just using the Dive menu as an alternative.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Christ, if you look up "Ugly dialog" on Wikipedia, I think it has a
picture of this "New dive" thing. Or it should have.
But it kind of works. Although with only a "max depth" entry, you can't
currently set average depths etc, so SAC-rates etc cannot be calculated
for these kinds of dives.
And the dive numbering is wrong. We do auto-number new dives that get
added at the end, but we do it as we add them, so when you *edit* the
dive information (before it has been added) the dive number shows up as
"#0".
So there's certainly room for improvement here.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Do a right-click to get a menu with the "Add dive" entry. Should do
delete too, but that's for later.
What's also apparently for later is to make this *useful*. It's the
butt-ugliest time entry field ever, and there's no way to set depth for
the dive either. So this is more of a RFC than anything truly useful.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This does mean that you have to build subsurface against a new version
of libdivecomputer, and that version is likely going to have various
slightly incompatible changes. But the new interfaces allow for easily
adding new supported dive computers without subsurface having to be
updated for each new vendor and model, so some slight pain is definitely
worth it this time.
I'm not even going to try to have some backwards-compatible version
here, the libdivecomputer interface changes are so extensive. Native
enumeration of devices is just the smallest part of it: the constants
and types that libdivecomputer uses now have much nicer names that all
start with DC_ or dc_, so you don't get the kinds of name clashes we had
with "gasmix_t" etc.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The cochran CSV pressure data is actually in units of '4 psi', not in
just psi. That seems to be the resolution cochran internally keeps
things in, and unlike the depth reading there's no conversion to
standard units in the export (for depth, the quarter-foot depth
resolution is converted to tenths of feet when exporting).
Yeah, none of this makes any sense to me either, but I knew it was the
case. I had just forgotten that factor-of-four when I did the importer.
With this fix, I get the same subsurface data (modulo some rounding
differences particularly for temperature) whether I go through David
McNett's UDDF converter, or just import the CSV data directly.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The Cochran Analyst software can export the basic dive information as
CSV files (comma-separated values).
Individual CSV files contain just one particular type of information:
depth, temperature or cylinder pressure, which is rather inconvenient.
However, the way subsurface works, you can just import these CSV files
all as individual dives, and then subsurface will automatically merge
the dives with the same date and time - and in the process it will also
merge all the samples.
So it turns out that we don't really need any special handling. You can
literally just do
subsurface <list-your-cochran-export-files-here>
and you're all done.
Of course, the CSV files really *are* pretty useless, since they don't
contain all the nice information about where the dive took place etc.
So you literally just get the dive profile. But that's better than
getting nothing at all.
I'd love to actually be able to parse the real native Cochran Analyst
software CAN files, but in the meantime this is at least a starting
point. And if I'm ever able to parse those nasty CAN-files, this makes
comparisons with the exports much easier.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Convert feet to mm, psi to mbar, and F to mkelvin. We do this elsewhere
too, but I'm going to need it for the Cochran CSV files, so let's do the
helpers now.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The Cochran CSV depth exports are indeed in tenths of feet, but the
decimal is always 0, 3, 5 or 8. Where the 3 and 8 are obviously 0.25
and 0.75 rounded up to one decimal place.
So Cochran does seem to be very much about imperial units, with depth
and cylinder pressure scaled by four (depth in quarter-foot increments,
pressume in 4-psi increments)
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The code is pretty useless, the comments perhaps equally so. I'm trying
to figure out what the data pattern is for the cochran CAN files. There
definitely *is* a pattern, but it actually seems to be different for the
files of different people - and it's not obvious in any case.
There probably are multiple versions of the format, and there might be
things like "David has a high-pressure sensor, and Alex does not" going
on too.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
David McNett sent me some example Cochran CAN file data, along with his
UDDF exports of same. I still have absolutely no idea how to decode the
CAN files (although the subsurface decrypting code seems to correctly
decrypt the data, and I see binary patters rather than just noise), but
at least I can make sure we parse the UDDF portion better.
See also
https://github.com/nugget/cochran2uddf
for David's tool to convert the Cochran CSV exports into UDDF.
Data-source: David McNett <nugget@macnugget.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It should be possible to have a certain limit where we
stop zooming so that short dives are visible as such
at first glance. Therefore a "Zoom" button has been
added to the "Log" menu along with a shortcut (Ctrl + "0").
The user can now zoom/unzoom the plot and is still able to
quickly distinguish short dives from normal ones when
browsing the log.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Güntner <maximilian.guentner@gmail.com>
The time marker increments have also been changed to better values.
Also, display more time information for short dives.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Güntner <maximilian.guentner@gmail.com>
It is really annoying to have to type the device name each time you need
to import a dive from your computer, if you are not using the default
device name. This will save the device name in the configuration file and
matches the logic currently used to save the dive computer name in the
configuration file.
Signed-off-by: Terrance Stanfield <t@hollowcranium.com>
It's very annoying to have to do "make install" to test a new xslt file,
just because the default xslt path has the standard install path as the
first entry.
At the same time, we do want to default to just using the standard
install location first.
So to allow both testing, and having a nice sane default, just add
support for a SUBSURFACE_XSLT_PATH environment variable that overrides
the default one if it exists.
So then you can just do
SUBSURFACE_XSLT_PATH=xslt ./subsurface
to run subsurface from inside the git tree itself, using the current
files in the git xslt subdirectory.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This is, I think, the last piece of relevant information that I can find
in Szymon's SDE file.
Which is not to mean that we get all the conversions right, or that we
handle the more complex cases (still no multi-cylinder import, for
example). But it should be much better than it used to be.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This converts the weight information into subsurface weights, and also
adds visibility info (if it exists) into the notes for the dive.
More fall-out from me looking at the nasty suunto xml files, now that I
have a few that actually have some info that isn't just from the
computer download.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Looking at the XML of the two dives Szymon Kosecki sent out to the
subsurface list, I notice that our cylinder size conversion was wrong.
It looks like CYLINDERUNITS is what determines whether the cylinder size
is in metric (0) or imperial (1) units.
Of course, if you gave a cylinder size in cuft and didn't give a working
pressure, subsurface will just ignore the size as the random crap it is.
We *could* default to a working pressure of 3000 psi, of course.
This also picks up the CYLINDERDESCRIPTION value, although neither of
Szymon's dives actually had any description.
I need more SDE xml files to figure out how multi-cylinder dives look
etc, but I think this gets most *simple* SDE files converted almost
correctly now.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The xslt translation didn't add the <notes> tag for the notes, so while
it did select the notes from the SDM file, that never made it into the
subsurface notes.
Also added weather info to the notes, mainly as an example.
There are probably other things we could do, but this fixes at least the
trivial test-case from Szymon Kosecki.
Reported-by: Szymon Kosecki <skosecki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This desktop entry lists a category that is not one of the registered
Main or Additional Categories in the FreeDesktop specification.
Refer to
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/1.0/apa.html
for details.
Signed-off-by: Khalid El Fathi <khalid@elfathi.fr>
Acked-By: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It's missing a brief description. The "NAME" section is parsed by
lexgrog and used to generate a database that's queried by commands like
apropos and whatis. Replacement a hyphen by a minus sign.
Signed-off-by: Khalid El Fathi <khalid@elfathi.fr>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
flushing the entire registry is not required on windows. simply
closing the registry key when done would suffice.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
I'm hoping most other dive computers are quicker to import from than the
Suunto I have, but mine can take minutes to import all the dives. Sure,
we have that nice progress bar, so it shows that it's doing something,
but it's not really showing *what* it is doing.
So instead of showing just "Parsing dive X", let's show the date of the
dive. That way, when it takes two minutes to import all the dives, at
least you can see "oh, it's going back to the dives of last year" and it
then feels like you have some good reason for the delay.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Instead of using printf() to print the string updates ("Parsing sample
data" etc), introduce a function to show those strings in the graphical
progress bar itself.
Subsurface hasn't been a text-mode application in a long time ;)
This partially fixes the second todo entry from commit b0ba22a068
("Show dive import error messages in the import dialog") and generally
makes for a more helpful import - at least for the largely error-free
cases.
Sadly, the messages that really come from within libdivecomputer itself
(like "suunto_vyper2.c:193: Failed to receive the answer.") when things
go really wrong are not caught. libdivecomputer does have a notion of a
logfile (set with "message_set_logfile()"), but that ends up being
really inconvenient.
Maybe we could use some pipe setup or something. Oh well.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This was a todo item in commit b0ba22a068 ("Show dive import error
messages in the import dialog") which made the import dialog able to
retry the import on errors.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Sure, you can import a file too, but it really makes more sense to have
the actions related to importing new logs under "Log", I think. I don't
think of it as a file operation.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
.. not in the main window. And leave the import dialog open, so that
you can either try doing it again, or cancel. This makes it much easier
to re-try a failed dive import, and actually makes the failure more
obvious too.
Todo:
- make the "Ok" button change to "Retry" when an error happens
- try to see if we can catch the actual status update messages from
libdivecomputer and show them too in the import dialog. Right now
they are printed out to stderr by the library.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Always having to re-select the same dive computer got really annoying
when I had trouble importing the dives. Let's not force the user to do
that, since we could just remember the last dive computer used, and
default to that one.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
On Linux and MacOS the subsurface_close_conf() doesn't really close the
config file (it flushes writes on MacOS), but on Windows it does
actually close the registry hkey.
Which is bad, if you change the settings multiple times - we assume that
the config file is open the whole time.
So add a "subsurface_flush_conf()" function, and call *that* when
changing configuration parameters. And call the close function only at
the very end.
Alternatively, maybe we should just open the config file separately
every time. I don't much care, maybe somebody else does.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
libdivecomputer has the absolute worst interfaces to any library *ever*,
and randomly changes those crappy interfaces when it adds support for
new dive computers.
It would have been much better if the interface was just a "open this
device" with a device descriptor structure pointer, so that when Jef
adds support for new devices, the old descriptors still stay around and
work the same way - there's just a new descriptor structure that you
*can* use if you want. Along with a data structure to name the devices
and their descriptors, this would actually mean that users could just
support pretty much any random device that LD supports.
But no, that's not how libdivecomputer works. It has random enums and
crazy different ad-hoc interfaces for different dive computers. Or,
like in this case, crazy different ad-hoc interfaces for the *same*old*
dive computer.
Right now, for example, the support for the new Heinrichs Weikamp "Frog"
computer added a flag to the interface for the old OSTC_2 support.
Breaking any libdivecomputer users even if you didn't need Frog support.
And is there a version number in the header files to check for? Yes,
there's a version number. But no, it's not useful, since it doesn't
actually change with the interface changes. This time, Jef actually did
change the version number (from 0.1.0 to 0.2.0) as part of new
development version, but there's no reason to believe that it will
change in the future as the interfaces change - it never has before.
So it's actually safer - and easier to understand - to check for the
existence of the new header file inclusion mechanism. A new version of
libdivecomputer that supports the HW Frog computer will include the
"ostc_frog.h" header file when you include the libdivecomputer device.h
file, and that will result in HW_FROG_H being defined.
So we can check whether libdivecomputer has the new interface and
supports the Frog by doing an "#ifdef HW_FROG_H" hack. Ugh.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We used to not properly update the dive info until we switched to
another dive when we edited it. This should fix it.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Linus found this embarrassing bug: double clicking on a weight system in
order to edit it launched the edit function for the first cylinder
instead. Oops.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
... but only do it if the numbering of subsequent dives was consecutive
to begin with.
Note that we do accept unnumbered dives (and will stop the sequence
check if we find one), but in order to renumber dives on delete, we
require that starting with the dive we delete, the subsequent numbered
dives have to be a nice incrementing series. If that is the case, then
we fix up that numbering as we delete the dive.
Put another way: if the dive numbering was an incrementing sequence
before the delete, then it will be a sane incrementing sequence after it
too. But if you had missing dives before the delete, we will turn the
delete into just another missing dive.
The basic rule is that we never renumber any dives unless that
renumbering is "obviously correct". It's better to leave old numbers
as-is (and expect that the user is going to do an explicit re-numbering
operation) than it is to change dive numbers in a sequence that we don't
understand.
I do suspect that we should possibly check the dive number "backwards"
too, but this doesn't do that.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This interface works the same way the "edit dive" menu item does: it's a
text entry meny item on the dive text entries (ie buddy/divemaster/notes
sections). Except you pick the "Delete" entry rather than the "Edit"
entry.
It kind of works, but it really is a pretty horrible interface. I'll
need to add a top-level dive menu entry for just deleting all selected
dives instead. And it would be good to be able to get a drop-down menu
from the divelist instead of having to do it from the dive text entries,
which is just insane.
But that requires gtk work. I'm not quite ready to get back into that.
Thus the "exact same insane interface as the explicit 'Edit' mode".
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Commit f9bb3f7910 ("Clean up reference tank information table") had
cleaned up the tank info list so that you could sanely do tanks in
liters and with a working pressure in bar.
But the LP steel cylinders had somehow missed out on the ".psi =" part
of the equation, and as a result, what was supposed to be their working
pressure instead ended up being interpreted as their size in
milli-liters.
Oops.
Fix that, and also make the standard tank info filling code actually
verify the sanity of the reference tank table, so that if this happens
again, it will complain loudly instead of using nonsensical values.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
old_sac_time was always 0 when calculating average air consumption.
Thus the results were incorrect. Move the counter to stats_t structure
as suggested by Linus.
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Pull weight management from Dirk Hohndel:
"This is the fifth or sixth version of this code, I'm begining to lose
track. I still struggle with the balance between code duplication and
unnecessary indirectness and complexity. Maybe I'm just not finding
the right level of abstraction. Maybe I'm just trying too hard.
The code here is reasonably well tested. Works for me :-)
It can import DivingLog xml files with weight systems and correctly
parses those. It obviously can read and write weight systems in its
own file format. It adds a KG/lbs unit default (and correctly stores
that).
The thing I still worry about is the code in equipment.c. You'll see
that I tried to abstract things in a way that weight systems and
cylinders share quite a bit of code - but there's more very similar
code that isn't shared as my attempts to do so turned into ugly and
hard to read code. It always felt like trying to write C++ in C..."
* 'weight' of git://subsurface.hohndel.org/subsurface:
Add weight system tracking
Fix up some trivial conflicts due to various renaming of globals and
simplification in function interfaces.
- supports multiple weight systems per dive
- supports multiple weight system types
- supports import of weight as tracked by DivingLog
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
If at least 2 dives are selected, show statistics of these dives on
Overall Stats. Otherwise, show the statistics of all dives. Temperature
is also added to the shown statistics.
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com>
Minor change to avoid adding statistics.h (moved the global variable and
external function declaration to display-gtk.h).
Another minor change to the text displayed for the "Stats" notebook page.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This seems to do the dive data descrambling right for both files I have
access to. Except it uses a hardcoded (different) offset for the two.
I have yet to figure out how to automatically detect the offset itself
properly, so you have to compile for the right file.
I'll figure it out, but I'm committing this as a reasonable point in the
process.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It turns out the odd "different CAN files have different header offsets"
came from the fact that the decode block was different lengths, and I
had not picked the correct place to start - and instead had found two
different places that were at different offsets due to the decode block
length differences.
This fixes that up, and it looks like the dive header is correctly
descrambled (but what the data *means* is unclear, although there is now
an ASCII date and time visible, so at least one part of it is pretty
obvious).
The actual dive data unscrambling is still different for the two
test-files I have to play with, I do not know why.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This descrambles at least parts of the header data. Some of it has the
same pattern of data 4kB apart, it may be that there is a dive hiding in
there too (ie what I currently call a "header" may in fact be a header
_plus_ a dive).
But the 4kB thing may well be an artifact of the crazy scrambling code
itself. Who knows what kind of chunking the Cochran Analyst
"encryption" uses.
As with the dive data, there seems to be some offset differences between
different CAN files.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
So this descrambles all the dives in *one* of my cochran test files. I
still don't know what the dive data *means*, but it's not a random
jumble of bytes any more: there are very clear patterns.
However, the magic offsets that work for that particular CAN file are
not generic, because they don't work for another. So there is some
magic dynamic decoding that I don't know about. There is probably more
decode information in the initial decode block, over and beyond just the
scrambling bytes.
(The scrambling array is 234 bytes starting at 0x40001, but the first
actual *dive* data starts at 0x45e03, so there's tons of unknown stuff
in the file even outside the dives themselves)
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Just do the hex-dump in the program, and print all the results to
standard output. Avoid the need to do 'od' by hand etc to see what
happens when you play with the decoder.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It's broken, and currently only writes out a debug output file per dive.
I'm not sure I'll ever really be able to decode the mess that is the
Cochran ANalyst stuff, but I have a few test files, along with separate
depth info from a couple of the dives in question, so in case this ever
works I can at least validate it to some degree.
The file format is definitely very intentionally obscured, though.
Annoying. It's not like the Cochran software is actually all that good
(it's really quite a horribly nasty Windows-only app, I'm told).
Cochran Analyst is very much not the reason why people would buy those
computers. So Cochran making their computers harder to use with other
software is just stupid.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
