To my understanding, declaring empty parameter lists using "(void)"
is an artifact from the bad old K&R times, when functions were
declared without(!) parameters. Which in hindsight was an absolute
recipe for disaster. So for backwards compatibility, functions
without parameters had to be declared using "(void)" as "()"
could also mean "any function".
That was 40 years ago. Meanwhile, C++ introduced references,
which made it a necessity to declare the function parameters.
So "(void)" is redundant and inconsistent in C++ code and
just makes no sense.
Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the taxonomy is now a real C++ struct with constructor
and destructor, dive_site has to be converted to C++ as well.
A bit hairy for now, but will ultimately be distinctly simpler.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Use std::vector<> instead of fixed size array.
Doesn't do any logic change, even though the back-translation
logic is ominous.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The old code was wild: For the yearly statistics it would allocate
one entry per dive in the log. Of course, it would also leak
C-style strings.
Convert the whole thing to somewhat idiomatic C++.
Somewhat wasted work, because I'd like to convert the whole thing
to the new statistics code. But let's finish the conversion to C++
first.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
- standardise the naming;
- use it consistently;
- apply the 'samples < 50' only when putting manually added dives into
edit mode - everywhere else manually added dives should be treated as
such;
- do not show a warning before editing a manually added dive in planner.
Signed-off-by: Michael Keller <github@ike.ch>
Currently editing of planned dives that have been merged with actual
(logged) dives only works if the 'Planned dive' divecomputer is the
first divecomputer, and this divecomputer is selected when clicking
'Edit planned dive'. In other cases the profile of the first
divecomputer is overlaid with the profile of the planned dive, and the
first divecomputer's profile is overwritten when saving the dive plan.
Fix this problem.
Triggered by @SeppoTakalo's comment (https://github.com/subsurface/subsurface/issues/1913#issuecomment-2075562119): Users don't like that planned dives show up as their own entries in the dive list, so being able to merge them with the actual dive after it has been executed is a good feature - but this wasn't working well until now.
Signed-off-by: Michael Keller <github@ike.ch>
Fix the filters for planned (i.e. has at least one dive plan attached)
and logged (i.e. has at least one dive computer log attached) dives.
Also refactor the respective functions for improved readability.
Signed-off-by: Michael Keller <github@ike.ch>
In C++ files, replace MIN and MAX by std::min and std::max,
respectively. There are still a few C files using these
macros. Convert them in due course.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Opportunistically fix some problems newly raised by a recent Coverity
scan.
Not touching any of the string memory allocation issues as this is being
handled by the move towards C++ strings.
Signed-off-by: Michael Keller <mikeller@042.ch>
This changes default behavior when creating a sample struct
in C++ code: it is now initialized to default values. If this
ever turns out to be a performance problem, we can either add
additional constructors or use special functions that do
not initialize memory, such as make_unique_for_overwrite.
This removes non-standard (respectively >C++20) constructs,
namely designated initializers.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Avoid error-prone malloc/free pairs. This uses somewhat
obscure constructs to stay as close as possible to the
original C code. Notably, it uses mostly unique_ptr<T[]>
which doesn't store the length of the array, because the
length is supposed to be known.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Long term project: convert core to C++ so that we can
use higer-level constructs, notably std::vector<>.
This does not change any code - only fixes compile issues.
Mostly casting of (void *) to the proper type. Also designated
initialization of the sample struct had to be rearranged.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
