This flushes the dive changes to the dive list, the way the old dive
info frame would update as you update dive fields.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Hey, now you can sort your dives by how good your SAC is. Which sounds
more useful than it probably actually is. But maybe you can see
patterns in what makes your SAC suck..
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Sure, it's visible elsewhere, but this way you can search and sort for
it, and see several entries at once. So again, having it visible in the
dive list is a good thing.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
.. and make the date string much more readable, now that we aren't
actually size-constrained any more.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This doesn't really fill them, it just adds them to the possible
entries. I'll get to it later.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Ok, this makes that dive list look empty and ugly, but as mentioned, we
really should start filling it with all the useful information that we
can sort by, like temperature and air use.
And even stuff that might not make sense to sort by (would you want to
sort by cylinder size or name? Or by nitrox percentage) could still be
*shown* in the list fairly naturally.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It has always been problematic, and I've been moving things in and out
of it.
And it just isn't a very powerful widget. You can't *do* anything with
it. The information it shows you may be useful, but the core stuff
already shows up in the dive list.
And the dive list is actually a much superior widget over that static
dive info frame. The information that shows up in the dive list can be
sorted by column, for example.
So when we show temperatures or SAC numbers in the dive info frame,
that's actually a very bad place to show them: we would be much better
off showing it in the dive list, and then we could sort by SAC or by
temperature.
In other words: just remove the thing. Instead, plan to extend the dive
list to contain all the information. That will probably mean that we
need to change the current pane widget to be a vertical pane, rather
than a horizontal one, but what's wrong with that?
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Currently we use random hard-coded integers, and it's not always clear
what is going on. Make it much more explicit with an enumeration of the
different divelist columns.
And change the column order to make it more logical, and make sure we
actually catch all uses while at it.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
If the velocity is slower than FAST then we look back up to 30 seconds and
calculate the velocity for the past 30 seconds instead.
For the first version I'm not doing the average of the changes but simply
the change from beginning to end.
The alternative would be to do another triangle smoothing or something
like that - but as we don't know how many samples we have in the 30 second
window, it's a little harder here.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This annoyed me from the first moment Linus added the tank pressure graph.
As the pressure goes down, the graph needs to go down. Seriously.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This gives the airconsumption label a fixed size and changes its alignment
so it is anchored to the right.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
So far Linus has hated all of my attempts to visualize vertical velocity
through color. This time I'm trying something dramatically new: there is
no PURPLE involved. Maybe that will convince him of the value.
We simply calculate the vertical velocity for the current plot segment
(last sample point to this sample point - in this version even without
divisions by zero) and assign a label based on the rate of change. These
labels are translated through a predefined table into colors:
Dark green is +/- 5ft/min (stable)
Light green is descents up to 30ft/min and ascents up to 15ft/min
Yellow is descents up to 60ft/min and ascents up to 30ft/min
Orange is descents up to 100ft/min and ascents up to 60ft/min
Red is outside of those ranges - you are most likely in danger
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Even though we go down to an 8pt font the info_frame changes size when the
air info is added. I don't like this but want to see how Linus would like
this resolved before going overboard.
Minor tweaks to the formating (we don't need two decimals when printing
the liters of air consumed).
This patch does NOT remove the plot of the air information in the profile
graph. I think we want to remove that once we like the text where it is,
but I wanted to do one thing at a time.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
It's now in the window title - no point in having it twice.
Also added a little "Dive #xx - " template. The old "##. " was a bit too
minimalistic for my liking.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
I suspect the "info" area is better used for actual values, so move the
dive location into the window title instead (using date if no location
info), and title the info frame with date and time.
This just means that the date/time gets removed from inside the frame:
we may want to put air consumption info in there instead?
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
If the temperature is in a very narrow range the existing code visually
exaggerated the fluctuations. This tries to dampen that effect a bit.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Change the duration max rounding as noted by Dirk, and move the air
consumption down further towards the bottom right corner. In
particular, I make the text positions not scale with the window size,
purely by the size of the text.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- the time stamp where we printed the last temp was wrong
- we really shouldn't check mK for being identical - especially on dive
computers that store a lot of samples
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Ok, this is pretty much it now. Instead of having various random checks
for "is the time of the sample past the end of the dive" hacks, we not
plot all graphs from the cleaned-up plot_info structure instead of the
raw samples.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Further movement to using the sanitized and cleaned-up plot info rather
than the raw data.
The raw dive data contains samples from the end of the dive that we
don't want to drop, but that we also don't want to actually use for
plotting the dive. So the eventual end goal here is to not ever use the
raw dive samples directly for plotting, but use the diveplot data that
we have analyzed for min/max (properly ignoring final entries) etc.
There's still some data that we take from the samples when plotting, but
it's getting rarer.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Do the min/max calculations only *after* we have removed the extra
surface events at the end.
The Uemis data in particular has a lot of surface events after the dive,
and we don't really want to take them into account since we won't be
plotting them anyway.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
.. I'll want to move pressure limit calculations into the 'plot_info',
so that we can do several passes of analysis and change dive limits etc
without having to actually modify the dive data itself (or add new
fields to 'struct dive' just for plotting).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This is the hackiest thing ever, unless you count the previous code that
was even hackier (and just called the gtk main routine at random
places).
The libdivecomputer library is not really set up to be part of the gtk
main loop, and cannot afford (for example) to have lots of mainloop
events while it's parsing. Some dive computers are very timing
sensitive for the communication.
So just start a thread for doing the libdivecomputer stuff, and just
continually call the gtk main loop while that thread is running. I'm
sure we could actually use some gtk signalling thing to make the thread
exit do the right thing, but instead we just poll the status every
100ms.
I did say it was hacky. It does seem to work, though. No more
temporary graying out of the windows when they don't react in a timely
manner because libdivecomputer does some blocking operation.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Sadly, no way to show them yet. But it would be nice to let people
enter them (and it would be doubly nice to have a dive computer that
does it at the surface), and then perhaps just do the "point browser at
google maps" thing.
Saving/parsing tested by hand-feeding the location of Enenui (Molokini
Crater) from google maps by hand into my divelog.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
I never really liked 'diveclog' as a name - it's not like the C part is
all that important. And while I could try to just make up another slang
word for despicable person (in the tradition of naming all my projects
after myself), I just can't see it.
So let's just call it "subsurface".
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Currently we print the temperature every five minutes. Especially with
dive computers that keep rather frequent temperature samples that means
that we have one more interesting data point that we don't label: the
surface temperature at the end of the dive.
This patch adds some logic to try to print the last temperature sample
that was recorded before the dive ended - unless that same value has
already been printed (to avoid silly duplications on dive computers with
less frequent sampling)
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Just like we end depth and tank pressure plots once we are on the surface
(this is relevant for dive computers like the uemis Zurich that keep
recording samples after the end of the dive)
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
stole and fixed Linus' code in the uemis XML importer
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This is missing a ton of the information in the .SDA files It only
parses the divelog.SDA file, not the dive.SDA file It ignores the
information on the gas(es) used and all the data on the tanks.
It still draws some strange artefacts at the end of the dive
But it correctly hooks into the import dialogue, it gives you a file
select box (somewhere, I'm sure, a gtk developer cries quietly) and then
parses enough of this file to serve as a proof of concept.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Dirk points out that equipment changes (cylinder size etc) do not cause
a proper repaint of the dive profile with new SAC information. The
reason? We haven't flushed the changes when the notebook changes from
the equipment page to the dive profile page.
Reported-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Linus clearly wanted to make SURE that we use /dev/ttyUSB0
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
I'll get there. Shrink it down a bit, start adding notes and location,
and maybe put three per page. That might work.
.. or maybe I should just take a look at how others have done this.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Ok, this is the ugliest f*&$ing printout I have ever seen in my life,
but think of it as a "the concept of printing works" commit, and you'll
be able to hold your lunch down and not gouge out your eyeballs with a
spoon. Maybe.
I'm just doing the cairo display as-is for the printout, which is a
seriously bad idea. I need to not try to do colors etc, and instead of
having white lines on a black background I just need to make thelines be
black on white paper.
But that would involve actually changing the current "plot()" routine,
which is against the point of the exercise right now. This really is
just a demonstration of how to add printing capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
I have it in some of my notes, and Dirk seems to fill that in too, so
let's just show it, save it, and allow editing of it..
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Now we always create the MAX_CYLINDER sets of cylinder widgets. But we
don't actually pack them into the frame - that's a separate phase.
Right now we still do the stupid "always just pack two cylinders" thing,
but the idea is that we can pack just as many as the dive needs on a
per-dive basis.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This just always shows two cylinders, which is obviously bogus, but it's
a good test-case for the multi-cylinder case.
I need to figure out how to dynamically show the right number of
cylinders, but that also involves the notion of adding a cylinder in
order to fill out information that didn't use to exist.
That's lower priority - now the infrastructure seems to be there.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Ok, now we have an array of them, and most of the time we pass the right
pointer back and forth.
There's still a couple of places that hardcode "gtk_cylinder[0]" as the
data, but by now they are mostly things that should iterate over all the
cylinders.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Create a "struct cylinder_widget" so that when we handle multiple
cylinders, we can match them up with the actual cylinder data;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Let's try to be consistent about this. Make the parent of each widget
be a box. Maybe the frames come with boxes, but since I have no clue
about gtk, I'm going to just always create them by hand.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It doesn't really make much of a difference, but it can be visible
especially with lots of tight samples. Miter joins really look horrible
for acute angles.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
