In 9310d72943, resetting of the dive
sites was moved to DiveTripModelBase::reset(). This seemed like a
good idea, because it means that the location list is reloaded
every time the dive list is reset.
Unfortunately that function is only used on mobile, thus on desktop
the dive site model is not updated. Do that in
MultiFilterSortModel::resetModel(), because this is always called
when the dive list is reset. Desktop differs from mobile in that
two different models are used depending on whether we are in list
or in tree mode.
Fixes#2749
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When initializing the fulltext-cache and the dive-list, every
100 dives a notification was shown. I had a feeling that this
made startup significantly slower, but that could have been
purely psychological.
Therefore I measured and indeed, removing the fine-grained
notification, it becomes *significantly* faster. For a 3500
dives test log with mobile-on-desktop:
Initialization of the fulltext: 1350 ms -> 730 ms (-46%)
Initialization of the divelistmodel: 689 ms -> 113 ms (-83%)
Let's remove the fine-grained notification. There *is* a visual
indication of work-in-progress anyway.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
To mark invalid dives, we use a struck-out font, which was a static
variable at translation unit scope, i.e. initialized at application
startup. Sadly, this crashes on iOS.
It is unclear when we can initialize fonts. Try to move initialization
to the constructore of DiveTripModelBase and make the font a member
of that class. For consistency, also make the invalidBrush a member
of this class.
This now means that the diveData function cannot be static anymore,
since it needs access to the font and brush. But OK.
Reported-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Mark invalid dives in the dive list by striking them out
and rendering them with a grey color. The color-change is
not sufficient, because the default model delegate ignores
color hints if the item is selected.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When the dive list is cleared or updated, the entries in the
divesite-model become stale and therefore the divesite-model
(with the actual name LocationInformationModel) also must be
updated. This was done manually in some parts of the code and
forgotten in others. Therefore, do it directly in the clear()
and reset() function of the dive list-model.
This might be a bit of a layering violation: why should one
model call into another if they are not in parent/child
relationship? However, this seems easier than introducing
a global "reset dives" function that coordinates the models.
Moreover, it does not appear 100% safe: if the clearing of
the divesite model causes accesses to the divelist-model,
they happen in the midst of a model reset and we had horrible
bugs with that kind of things. However, I don't think that
should happen.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The setData() function was used to edit the number of a dive.
However, that doesn't appear to be functional. Therefore, remove
the code. There is a context-menu entry "renumber dives" for that.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The diveListNotifier.divesSelected() signal is used to inform the
models of a selection change. It sent the current dive as a second
parameter. This is redundant, because the only sender of the signal
sets current_dive just before sending the signal. Remove the
parameter, which appears to be an artifact.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The DiveTripModelTree::divesSelected() returned early if
no dives were selected. Thus, the current dive was not
updated. Remove the check for no dives.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Grammar-nazi ran
git grep -l 'indexes' | xargs sed -i '' -e 's/indexes/indices/g'
to prevent future wincing when reading the source code.
Unfortunatly, Qt itself is infected as in
QModelIndexList QItemSelection::indexes() const
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
This is only used in the mobile UI where the sort direction is fixed and we
refer to dives based on the tree model. So the terms used and the concepts
that these rely on should be guaranteed to be valid.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
When the dive data is cleared, all pointers in the undo-stack become stale.
Desktop explicitly called Command::clear() in that case, but mobile doesn't.
Thus, move the clear() call into DiveTripModelBase::clear()
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
To act as a drop-in replacement (at least as much as possible),
move the roles from the old DiveListModel to the common base
model of mobile and desktop.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Create a model which represents all top-level items and, potentially, one
expanded trip as a flat list.
Pass down roles to the source model and let the source model handle that. We'll
have to do some ifdef-ery, but so be it.
Additionally, compile the base model on mobile as well.
This contains a couple of hacks to make things compile at all.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Once the the mobile app uses the new models, this will be necessary
to get the correct number of filtered dives after startup.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
If compiled on mobile, on change of the current dive, don't send
a signal, but send changed-event with the CURRENT_ROLE for both
dives that changed status (previously selected and newly selected).
Mobile does not use this yet, but will do so with the new flattened
models.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This role returns true if the given trip contains the current
dive. This will be needed by the mobile list model to decide
if a newly added trip should be expanded right away.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Use this role to test whether a dive is the currently displayed dive.
This will be needed to transport changes of the current dive to
the mobile list models.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The DiveFilter class defined the showDive() function to test
whether a dive should be filtered or not. This was used in
DiveTripModel to loop over all dives or all dives affected by
an editing action.
This restricts us in how we do filtering: We can't use indexes
that give us directly the result. To make the filtering more
flexible, move the actual loops that do the filtering to
the DiveFilter class.
The undo-commands likewise called directly the showDive()
function to check whether newly added dives are shown.
Use the new interface here as well.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When changing the filter-criterion and the current dive is
hidden, a new dive is made current. However, when a dive is
hidden because it was edited, it is still shown.
Make this consistent by also selecing a new current dive
in the latter case. Do this by comparing the current_dive
before and after calculating the filter. Since this is now
done in multiple places move this code to the ShownChange
class.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since we now filter at the model level, items are by definition
shown. No need for a flag.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This role was used by the filter-proxy model as filter criterion.
Since we don't use that model to filter anymore, we can remove
the role.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We use a QFilterProxyModel to filter out dives that are hidden
according to the current filter-criterion. Instead, filter the
dives already at the DiveTripModel level. Filter out hidden
dives immediately when receiving them. The only difficult case
is when dives are changed, because then visibility can change.
This means that we have three cases to consider:
1) Visibility unchanged -> send change signal
2) Change from hidden to unhidden -> add dives to model
3) Change from unhidden to hidden -> remove dives from model
Things get complicated by the fact that the tree-version of
the model might have to add/remove full trips!
Suggested-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Use std::equal_to instead of lambdas that compare two dive pointers.
One could argue over which version is more readable. For whatever
it's worth, std::equal_to is more compact and expressive.
This removes an old erroneous comment that stated that std::equal_to
is only available since C++14.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
On desktop, resetting the model is realized by generating a new
model object. This is due to the fact that we have two different
models (tree and list) and for switching between those, we have
to create a new object.
On mobile, currently there are no plans to support the list-mode.
Therefore, there is no reason the recreate the object. Instead,
implement a reset() function that reloads the core data.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The DiveTripModelList forgot to collect the changed dives
when resetting the filter. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Updating the filter can lead to changes of the current dive.
Keep the UI in the know by re-initializing the selection.
This is not optimal, because the whole selection is reset,
but the pragmatic thing to do for now.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This part of the code had that horrible pattern, where reseting
the model would invalidate all pointers to the DiveTrip model.
Internalize these complexities in the MultiFilterSortModel.
All accesses are now performed via that proxy model.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The old code called directly into the DiveListModel. Instead,
send a signal and hook into the signal from the model. This
will allow us to remove the DiveListModel::instance() function.
This, in turn, is a step towards supporting multiple models
at the same time. However, currently the model manually
sets the hidden_by_filter flag in the core and therefore
only one active model is supported at a time.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The goal here is to unify desktop and mobile by moving
selection code from the desktop-only view.
Currently, initialization of the selection still has to be
called from the view after connecting the appropriate signals.
This is due to the weird way in which create completely new
models when resetting them.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
In analogy to the tree-model send signals when dives change
their shown status in the list-view. Do this in two passes
(collect changes; send changes) to be able to reuse the
already existing functions.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Send signals if the shown-status of top level items changed.
Do this in two passes to be able to use the previously created
function.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
To avoid having to do full filter reloads, send dive-changed signals
for dives in trips when the shown-status changed. But only for trips
where not all dives are hidden. Because for those, the plan is to
hide the trip as a whole.
Implement the signal sending in its own function so that it can be
reused for top-level items and the list-view.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Implementing proper model semantics (only sending a changed
signal for items that actually changed) will be somewhat
complicated. Therefore, move the filtering of trip-items
to its own function to make the nesting a little bit less
deep.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The DiveListModelBase::clear() implementation was flawed: It cleared
the data in the core, but left the data in the model untouched.
The code was relying on the fact that the caller would reset the
model manually. Not a good idea.
Therefore, clear the internal data to keep the model consistent at
all times.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The way this was accessed via Qt's model semantics was horrible.
This gives arguably more readable code, since we don't have to
shoehorn things through QVariants.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Split out the actual filtering from the MultiFilterSortModel.
Create a DiveFilter class that does the actual filtering.
Currently, mobile and desktop have their own version of this
class, though ultimately we may want to merge them.
The idea here is that the trip-model and undo-commands have
direct access to the filter-function and thus can take care
of keeping track of the number of shown dives, etc.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Introduce a DiveTripModelBase::clear() function that cleanly
clears all dive data inside a beginResetModel()/endResetModel()
pair. Thus, the UI will be cleanly reset and we can remove
explicit calls to
- graphics->setEmptyState()
- mainTab->clearTabs()
- mainTab->clearTabs()
- diveList->reload()
from MainWindow::closeCurrentFile().
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
DiveTripModelTree::topLevelChanged() has pretty complex code, as
it has to handle the fact that when adding/removing a dive from
a trip, the trip can change its position.
The code did not account for the fact that when moving an object
back in the top level list, one has to subtract one from the new
index, because the object was removed somewhere in the front of
the list.
To make matters worse, when an entry stayed where it was, this
was realized by moving the entry right behind itself, which of
course means that it stays where it is. But this meant that in
the by far most common case (no moving) the wrong entry was
updated.
Fix this by subtracting 1 from the new index when moving an
entry to the back.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
