add_sample() was used in only one place, and the return value was
always ignored. It took a time parameter, suggesting that a sample
could be added anywhere, but in reality the sample was added at
the end of the list. It used prepare_sample() that copies data
from the previous sample, just to overwrite it with the newly
added sample.
All in all very weird. Simplify the function: just append the
passed in sample and name it accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a rather long commit, because it refactors lots of the event
code from pointer to value semantics: pointers to entries in an
std::vector<> are not stable, so better use indexes.
To step through the event-list at diven time stamps, add *_loop classes,
which encapsulate state that had to be manually handled before by
the caller. I'm not happy about the interface, but it tries to
mirror the one we had before.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the name of an event is not incorporated into the even
structure anymore, we don't need these shenanigans. Just assign
the event name.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a hairy one, because the sample code is rather tricky.
There was a pattern of looping through pairs of adjacent samples,
for interpolation purposes. Add an range adapter to generalize
such loops.
Removes the finish_sample() function: The code would call
prepare_sample() to start parsing of samples and then
finish_sample() to actuall add it. I.e. a kind of commit().
Since, with one exception, all users of prepare_sample()
called finish_sample() in all code paths, we might just add
the sample in the first place. The exception was sample_end()
in parse.cpp. This brings a small change: samples are now
added, even if they could only be parsed partially. I doubt
that this makes any difference, since it will only happen
for broken divelogs anyway.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This allows us to use non-C member variables. Convert a number
of pointers to unique_ptr<>s.
Code in uemis-downloader.cpp had to be refactored, because
it mixed owning and non-owning pointers. Mad.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We can now return mutable/imutable depending on const-ness of
the parameter, owing to parameter overloading.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Makes the code much nicer to read.
Default initialize cylinder_t to the empty cylinder.
This produces lots of warnings, because most structure are now
not PODs anymore and shouldn't be erased using memset().
These memset()s will be removed one-by-one and replaced by
proper constructors.
The whole ordeal made it necessary to add a constructor to
struct event. To simplify things the whole optimization of
the variable-size event names was removed. In upcoming commits
this will be replaced by std::string anyway.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
To my understanding, declaring empty parameter lists using "(void)"
is an artifact from the bad old K&R times, when functions were
declared without(!) parameters. Which in hindsight was an absolute
recipe for disaster. So for backwards compatibility, functions
without parameters had to be declared using "(void)" as "()"
could also mean "any function".
That was 40 years ago. Meanwhile, C++ introduced references,
which made it a necessity to declare the function parameters.
So "(void)" is redundant and inconsistent in C++ code and
just makes no sense.
Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the taxonomy is now a real C++ struct with constructor
and destructor, dive_site has to be converted to C++ as well.
A bit hairy for now, but will ultimately be distinctly simpler.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Use std::vector<> instead of fixed size array.
Doesn't do any logic change, even though the back-translation
logic is ominous.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The old code was wild: For the yearly statistics it would allocate
one entry per dive in the log. Of course, it would also leak
C-style strings.
Convert the whole thing to somewhat idiomatic C++.
Somewhat wasted work, because I'd like to convert the whole thing
to the new statistics code. But let's finish the conversion to C++
first.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
- standardise the naming;
- use it consistently;
- apply the 'samples < 50' only when putting manually added dives into
edit mode - everywhere else manually added dives should be treated as
such;
- do not show a warning before editing a manually added dive in planner.
Signed-off-by: Michael Keller <github@ike.ch>
Currently editing of planned dives that have been merged with actual
(logged) dives only works if the 'Planned dive' divecomputer is the
first divecomputer, and this divecomputer is selected when clicking
'Edit planned dive'. In other cases the profile of the first
divecomputer is overlaid with the profile of the planned dive, and the
first divecomputer's profile is overwritten when saving the dive plan.
Fix this problem.
Triggered by @SeppoTakalo's comment (https://github.com/subsurface/subsurface/issues/1913#issuecomment-2075562119): Users don't like that planned dives show up as their own entries in the dive list, so being able to merge them with the actual dive after it has been executed is a good feature - but this wasn't working well until now.
Signed-off-by: Michael Keller <github@ike.ch>
Fix the filters for planned (i.e. has at least one dive plan attached)
and logged (i.e. has at least one dive computer log attached) dives.
Also refactor the respective functions for improved readability.
Signed-off-by: Michael Keller <github@ike.ch>
In C++ files, replace MIN and MAX by std::min and std::max,
respectively. There are still a few C files using these
macros. Convert them in due course.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Opportunistically fix some problems newly raised by a recent Coverity
scan.
Not touching any of the string memory allocation issues as this is being
handled by the move towards C++ strings.
Signed-off-by: Michael Keller <mikeller@042.ch>
This changes default behavior when creating a sample struct
in C++ code: it is now initialized to default values. If this
ever turns out to be a performance problem, we can either add
additional constructors or use special functions that do
not initialize memory, such as make_unique_for_overwrite.
This removes non-standard (respectively >C++20) constructs,
namely designated initializers.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Avoid error-prone malloc/free pairs. This uses somewhat
obscure constructs to stay as close as possible to the
original C code. Notably, it uses mostly unique_ptr<T[]>
which doesn't store the length of the array, because the
length is supposed to be known.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Long term project: convert core to C++ so that we can
use higer-level constructs, notably std::vector<>.
This does not change any code - only fixes compile issues.
Mostly casting of (void *) to the proper type. Also designated
initialization of the sample struct had to be rearranged.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
