MobileSwipeModel is probably not an ideal name, but all I could come up with.
One of the main complications here is that our list is reversed with respect to
the source model. We should change that one day. Probably by moving the
sorting down to the core-model.
Since looking up the source row is somewhat expensive, the lookup is cached for
a single entry because accesses come in bursts for a single dive. This should
be a good compromise and avoids keeping track of a full row-to-dive array.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
In analogy to the DiveTripModel split, derive MobileListModel from a base
model that exports the roles, etc. This will allow us to create a second model,
which nevertheless possesses the same roles and all that without too much code
duplication.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since we want to add a second model, but not have to manage two models
everywhere, create a class MobileModels that contains both of the models. When
calling reset() on that class, it will reset both of the models, etc.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Create a model which represents all top-level items and, potentially, one
expanded trip as a flat list.
Pass down roles to the source model and let the source model handle that. We'll
have to do some ifdef-ery, but so be it.
Additionally, compile the base model on mobile as well.
This contains a couple of hacks to make things compile at all.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
