There are cases where we actually want to keep them, as exemplified by
this situation from Richard Yorke:
"I have just come across a situation when ignoring the surface marker
is a disadvantage. I have just had a problem with my BC feed
seeping, slowly filling my BC and as I control my buoyancy on the
bottom using the air in my drysuit, I did not notice, so that when I
came to ascend the expanding air in my BC caused a loss of control.
Fortunately not from a great depth and no untoward consequences.
However, the Subsurface profile only shows me rising to 4m and
descending to 5.5m for my safety stop. However I actually broke the
surface and descented to 5.5 but the frequency of recording depth was
not fast enough to show this as it was so brief"
so remove the code that ignores the surface events entirely.
I think we'll have to come up with some smarter filtering model for
showing them, but that is predicated on getting these events to come
through in the first place.
Reported-by: Richard Yorke <yorke.richard@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Having subsurface-core as a directory name really messes with
autocomplete and is obviously redundant. Simmilarly, qt-mobile caused an
autocomplete conflict and also was inconsistent with the desktop-widget
name for the directory containing the "other" UI.
And while cleaning up the resulting change in the path name for include
files, I decided to clean up those even more to make them consistent
overall.
This could have been handled in more commits, but since this requires a
make clean before the build, it seemed more sensible to do it all in one.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
