Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct prefs
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct prefs
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name> (from struct preferences>)
- signal function have <name>_changed (from struct preferences>)
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way SettingsObjectWrapper
handles it) secures the same storage name is used. Having the set/get/load/sync
functions grouped together makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Add qPrefPrivate class which contains one QSettings variable,
delete QSettings from qPref* class definitions
this secures there are only instance of QSettings
(QSettings needs to be in a QObject class to work)
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name in struct preferences>
- signal function have <name in struct preferences>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way SettingsObjectWrapper
handles it) secures the same storage name is used. Having the set/get/load/sync
functions grouped together makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Move few mobile only functions from mobile-helper to mobile-main
remove subsurface-mobile-helper
file structure is now subsurface-*-main.cpp + subsurface-helper.cpp
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
copy Display from SettingsObjectWrapper to qPref as its own class
file. Update Display to use a common load/sync scheme.
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name in struct preferences>
- signal function have <name in struct preferences>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way SettingsObjectWrapper
handles it) secures the same storage name is used. Having the set/get/load/sync
functions grouped together makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit are made to show the use of the low level LOADSYNC macros, which will
be used for special cases. This class is NOT linked into the live system.
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
add 2 header files and 1 cpp file (qPrefPrivate does not have an implementation)
The rewrite/consoliadation of SettingsObjectWrapper, qmlmanager, qmlpref and planner
needs a place to put common private parts (qPrefPrivate) and 1 common class (qPref).
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
remove MapWidget entries from mobile-resources.qrc, and
reference map-widget.qrc in Subsurface-mobile.pro for iOS
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
helpers.h included qthelper.h and all functions declared in helpers.h
were defined in qthelper.h. Therefore fold the former into the latter,
since the split seems completely arbitrary.
While doing so, change the return-type of get_dc_nichname from
"const QString" to "QString".
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Having a split between ios and ios/Subsurface-mobile is just confusing
and without a practical reason
Move files from ios/Subsurface-mobile to ios and update .gitignore
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
