Arguably, the number of filtered dives is a matter of the divefilter.
Let's move it there.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We already allow filtering by tags, but don't even show them on mobile.
That seems rather inconsistent.
First step is to make the tags available to the QML layer.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
To reset the core data structures, the mobile and desktop UIs
were calling into the dive-list models, which then reset the
core data structures, themselves and the unrelated
locationinformation model. The UI code then reset various other
things, such as the TankInformation model or the map. . This was
unsatisfying from a control-flow perspective, as the models should
display the core data, not act on it. Moreover, this meant lots
of intricate intermodule-dependencies.
Thus, straighten up the control flow: give the C core the
possibility to send a "all data reset" event. And do that
in those functions that reset the core data structures.
Let each module react to this event by itself. This removes
inter-module dependencies. For example, the MainWindow now
doesn't have to reset the TankInfoModel or the MapWidget.
Then, to reset the core data structures, let the UI code
simply directly call the respective core functions.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Grammar-nazi ran
git grep -l 'indexes' | xargs sed -i '' -e 's/indexes/indices/g'
to prevent future wincing when reading the source code.
Unfortunatly, Qt itself is infected as in
QModelIndexList QItemSelection::indexes() const
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
This is only used in the mobile UI where the sort direction is fixed and we
refer to dives based on the tree model. So the terms used and the concepts
that these rely on should be guaranteed to be valid.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
MobileSwipeModel is probably not an ideal name, but all I could come up with.
One of the main complications here is that our list is reversed with respect to
the source model. We should change that one day. Probably by moving the
sorting down to the core-model.
Since looking up the source row is somewhat expensive, the lookup is cached for
a single entry because accesses come in bursts for a single dive. This should
be a good compromise and avoids keeping track of a full row-to-dive array.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
In analogy to the DiveTripModel split, derive MobileListModel from a base
model that exports the roles, etc. This will allow us to create a second model,
which nevertheless possesses the same roles and all that without too much code
duplication.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since we want to add a second model, but not have to manage two models
everywhere, create a class MobileModels that contains both of the models. When
calling reset() on that class, it will reset both of the models, etc.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Create a model which represents all top-level items and, potentially, one
expanded trip as a flat list.
Pass down roles to the source model and let the source model handle that. We'll
have to do some ifdef-ery, but so be it.
Additionally, compile the base model on mobile as well.
This contains a couple of hacks to make things compile at all.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
