All users of autogroup are clearly expecting a boolean value, so
let the type reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
All callers of mark_divelist_changed() were passing a bool. Therefore,
let mark_divelist_changed() take a bool and make dive_list_changed a bool.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The new SHA mysteriously caused more than 300 extra warnings in the
app log. It was caused by a code change in Kirigami. The way to
suppress it is, in hindsight, after some hours of searching, trivial.
A Kirigami.BasicListItem shall have an icon defined. And as we do
not care about any icon here, just define it empty.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
This commit consists of the following 3 parts:
1. There are 2 source files added, adapt our build process
accordingly.
2. Due to a change in icon and kirigami QML prefixes, we need to
adapt for this as well. Changed mobile-resources.qrc for that.
When this would not be changed, the icons will not be found.
3. To further prepare for the future, abandon the iconName
property in favour of the new icon grouped property, which
can have more attributes than only the name. But currently
it is only a syntactic change.
Tested on Android device, and no visible changes.
Signedoff-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl
When importing a dive (using import from logfile) and it is a
ssrf/xml file that contains the autogroup setting, the autogroup
is effectuated in the dive list. Not sure that I like this
behavior, but thats the way it currently is. Simply wrong
is that in this case the menu item toggle is not adapted
so we end up with a dive list that is autogrouped, but
the menu toggle is off.
This can be solved by setting the UI toggle in a more central
location.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
A very simple commit to start 2018. When hitting new logbook from
a currently open logbook, and the current dive has tags filled in,
they stayed around in the UI. Just clear them. Further, delete
an unused variable.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
The return produces a warning about "strict-aliasing rules".
Use a union to fit the hash and the uint32_t into the same
block of memory, which obeys the GCC strict-aliasing rules.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123@gmail.com>
Owing to bug #1002 invalid bluetooth device addresses of the form
"devicename (deviceaddress)" or "deviceaddress (devicename)" may
have found their way into the preferences. Recognize such names
and extract the correct address.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
If the BT dialog hasn't been shown, the device name was taken from
the text field, which contained a formatted string. The device open
would then fail.
Fixes#1002
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This fixes a bug reported by Willem that removing waypoints
using the right click context menu makes the cylinder
pressure lines partly disappear.
The reason was that clicking a dive handler disables the
pressure interpolation (and other things, controlled by
shouldCalculateMaxdepth). This is turned on again upon
the mouse release event. This event is not triggered when
selecting in item from the context menu (like remove
waypoint or gas selection) so we need to send it manually.
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
See also commit c032006d91. Compare functions passed
to sort functions need to compare for less-than and not
less-or-equal.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
In MainWindow::on_actionCloudstorageopen_triggered(),
getNotificationWidget()->hideNotification() was called, thus hiding
any error message produced by the cloud code. Notably, the information
"Cannot sync with cloud server, working with offline copy" was
not shown.
Therefore, remove this call. Note that on cloud save messages were
not hidden.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
CID 45172
And one non initalized member hAxis could be removed as it is
not used. Surprisingly, Coverity did not see this.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
This fixes a bug where if the user entered very high ascent (or less commonly
descent) rates such that the time to ascend (or descend) from one level to the
next was less than 10s, that leg would be skipped in the dive plan notes.
Reported-by: Alexander Maier <maieralex@me.com>
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
CID 208296. IndexOf can return -1 when not found, which will
not happen in this context, so just to silence Coverity.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
clear_vpmb_state() was declared with incorrect signature, and all
functios in this change are extern, so declare them as such.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
With commit 5962f00679, a well known problem was introduced.
Incorrect width setting for the spanning trip lines. And as there
is even a specific functon for that, just call this.
The reason the mentioned commit introduces this, is that
invalidate() causes layoutChanged signals, and invalidateFilter()
does not.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
This is mainly code maintenance. Instead of emitting explicit
dataChanged signals, we can make sure that setStringList()
is called after all model data manipulation is ready. Accoording
to the Qt docs: "The model will notify any attached views
that its underlying data has changed".
In itself, this does not solve the tripped assert mentioned in
commit 5962f00679, but this calling at the end just feels
better.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
This "bug" is found using Qt 5.10 compiled in developer mode. Access
the filers, click a little around here, close the filters. Almost every
time the following assert is triggered:
ASSERT failure in QPersistentModelIndex::~QPersistentModelIndex:
"persistent model indexes corrupted", file itemmodels/qabstractitemmodel.cpp, line 643
This is relatively deep down in Qt, and it is triggered by clearing the
filters. Trying to force a crash when using the same scenario in Qt 5.10
compiled for production (so no active asserts) did not result in a crash.
So, upto this time, it is unclear if the Qt assert points out a real problem,
or it is some false alarm (for whatever reason).
Further investigation shows that the assert can be solved by changing the
invalidate() to an invalidateFilter(). Indeed, the last variant is a little
more lightweigt, and does seem to do the same job from a functional point
of view (in this case).
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
