Having this as a pointer is an artifact from the C/C++ split.
The divesitetable header is small enough so that we can
include it directly.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a long commit, because it introduces a new abstraction:
a general std::vector<> of std::unique_ptrs<>.
Moreover, it replaces a number of pointers by C++ references,
when the callee does not suppoert null objects.
This simplifies memory management and makes ownership more
explicit. It is a proof-of-concept and a test-bed for
the other core data structrures.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the taxonomy is now a real C++ struct with constructor
and destructor, dive_site has to be converted to C++ as well.
A bit hairy for now, but will ultimately be distinctly simpler.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Mostly irrelevant std::move() stuff of copy-on-write Qt objects,
a few real bugs, a timestamp_t downconversion and some codingsyle
adaptation.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Unfortunately Coverity doesn't understand that most Qt data
structures are copy-on-write. It's a mis-feature of Qt, but
it is the way it is. Thus, passing by value is not an issue.
Out of ca. 25 warnings only two were legit. Let's silence
the others by either std::move()ing or passing by reference,
as would be idiomatic C++, which Qt is not.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The RemovePictures command filters the pictures provided by the
UI: only actually existing pictures are removed. The code was
buggy: the original list was copied and then the filtered list
was added. Thus, every picture was listed twice leading to
annoying warning messages. Remove the copy.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When adding a picture with GPS information, a dive site was added
if the dive didn't have any. The dive site had the empty string as
name, leading to a confusing UI experience.
We could catch the empty string at numerous places and replace it
by some dummy string. This commit goes the distinctly less invasive
route and adds the dive site with the "unnamed dive site" string
(translated to the user language) as name.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This one is a bit hairy, because two things might happen if the
picture has a geo location:
- A dive gets a newly generated dive site set.
- The dive site of a dive is edited.
Therefore the undo command has to store keep track of that.
Oh my.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The code is rather complex. Firstly, we have different representations
of pictures throughout the code. Secondly, this tries to do add the
pictures in batches to the divepicture model and that is always rather
tricky.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Even though the functionality is seemingly trivial, this is a bit
invasive, as the code has to be split into two distinct parts:
1) Post undo command
2) React to changes to the divelist
Don't compile that code on mobile.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
