Major functional change in this commit is the addition of found static BT devices
to the internal administration (on Android), in a way that is equivalent to
mobile-on-desktop. So, in both cases, the list of devices in the app are
as in the list of devices on the host OS (Linux or Android). To minimize code
duplication, the btDeviceDiscovered slot is split in two parts, the part to
act as slot for the Qt BT discovery agent (Linux, so mobile-on-desktop), and
the part only needed for Android.
Remaining to be fixed: the correct handling of the QML UI selection of
vendor/product. The first default dive computer is correctly detected,
all paired devices from the virtual vendow can be selected, but clicking
through vendors results in non logical selections. It is obvious why
this is, but a fix is not straigforward at this point.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This adds a central function to convert a BT name to a vendor/product pair
known to Subsurface. This allows interfacing from a paired BT dive
computer, without actively selecting its type, but by selecting it
from the list of paired BT devices. So, after this, downloading from
multiple (paired) DCs is also possible.
And not the niced piece of code ...
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This seems a very trivial commit, but it is not. It appears that on an Android
build, with defined(Q_OS_ANDROID) the Q_OS_LINUX variable is also defined.
This results in a very tricky discovery process: 1) the JNI stuff pulls the paired
devices from the local BT controller, and 2) The QT discovry agent gets active
BT devices. 1) is a static list, that is, not dependent on actual
visual/discoverable BT devices; it is just cached data from the phone. 2) On
Android, this results in a list of actively visible (paired and not paired)
devices. On desktop, however (with QT/bluez BT stack) the QT discovery agent
just gets the list of paired devices, so more or less equivalent to the situation
described under 1) for Android.
Ok, a long story, but just do not do a discovery on Android at all. Basically,
we need the BT address, device name, and possibly a specific SPP service UUID. This are
fixed and known for HW and Shearwater at this point, so there is no need for a
(lengthy) discovery process, and making sure the the dive computer is discoverable
at the moment the app wants to construct its data to show in the UI. So, the
static list of paired devices is all we need.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
It's possible that the user has more than one dive computer with the
same name paired with their computer / device. So let's just add the
address to the name to make it possible to tell those apart.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Added a list of paired BT devices for the "Paired BT Devices" vendor. The
devices under this vendor represent all BT devces that can be found
from the local BT interface. Some special processing is required, as
the BT provided data is (obviously) missing the specific data needed
to open a BT device using libdc code. This processing is not in
this commit, but will follow. This commit is preparation for that.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This shouldn't be part of the UI (qmlmanager), but part of our
overall handling of dive computers and BT devices.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
