mirror of
https://github.com/subsurface/subsurface.git
synced 2025-02-19 22:16:15 +00:00
826d27711e
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org> wrote: > Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org> wrote: >>> Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org> wrote: >>>>> I added a few test dives exported from other software (Dm3, DiveLog 5.08, >>>>> JDiveLog 10.2 from Mac - last one doesn't parse because of encoding... Also >>>>> a composed XML zip file from DiveLog isn't supported, yet) >>>>> Find them under dives >>>> >>>> Now this gets interesting. Is there ANY logic in the units in the >>>> dives/TestDiveDiveLog5.08.xml? It seems that some of the temperatures >>>> are in C (Airtemp and Watertemp) and some in F (samples). Otherwise I >>>> would guess we are talking metric here, but I do not see any specs >>>> (another log I have seen from DivingLog had all the units in metric, >>>> as far as I could guess). BTW is the Weight in kg or lb? >>> >>> I have purchased DivingLog and should be able to create any combination >>> of data for the test file that we could possibly want. I'll do a set in >>> a moment that describe what SHOULD be there in their notes, maybe that >>> will clear things up. >>> >>> That said, I really want to release 3.0.1 in the next couple of hours, >>> so this may have to wait for 3.0.2 (if we end up needing that) or 3.1. >>> >>>> The divelogs.de UDCF format looks like it shouldn't take long to write >>>> support for. I'll look into it this evening. >>> >>> It is evening for you, right? No pressure, just making sure I understand >>> what may be coming in in patches in the next hour or two >> >> I currently have one version of the DivingLog XSLT. So a bit of >> verification and that could possibly be used as is. However, this >> could use a bit more testing than a new support to make sure things >> are not going to be any worse than they currently are. >> >> I have not started with the UDCF yet, but that could be reasonably >> fast to implement. However, no guarantees. (And yes, it is evening for >> me) > > I can hold off 3.0.1 a couple hours longer if that is a realistic thing > to do. I don't see the UDCF as that important since we have a different > format from them that we support. So I think the best possible DivingLog > support would be my preference. > > I'll add a few more exported dives from DivingLog next (and fix the > naming of the existing ones). In that case, here is the DivingLog XSLT if anyone can give it a test. miika From 4a62058f4f6fd4780f04bce6e1fe45e20abcf33f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:46:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] XSLT for DivingLog Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| sac-test.xml | ||
| test0.xml | ||
| test1.xml | ||
| test2.xml | ||
| test3.xml | ||
| test4.xml | ||
| test5.xml | ||
| test6.xml | ||
| test7.xml | ||
| test8.xml | ||
| test9.xml | ||
| test10.xml | ||
| test11.xml | ||
| test12.xml | ||
| test13.xml | ||
| test14.xml | ||
| test15.xml | ||
| test16.xml | ||
| test17.xml | ||
| test18.xml | ||
| test19.xml | ||
| test20.xml | ||
| test21.xml | ||
| test22.xml | ||
| test23.xml | ||
| test24.xml | ||
| test25.xml | ||
| test26.xml | ||
| test27.xml | ||
| TestDiveDivelogsDE.DLD | ||
| TestDiveDivelogsDE.udcf | ||
| TestDiveDivingLog5.08.udcf | ||
| TestDiveDivingLog5.08.uddf | ||
| TestDiveDivingLog5.08allimperial.xml | ||
| TestDiveDivingLog5.08allmetric.xml | ||
| TestDiveDivingLog5.08allmetric.zip | ||
| TestDiveDM3.SDE | ||
| TestDiveJDiveLog.jlb | ||