mirror of
https://github.com/subsurface/subsurface.git
synced 2024-11-28 05:00:20 +00:00
a27f67c026
Another futile attempt to cleanup the code and make coding style and whitespace consistent. I tried to add a file that describes the key points of our coding style. I have no illusions that this will help the least bit... This commit should ONLY change whitespace Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
174 lines
5 KiB
C
174 lines
5 KiB
C
#include <string.h>
|
|
#include "dive.h"
|
|
#include "device.h"
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Good fake dive profiles are hard.
|
|
*
|
|
* "depthtime" is the integral of the dive depth over
|
|
* time ("area" of the dive profile). We want that
|
|
* area to match the average depth (avg_d*max_t).
|
|
*
|
|
* To do that, we generate a 6-point profile:
|
|
*
|
|
* (0, 0)
|
|
* (t1, max_d)
|
|
* (t2, max_d)
|
|
* (t3, d)
|
|
* (t4, d)
|
|
* (max_t, 0)
|
|
*
|
|
* with the same ascent/descent rates between the
|
|
* different depths.
|
|
*
|
|
* NOTE: avg_d, max_d and max_t are given constants.
|
|
* The rest we can/should play around with to get a
|
|
* good-looking profile.
|
|
*
|
|
* That six-point profile gives a total area of:
|
|
*
|
|
* (max_d*max_t) - (max_d*t1) - (max_d-d)*(t4-t3)
|
|
*
|
|
* And the "same ascent/descent rates" requirement
|
|
* gives us (time per depth must be same):
|
|
*
|
|
* t1 / max_d = (t3-t2) / (max_d-d)
|
|
* t1 / max_d = (max_t-t4) / d
|
|
*
|
|
* We also obviously require:
|
|
*
|
|
* 0 <= t1 <= t2 <= t3 <= t4 <= max_t
|
|
*
|
|
* Let us call 'd_frac = d / max_d', and we get:
|
|
*
|
|
* Total area must match average depth-time:
|
|
*
|
|
* (max_d*max_t) - (max_d*t1) - (max_d-d)*(t4-t3) = avg_d*max_t
|
|
* max_d*(max_t-t1-(1-d_frac)*(t4-t3)) = avg_d*max_t
|
|
* max_t-t1-(1-d_frac)*(t4-t3) = avg_d*max_t/max_d
|
|
* t1+(1-d_frac)*(t4-t3) = max_t*(1-avg_d/max_d)
|
|
*
|
|
* and descent slope must match ascent slopes:
|
|
*
|
|
* t1 / max_d = (t3-t2) / (max_d*(1-d_frac))
|
|
* t1 = (t3-t2)/(1-d_frac)
|
|
*
|
|
* and
|
|
*
|
|
* t1 / max_d = (max_t-t4) / (max_d*d_frac)
|
|
* t1 = (max_t-t4)/d_frac
|
|
*
|
|
* In general, we have more free variables than we have constraints,
|
|
* but we can aim for certain basics, like a good ascent slope.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int fill_samples(struct sample *s, int max_d, int avg_d, int max_t, double slope, double d_frac)
|
|
{
|
|
double t_frac = max_t*(1-avg_d/(double)max_d);
|
|
int t1 = max_d / slope;
|
|
int t4 = max_t - t1*d_frac;
|
|
int t3 = t4-(t_frac-t1)/(1-d_frac);
|
|
int t2 = t3-t1*(1-d_frac);
|
|
|
|
if (t1 < 0 || t1 > t2 || t2 > t3 || t3 > t4 || t4 > max_t)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
s[1].time.seconds = t1; s[1].depth.mm = max_d;
|
|
s[2].time.seconds = t2; s[2].depth.mm = max_d;
|
|
s[3].time.seconds = t3; s[3].depth.mm = max_d * d_frac;
|
|
s[4].time.seconds = t4; s[4].depth.mm = max_d * d_frac;
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* we have no average depth; instead of making up a random average depth
|
|
* we should assume either a PADI recrangular profile (for short and/or
|
|
* shallow dives) or more reasonably a six point profile with a 3 minute
|
|
* safety stop at 5m */
|
|
static void fill_samples_no_avg(struct sample *s, int max_d, int max_t, double slope)
|
|
{
|
|
// shallow or short dives are just trapecoids based on the given slope
|
|
if (max_d < 10000 || max_t < 600) {
|
|
s[1].time.seconds = max_d / slope; s[1].depth.mm = max_d;
|
|
s[2].time.seconds = max_t - max_d / slope; s[2].depth.mm = max_d;
|
|
} else {
|
|
s[1].time.seconds = max_d / slope;
|
|
s[1].depth.mm = max_d;
|
|
s[2].time.seconds = max_t - max_d / slope - 180;
|
|
s[2].depth.mm = max_d;
|
|
s[3].time.seconds = max_t - 5000 / slope - 180;
|
|
s[3].depth.mm = 5000;
|
|
s[4].time.seconds = max_t - 5000 / slope;
|
|
s[4].depth.mm = 5000;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct divecomputer* fake_dc(struct divecomputer* dc)
|
|
{
|
|
static struct sample fake[6];
|
|
static struct divecomputer fakedc;
|
|
|
|
fakedc = (*dc);
|
|
fakedc.sample = fake;
|
|
fakedc.samples = 6;
|
|
|
|
/* The dive has no samples, so create a few fake ones */
|
|
int max_t = dc->duration.seconds;
|
|
int max_d = dc->maxdepth.mm;
|
|
int avg_d = dc->meandepth.mm;
|
|
|
|
memset(fake, 0, sizeof(fake));
|
|
fake[5].time.seconds = max_t;
|
|
if (!max_t || !max_d)
|
|
return &fakedc;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We want to fake the profile so that the average
|
|
* depth ends up correct. However, in the absense of
|
|
* a reasonable average, let's just make something
|
|
* up. Note that 'avg_d == max_d' is _not_ a reasonable
|
|
* average.
|
|
* We explicitly treat avg_d == 0 differently */
|
|
if (avg_d == 0) {
|
|
/* we try for a sane slope, but bow to the insanity of
|
|
* the user supplied data */
|
|
fill_samples_no_avg(fake, max_d, max_t, MAX(2.0 * max_d / max_t, 5000.0 / 60));
|
|
if (fake[3].time.seconds == 0) { // just a 4 point profile
|
|
fakedc.samples = 4;
|
|
fake[3].time.seconds = max_t;
|
|
}
|
|
return &fakedc;
|
|
}
|
|
if (avg_d < max_d / 10 || avg_d >= max_d) {
|
|
avg_d = (max_d+10000)/3;
|
|
if (avg_d > max_d)
|
|
avg_d = max_d * 2 / 3;
|
|
}
|
|
if (!avg_d)
|
|
avg_d = 1;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Ok, first we try a basic profile with a specific ascent
|
|
* rate (5 meters per minute) and d_frac (1/3).
|
|
*/
|
|
if (fill_samples(fake, max_d, avg_d, max_t, 5000.0 / 60, 0.33))
|
|
return &fakedc;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Ok, assume that didn't work because we cannot make the
|
|
* average come out right because it was a quick deep dive
|
|
* followed by a much shallower region
|
|
*/
|
|
if (fill_samples(fake, max_d, avg_d, max_t, 10000.0 / 60, 0.10))
|
|
return &fakedc;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Uhhuh. That didn't work. We'd need to find a good combination that
|
|
* satisfies our constraints. Currently, we don't, we just give insane
|
|
* slopes.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (fill_samples(fake, max_d, avg_d, max_t, 10000.0, 0.01))
|
|
return &fakedc;
|
|
|
|
/* Even that didn't work? Give up, there's something wrong */
|
|
return &fakedc;
|
|
}
|