subsurface/core/deco.c

606 lines
23 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/* calculate deco values
* based on Bühlmann ZHL-16b
* based on an implemention by heinrichs weikamp for the DR5
* the original file was given to Subsurface under the GPLv2
* by Matthias Heinrichs
*
* The implementation below is a fairly complete rewrite since then
* (C) Robert C. Helling 2013 and released under the GPLv2
*
* add_segment() - add <seconds> at the given pressure, breathing gasmix
* deco_allowed_depth() - ceiling based on lead tissue, surface pressure, 3m increments or smooth
* set_gf() - set Buehlmann gradient factors
* clear_deco()
* cache_deco_state()
* restore_deco_state()
* dump_tissues()
*/
#include <math.h>
#include <string.h>
#include "dive.h"
#include <assert.h>
#include "core/planner.h"
#define cube(x) (x * x * x)
// Subsurface appears to produce marginally less conservative plans than our benchmarks
// Introduce 1.2% additional conservatism
#define subsurface_conservatism_factor 1.012
extern bool in_planner();
extern pressure_t first_ceiling_pressure;
//! Option structure for Buehlmann decompression.
struct buehlmann_config {
double satmult; //! safety at inert gas accumulation as percentage of effect (more than 100).
double desatmult; //! safety at inert gas depletion as percentage of effect (less than 100).
int last_deco_stop_in_mtr; //! depth of last_deco_stop.
double gf_high; //! gradient factor high (at surface).
double gf_low; //! gradient factor low (at bottom/start of deco calculation).
double gf_low_position_min; //! gf_low_position below surface_min_shallow.
bool gf_low_at_maxdepth; //! if true, gf_low applies at max depth instead of at deepest ceiling.
};
struct buehlmann_config buehlmann_config = {
.satmult = 1.0,
.desatmult = 1.01,
.last_deco_stop_in_mtr = 0,
.gf_high = 0.75,
.gf_low = 0.35,
.gf_low_position_min = 1.0,
.gf_low_at_maxdepth = false
};
//! Option structure for VPM-B decompression.
struct vpmb_config {
double crit_radius_N2; //! Critical radius of N2 nucleon (microns).
double crit_radius_He; //! Critical radius of He nucleon (microns).
double crit_volume_lambda; //! Constant corresponding to critical gas volume (bar * min).
double gradient_of_imperm; //! Gradient after which bubbles become impermeable (bar).
double surface_tension_gamma; //! Nucleons surface tension constant (N / bar = m2).
double skin_compression_gammaC; //! Skin compression gammaC (N / bar = m2).
double regeneration_time; //! Time needed for the bubble to regenerate to the start radius (min).
double other_gases_pressure; //! Always present pressure of other gasses in tissues (bar).
};
struct vpmb_config vpmb_config = {
.crit_radius_N2 = 0.55,
.crit_radius_He = 0.45,
.crit_volume_lambda = 199.58,
.gradient_of_imperm = 8.30865, // = 8.2 atm
.surface_tension_gamma = 0.18137175, // = 0.0179 N/msw
.skin_compression_gammaC = 2.6040525, // = 0.257 N/msw
.regeneration_time = 20160.0,
.other_gases_pressure = 0.1359888
};
const double buehlmann_N2_a[] = { 1.1696, 1.0, 0.8618, 0.7562,
0.62, 0.5043, 0.441, 0.4,
0.375, 0.35, 0.3295, 0.3065,
0.2835, 0.261, 0.248, 0.2327 };
const double buehlmann_N2_b[] = { 0.5578, 0.6514, 0.7222, 0.7825,
0.8126, 0.8434, 0.8693, 0.8910,
0.9092, 0.9222, 0.9319, 0.9403,
0.9477, 0.9544, 0.9602, 0.9653 };
const double buehlmann_N2_t_halflife[] = { 5.0, 8.0, 12.5, 18.5,
27.0, 38.3, 54.3, 77.0,
109.0, 146.0, 187.0, 239.0,
305.0, 390.0, 498.0, 635.0 };
// 1 - exp(-1 / (halflife * 60) * ln(2))
const double buehlmann_N2_factor_expositon_one_second[] = {
2.30782347297664E-003, 1.44301447809736E-003, 9.23769302935806E-004, 6.24261986779007E-004,
4.27777107246730E-004, 3.01585140931371E-004, 2.12729727268379E-004, 1.50020603047807E-004,
1.05980191127841E-004, 7.91232600646508E-005, 6.17759153688224E-005, 4.83354552742732E-005,
3.78761777920511E-005, 2.96212356654113E-005, 2.31974277413727E-005, 1.81926738960225E-005
};
const double buehlmann_He_a[] = { 1.6189, 1.383, 1.1919, 1.0458,
0.922, 0.8205, 0.7305, 0.6502,
0.595, 0.5545, 0.5333, 0.5189,
0.5181, 0.5176, 0.5172, 0.5119 };
const double buehlmann_He_b[] = { 0.4770, 0.5747, 0.6527, 0.7223,
0.7582, 0.7957, 0.8279, 0.8553,
0.8757, 0.8903, 0.8997, 0.9073,
0.9122, 0.9171, 0.9217, 0.9267 };
const double buehlmann_He_t_halflife[] = { 1.88, 3.02, 4.72, 6.99,
10.21, 14.48, 20.53, 29.11,
41.20, 55.19, 70.69, 90.34,
115.29, 147.42, 188.24, 240.03 };
const double buehlmann_He_factor_expositon_one_second[] = {
6.12608039419837E-003, 3.81800836683133E-003, 2.44456078654209E-003, 1.65134647076792E-003,
1.13084424730725E-003, 7.97503165599123E-004, 5.62552521860549E-004, 3.96776399429366E-004,
2.80360036664540E-004, 2.09299583354805E-004, 1.63410794820518E-004, 1.27869320250551E-004,
1.00198406028040E-004, 7.83611475491108E-005, 6.13689891868496E-005, 4.81280465299827E-005
};
const double conservatism_lvls[] = { 1.0, 1.05, 1.12, 1.22, 1.35 };
/* Inspired gas loading equations depend on the partial pressure of inert gas in the alveolar.
* P_alv = (P_amb - P_H2O + (1 - Rq) / Rq * P_CO2) * f
* where:
* P_alv alveolar partial pressure of inert gas
* P_amb ambient pressure
* P_H2O water vapour partial pressure = ~0.0627 bar
* P_CO2 carbon dioxide partial pressure = ~0.0534 bar
* Rq respiratory quotient (O2 consumption / CO2 production)
* f fraction of inert gas
*
* In our calculations, we simplify this to use an effective water vapour pressure
* WV = P_H20 - (1 - Rq) / Rq * P_CO2
*
* Buhlmann ignored the contribution of CO2 (i.e. Rq = 1.0), whereas Schreiner adopted Rq = 0.8.
* WV_Buhlmann = PP_H2O = 0.0627 bar
* WV_Schreiner = 0.0627 - (1 - 0.8) / Rq * 0.0534 = 0.0493 bar
* Buhlmann calculations use the Buhlmann value, VPM-B calculations use the Schreiner value.
*/
#define WV_PRESSURE 0.0627 // water vapor pressure in bar, based on respiratory quotient Rq = 1.0 (Buhlmann value)
#define WV_PRESSURE_SCHREINER 0.0493 // water vapor pressure in bar, based on respiratory quotient Rq = 0.8 (Schreiner value)
Rewrite of the deco code o) Instead of using gradient factors as means of comparison, I now use pressure (as in: maximal ambient pressure). o) tissue_tolerance_calc() now computes the maximal ambient pressure now respecting gradient factors. For this, it needs to know about the surface pressure (as refernce for GF_high), thus gets *dive as an argument. It is called from add_segment() which this also needs *dive as an additional argument. o) This implies deco_allowed_depth is now mainly a ambient-pressure to depth conversion with decorations to avoid negative depth (i.e. no deco obliation), implementation of quantization (!smooth => multiples of 3m) and explicit setting of last deco depth (e.g. 6m for O2 deco). o) gf_low_pressure_this_dive (slight change of name), the max depth in pressure units is updated in add_segment. I set the minimal value in buehlmann_config to the equivalent of 20m as otherwise good values of GF_low add a lot of deco to shallow dives which do not need deep stops in the first place. o) The bogus loop is gone as well as actual_gradient_limit() and gradient_factor_calculation() and large parts of deco_allowed_depth() although I did not delete the code but put it in comments. o) The meat is in the formula in lines 147-154 of deco.c. Here is the rationale: Without gradient factors, the M-value (i.e the maximal tissue pressure) at a given depth is given by ambient_pressure / buehlmann_b + a. According to "Clearing Up The Confusion About "Deep Stops" by Erik C. Baker (as found via google) the effect of the gradient factors is no replace this by a reduced affine relation (i.e. another line) such that at the surface the difference between M-value and ambient pressure is reduced by a factor GF_high and at the maximal depth by a factor GF_low. That is, we are looking for parameters alpha and beta such that alpha surface + beta = surface + gf_high * (surface/b + a - surface) and alpha max_p + beta = max_p + gf_low * (max_p/b + a - max_p) This can be solved for alpha and beta and then inverted to obtain the max ambient pressure given tissue loadings. The result is the above mentioned formula. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08 14:37:41 +00:00
#define DECO_STOPS_MULTIPLIER_MM 3000.0
#define NITROGEN_FRACTION 0.79
Rewrite of the deco code o) Instead of using gradient factors as means of comparison, I now use pressure (as in: maximal ambient pressure). o) tissue_tolerance_calc() now computes the maximal ambient pressure now respecting gradient factors. For this, it needs to know about the surface pressure (as refernce for GF_high), thus gets *dive as an argument. It is called from add_segment() which this also needs *dive as an additional argument. o) This implies deco_allowed_depth is now mainly a ambient-pressure to depth conversion with decorations to avoid negative depth (i.e. no deco obliation), implementation of quantization (!smooth => multiples of 3m) and explicit setting of last deco depth (e.g. 6m for O2 deco). o) gf_low_pressure_this_dive (slight change of name), the max depth in pressure units is updated in add_segment. I set the minimal value in buehlmann_config to the equivalent of 20m as otherwise good values of GF_low add a lot of deco to shallow dives which do not need deep stops in the first place. o) The bogus loop is gone as well as actual_gradient_limit() and gradient_factor_calculation() and large parts of deco_allowed_depth() although I did not delete the code but put it in comments. o) The meat is in the formula in lines 147-154 of deco.c. Here is the rationale: Without gradient factors, the M-value (i.e the maximal tissue pressure) at a given depth is given by ambient_pressure / buehlmann_b + a. According to "Clearing Up The Confusion About "Deep Stops" by Erik C. Baker (as found via google) the effect of the gradient factors is no replace this by a reduced affine relation (i.e. another line) such that at the surface the difference between M-value and ambient pressure is reduced by a factor GF_high and at the maximal depth by a factor GF_low. That is, we are looking for parameters alpha and beta such that alpha surface + beta = surface + gf_high * (surface/b + a - surface) and alpha max_p + beta = max_p + gf_low * (max_p/b + a - max_p) This can be solved for alpha and beta and then inverted to obtain the max ambient pressure given tissue loadings. The result is the above mentioned formula. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08 14:37:41 +00:00
double tissue_n2_sat[16];
double tissue_he_sat[16];
int ci_pointing_to_guiding_tissue;
Rewrite of the deco code o) Instead of using gradient factors as means of comparison, I now use pressure (as in: maximal ambient pressure). o) tissue_tolerance_calc() now computes the maximal ambient pressure now respecting gradient factors. For this, it needs to know about the surface pressure (as refernce for GF_high), thus gets *dive as an argument. It is called from add_segment() which this also needs *dive as an additional argument. o) This implies deco_allowed_depth is now mainly a ambient-pressure to depth conversion with decorations to avoid negative depth (i.e. no deco obliation), implementation of quantization (!smooth => multiples of 3m) and explicit setting of last deco depth (e.g. 6m for O2 deco). o) gf_low_pressure_this_dive (slight change of name), the max depth in pressure units is updated in add_segment. I set the minimal value in buehlmann_config to the equivalent of 20m as otherwise good values of GF_low add a lot of deco to shallow dives which do not need deep stops in the first place. o) The bogus loop is gone as well as actual_gradient_limit() and gradient_factor_calculation() and large parts of deco_allowed_depth() although I did not delete the code but put it in comments. o) The meat is in the formula in lines 147-154 of deco.c. Here is the rationale: Without gradient factors, the M-value (i.e the maximal tissue pressure) at a given depth is given by ambient_pressure / buehlmann_b + a. According to "Clearing Up The Confusion About "Deep Stops" by Erik C. Baker (as found via google) the effect of the gradient factors is no replace this by a reduced affine relation (i.e. another line) such that at the surface the difference between M-value and ambient pressure is reduced by a factor GF_high and at the maximal depth by a factor GF_low. That is, we are looking for parameters alpha and beta such that alpha surface + beta = surface + gf_high * (surface/b + a - surface) and alpha max_p + beta = max_p + gf_low * (max_p/b + a - max_p) This can be solved for alpha and beta and then inverted to obtain the max ambient pressure given tissue loadings. The result is the above mentioned formula. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08 14:37:41 +00:00
double gf_low_pressure_this_dive;
#define TISSUE_ARRAY_SZ sizeof(tissue_n2_sat)
double tolerated_by_tissue[16];
double tissue_inertgas_saturation[16];
double buehlmann_inertgas_a[16], buehlmann_inertgas_b[16];
double max_n2_crushing_pressure[16];
double max_he_crushing_pressure[16];
double crushing_onset_tension[16]; // total inert gas tension in the t* moment
double n2_regen_radius[16]; // rs
double he_regen_radius[16];
double max_ambient_pressure; // last moment we were descending
double bottom_n2_gradient[16];
double bottom_he_gradient[16];
double initial_n2_gradient[16];
double initial_he_gradient[16];
double get_crit_radius_He()
{
if (prefs.conservatism_level <= 4)
return vpmb_config.crit_radius_He * conservatism_lvls[prefs.conservatism_level] * subsurface_conservatism_factor;
return vpmb_config.crit_radius_He;
}
double get_crit_radius_N2()
{
if (prefs.conservatism_level <= 4)
return vpmb_config.crit_radius_N2 * conservatism_lvls[prefs.conservatism_level] * subsurface_conservatism_factor;
return vpmb_config.crit_radius_N2;
}
// Solve another cubic equation, this time
// x^3 - B x - C == 0
// Use trigonometric formula for negative discriminants (see Wikipedia for details)
double solve_cubic2(double B, double C)
{
double discriminant = 27 * C * C - 4 * cube(B);
if (discriminant < 0.0) {
return 2.0 * sqrt(B / 3.0) * cos(acos(3.0 * C * sqrt(3.0 / B) / (2.0 * B)) / 3.0);
}
double denominator = pow(9 * C + sqrt(3 * discriminant), 1 / 3.0);
return pow(2.0 / 3.0, 1.0 / 3.0) * B / denominator + denominator / pow(18.0, 1.0 / 3.0);
}
// This is a simplified formula avoiding radii. It uses the fact that Boyle's law says
// pV = (G + P_amb) / G^3 is constant to solve for the new gradient G.
double update_gradient(double next_stop_pressure, double first_gradient)
{
double B = cube(first_gradient) / (first_ceiling_pressure.mbar / 1000.0 + first_gradient);
double C = next_stop_pressure * B;
double new_gradient = solve_cubic2(B, C);
if (new_gradient < 0.0)
report_error("Negative gradient encountered!");
return new_gradient;
}
double vpmb_tolerated_ambient_pressure(double reference_pressure, int ci)
{
double n2_gradient, he_gradient, total_gradient;
if (reference_pressure >= first_ceiling_pressure.mbar / 1000.0 || !first_ceiling_pressure.mbar) {
n2_gradient = bottom_n2_gradient[ci];
he_gradient = bottom_he_gradient[ci];
} else {
n2_gradient = update_gradient(reference_pressure, bottom_n2_gradient[ci]);
he_gradient = update_gradient(reference_pressure, bottom_he_gradient[ci]);
}
total_gradient = ((n2_gradient * tissue_n2_sat[ci]) + (he_gradient * tissue_he_sat[ci])) / (tissue_n2_sat[ci] + tissue_he_sat[ci]);
return tissue_n2_sat[ci] + tissue_he_sat[ci] + vpmb_config.other_gases_pressure - total_gradient;
}
double tissue_tolerance_calc(const struct dive *dive, double pressure)
{
int ci = -1;
double ret_tolerance_limit_ambient_pressure = 0.0;
Rewrite of the deco code o) Instead of using gradient factors as means of comparison, I now use pressure (as in: maximal ambient pressure). o) tissue_tolerance_calc() now computes the maximal ambient pressure now respecting gradient factors. For this, it needs to know about the surface pressure (as refernce for GF_high), thus gets *dive as an argument. It is called from add_segment() which this also needs *dive as an additional argument. o) This implies deco_allowed_depth is now mainly a ambient-pressure to depth conversion with decorations to avoid negative depth (i.e. no deco obliation), implementation of quantization (!smooth => multiples of 3m) and explicit setting of last deco depth (e.g. 6m for O2 deco). o) gf_low_pressure_this_dive (slight change of name), the max depth in pressure units is updated in add_segment. I set the minimal value in buehlmann_config to the equivalent of 20m as otherwise good values of GF_low add a lot of deco to shallow dives which do not need deep stops in the first place. o) The bogus loop is gone as well as actual_gradient_limit() and gradient_factor_calculation() and large parts of deco_allowed_depth() although I did not delete the code but put it in comments. o) The meat is in the formula in lines 147-154 of deco.c. Here is the rationale: Without gradient factors, the M-value (i.e the maximal tissue pressure) at a given depth is given by ambient_pressure / buehlmann_b + a. According to "Clearing Up The Confusion About "Deep Stops" by Erik C. Baker (as found via google) the effect of the gradient factors is no replace this by a reduced affine relation (i.e. another line) such that at the surface the difference between M-value and ambient pressure is reduced by a factor GF_high and at the maximal depth by a factor GF_low. That is, we are looking for parameters alpha and beta such that alpha surface + beta = surface + gf_high * (surface/b + a - surface) and alpha max_p + beta = max_p + gf_low * (max_p/b + a - max_p) This can be solved for alpha and beta and then inverted to obtain the max ambient pressure given tissue loadings. The result is the above mentioned formula. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08 14:37:41 +00:00
double gf_high = buehlmann_config.gf_high;
double gf_low = buehlmann_config.gf_low;
double surface = get_surface_pressure_in_mbar(dive, true) / 1000.0;
Deco artefacts with low GFlow In a dive, when you choose a very low GFlow (like 5 or 9) and a trimix with quite some He (12/48 in the example) and descend fast, the ceiling seems to do strange things in the first minutes of the dive (very very deep for example or jumping around). To understand what is going on we have to recall what gradient factors do in detail: Plain Buehlmann gives you for each tissue a maximal inert gas pressure that is a straight line when plotted against the ambient pressure. So for each depth (=ambient pressure) there is a maximally allowed over-pressure. The idea of gradient factors is that one does not use all the possible over-pressure that Buehlmann gives us but only a depth dependent fraction. GFhigh is the fraction of the possible over-pressure at the surface while GFlow is the fraction at the first deco stop. In between, the fraction is linearly interpolated. As the Buehlmann over-pressure is increasing with depth and typically also the allowed overpressure after applications of gradient factors increases with depth or said differently: the tissue saturation has to be lower if the diver wants to ascent. The main problem is: What is the first stop (where to apply GFlow)? In a planned dive, we could take the first deco stop, but in a real dive from a dive computer download it is impossible to say what constitutes a stop and what is only a slow ascent? What I have used so far is not exactly the first stop but rather the first theoretical stop: During all of the dive, I have calculated the ceiling under the assumption that GFlow applies everywhere (and not just at a single depth). The deepest of these ceilings I have used as the “first stop depth”, the depth at which GFlow applies. Even more, I only wanted to use the information that a diver has during the dive, so I actually only considered the ceilings in the past (and not in the future of a given sample). But this brings with it the problem that early in the dive, in particular during the descent the lowest ceiling so far is very shallow (as not much gas has built up in the body so far). This problem now interferes with a second one: If at the start of the dive when the all compartments have 790mbar N2 the diver starts breathing a He-heavy mix (like 12/48) and descents fast the He builds up in the tissues before the N2 can diffuse out. So right at the start, we already encounter high tissue loadings. If now we have a large difference between GFhigh and GFlow but they apply at very similar depth (the surface and a very shallow depth of the deepest ceiling (which for a non-decompression dive would be theoretically at negative depth) so far) it can happen that the linear interpolation as opposite slope then in the typical case above: The allowed over-pressure is degreasing with depth, shallower depth do not require lower gas loading in the tissue (i.e. can be reached after further off-gasing) but but tolerate higher loadings. In that situation the ceiling disappears (or is rather a floor). So far, I got rid of that problem, by stating that the minimum depth for GFlow was 20m (after all, GFlow is about deep stops, so it should better not be too shallow). Now the dive reported in ticket #549 takes values to an extreme in such away that 20m (which is determined by buehlmann_config.gf_low_position_min in deco.c) was not enough to prevent this inversion problem (or in a milder form that the interpolation of gradient factors is in fact an extrapolation with quite extreme values). This patch that gets rid of the problem for the dive described above but still it is possible to find (more extreme) parameter choices that lead to non-realistic ceilings. Let me close by pointing out that all this is only about the descent, as it is about too shallow depth for GFlow. So no real deco (i.e. later part of the dive) is inflicted. This is only about a theoretical ceiling displayed possibly in the first minutes of a dive. So this is more an aesthetically than a practical problem. Fixes #549 Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2014-06-18 15:11:54 +00:00
double lowest_ceiling = 0.0;
double tissue_lowest_ceiling[16];
if (prefs.deco_mode != VPMB) {
for (ci = 0; ci < 16; ci++) {
buehlmann_inertgas_a[ci] = ((buehlmann_N2_a[ci] * tissue_n2_sat[ci]) + (buehlmann_He_a[ci] * tissue_he_sat[ci])) / tissue_inertgas_saturation[ci];
buehlmann_inertgas_b[ci] = ((buehlmann_N2_b[ci] * tissue_n2_sat[ci]) + (buehlmann_He_b[ci] * tissue_he_sat[ci])) / tissue_inertgas_saturation[ci];
/* tolerated = (tissue_inertgas_saturation - buehlmann_inertgas_a) * buehlmann_inertgas_b; */
Rewrite of the deco code o) Instead of using gradient factors as means of comparison, I now use pressure (as in: maximal ambient pressure). o) tissue_tolerance_calc() now computes the maximal ambient pressure now respecting gradient factors. For this, it needs to know about the surface pressure (as refernce for GF_high), thus gets *dive as an argument. It is called from add_segment() which this also needs *dive as an additional argument. o) This implies deco_allowed_depth is now mainly a ambient-pressure to depth conversion with decorations to avoid negative depth (i.e. no deco obliation), implementation of quantization (!smooth => multiples of 3m) and explicit setting of last deco depth (e.g. 6m for O2 deco). o) gf_low_pressure_this_dive (slight change of name), the max depth in pressure units is updated in add_segment. I set the minimal value in buehlmann_config to the equivalent of 20m as otherwise good values of GF_low add a lot of deco to shallow dives which do not need deep stops in the first place. o) The bogus loop is gone as well as actual_gradient_limit() and gradient_factor_calculation() and large parts of deco_allowed_depth() although I did not delete the code but put it in comments. o) The meat is in the formula in lines 147-154 of deco.c. Here is the rationale: Without gradient factors, the M-value (i.e the maximal tissue pressure) at a given depth is given by ambient_pressure / buehlmann_b + a. According to "Clearing Up The Confusion About "Deep Stops" by Erik C. Baker (as found via google) the effect of the gradient factors is no replace this by a reduced affine relation (i.e. another line) such that at the surface the difference between M-value and ambient pressure is reduced by a factor GF_high and at the maximal depth by a factor GF_low. That is, we are looking for parameters alpha and beta such that alpha surface + beta = surface + gf_high * (surface/b + a - surface) and alpha max_p + beta = max_p + gf_low * (max_p/b + a - max_p) This can be solved for alpha and beta and then inverted to obtain the max ambient pressure given tissue loadings. The result is the above mentioned formula. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08 14:37:41 +00:00
tissue_lowest_ceiling[ci] = (buehlmann_inertgas_b[ci] * tissue_inertgas_saturation[ci] - gf_low * buehlmann_inertgas_a[ci] * buehlmann_inertgas_b[ci]) /
((1.0 - buehlmann_inertgas_b[ci]) * gf_low + buehlmann_inertgas_b[ci]);
if (tissue_lowest_ceiling[ci] > lowest_ceiling)
lowest_ceiling = tissue_lowest_ceiling[ci];
if (!buehlmann_config.gf_low_at_maxdepth) {
if (lowest_ceiling > gf_low_pressure_this_dive)
gf_low_pressure_this_dive = lowest_ceiling;
}
}
for (ci = 0; ci < 16; ci++) {
double tolerated;
if ((surface / buehlmann_inertgas_b[ci] + buehlmann_inertgas_a[ci] - surface) * gf_high + surface <
(gf_low_pressure_this_dive / buehlmann_inertgas_b[ci] + buehlmann_inertgas_a[ci] - gf_low_pressure_this_dive) * gf_low + gf_low_pressure_this_dive)
tolerated = (-buehlmann_inertgas_a[ci] * buehlmann_inertgas_b[ci] * (gf_high * gf_low_pressure_this_dive - gf_low * surface) -
(1.0 - buehlmann_inertgas_b[ci]) * (gf_high - gf_low) * gf_low_pressure_this_dive * surface +
buehlmann_inertgas_b[ci] * (gf_low_pressure_this_dive - surface) * tissue_inertgas_saturation[ci]) /
(-buehlmann_inertgas_a[ci] * buehlmann_inertgas_b[ci] * (gf_high - gf_low) +
(1.0 - buehlmann_inertgas_b[ci]) * (gf_low * gf_low_pressure_this_dive - gf_high * surface) +
buehlmann_inertgas_b[ci] * (gf_low_pressure_this_dive - surface));
else
tolerated = ret_tolerance_limit_ambient_pressure;
tolerated_by_tissue[ci] = tolerated;
if (tolerated >= ret_tolerance_limit_ambient_pressure) {
ci_pointing_to_guiding_tissue = ci;
ret_tolerance_limit_ambient_pressure = tolerated;
}
}
} else {
// VPM-B ceiling
double reference_pressure;
ret_tolerance_limit_ambient_pressure = pressure;
// The Boyle compensated gradient depends on ambient pressure. For the ceiling, this should set the ambient pressure.
do {
reference_pressure = ret_tolerance_limit_ambient_pressure;
ret_tolerance_limit_ambient_pressure = 0.0;
for (ci = 0; ci < 16; ci++) {
double tolerated = vpmb_tolerated_ambient_pressure(reference_pressure, ci);
if (tolerated >= ret_tolerance_limit_ambient_pressure) {
ci_pointing_to_guiding_tissue = ci;
ret_tolerance_limit_ambient_pressure = tolerated;
}
tolerated_by_tissue[ci] = tolerated;
}
// We are doing ok if the gradient was computed within ten centimeters of the ceiling.
} while (fabs(ret_tolerance_limit_ambient_pressure - reference_pressure) > 0.01);
}
return ret_tolerance_limit_ambient_pressure;
}
/*
* Return buelman factor for a particular period and tissue index.
*
* We cache the last factor, since we commonly call this with the
* same values... We have a special "fixed cache" for the one second
* case, although I wonder if that's even worth it considering the
* more general-purpose cache.
*/
struct factor_cache {
int last_period;
double last_factor;
};
double n2_factor(int period_in_seconds, int ci)
{
static struct factor_cache cache[16];
if (period_in_seconds == 1)
return buehlmann_N2_factor_expositon_one_second[ci];
if (period_in_seconds != cache[ci].last_period) {
cache[ci].last_period = period_in_seconds;
// ln(2)/60 = 1.155245301e-02
cache[ci].last_factor = 1 - exp(-period_in_seconds * 1.155245301e-02 / buehlmann_N2_t_halflife[ci]);
}
return cache[ci].last_factor;
}
double he_factor(int period_in_seconds, int ci)
{
static struct factor_cache cache[16];
if (period_in_seconds == 1)
return buehlmann_He_factor_expositon_one_second[ci];
if (period_in_seconds != cache[ci].last_period) {
cache[ci].last_period = period_in_seconds;
// ln(2)/60 = 1.155245301e-02
cache[ci].last_factor = 1 - exp(-period_in_seconds * 1.155245301e-02 / buehlmann_He_t_halflife[ci]);
}
return cache[ci].last_factor;
}
double calc_surface_phase(double surface_pressure, double he_pressure, double n2_pressure, double he_time_constant, double n2_time_constant)
{
double inspired_n2 = (surface_pressure - ((in_planner() && (prefs.deco_mode == VPMB)) ? WV_PRESSURE_SCHREINER : WV_PRESSURE)) * NITROGEN_FRACTION;
if (n2_pressure > inspired_n2)
return (he_pressure / he_time_constant + (n2_pressure - inspired_n2) / n2_time_constant) / (he_pressure + n2_pressure - inspired_n2);
if (he_pressure + n2_pressure >= inspired_n2){
double gradient_decay_time = 1.0 / (n2_time_constant - he_time_constant) * log ((inspired_n2 - n2_pressure) / he_pressure);
double gradients_integral = he_pressure / he_time_constant * (1.0 - exp(-he_time_constant * gradient_decay_time)) + (n2_pressure - inspired_n2) / n2_time_constant * (1.0 - exp(-n2_time_constant * gradient_decay_time));
return gradients_integral / (he_pressure + n2_pressure - inspired_n2);
}
return 0;
}
void vpmb_start_gradient()
{
int ci;
for (ci = 0; ci < 16; ++ci) {
initial_n2_gradient[ci] = bottom_n2_gradient[ci] = 2.0 * (vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma / vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC) * ((vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC - vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma) / n2_regen_radius[ci]);
initial_he_gradient[ci] = bottom_he_gradient[ci] = 2.0 * (vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma / vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC) * ((vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC - vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma) / he_regen_radius[ci]);
}
}
void vpmb_next_gradient(double deco_time, double surface_pressure)
{
int ci;
double n2_b, n2_c;
double he_b, he_c;
double desat_time;
deco_time /= 60.0;
for (ci = 0; ci < 16; ++ci) {
desat_time = deco_time + calc_surface_phase(surface_pressure, tissue_he_sat[ci], tissue_n2_sat[ci], log(2.0) / buehlmann_He_t_halflife[ci], log(2.0) / buehlmann_N2_t_halflife[ci]);
n2_b = initial_n2_gradient[ci] + (vpmb_config.crit_volume_lambda * vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma) / (vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC * desat_time);
he_b = initial_he_gradient[ci] + (vpmb_config.crit_volume_lambda * vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma) / (vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC * desat_time);
n2_c = vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma * vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma * vpmb_config.crit_volume_lambda * max_n2_crushing_pressure[ci];
n2_c = n2_c / (vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC * vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC * desat_time);
he_c = vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma * vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma * vpmb_config.crit_volume_lambda * max_he_crushing_pressure[ci];
he_c = he_c / (vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC * vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC * desat_time);
bottom_n2_gradient[ci] = 0.5 * ( n2_b + sqrt(n2_b * n2_b - 4.0 * n2_c));
bottom_he_gradient[ci] = 0.5 * ( he_b + sqrt(he_b * he_b - 4.0 * he_c));
}
}
// A*r^3 - B*r^2 - C == 0
// Solved with the help of mathematica
double solve_cubic(double A, double B, double C)
{
double BA = B/A;
double CA = C/A;
double discriminant = CA * (4 * cube(BA) + 27 * CA);
// Let's make sure we have a real solution:
if (discriminant < 0.0) {
// This should better not happen
report_error("Complex solution for inner pressure encountered!\n A=%f\tB=%f\tC=%f\n", A, B, C);
return 0.0;
}
double denominator = pow(cube(BA) + 1.5 * (9 * CA + sqrt(3.0) * sqrt(discriminant)), 1/3.0);
return (BA + BA * BA / denominator + denominator) / 3.0;
}
void nuclear_regeneration(double time)
{
time /= 60.0;
int ci;
double crushing_radius_N2, crushing_radius_He;
for (ci = 0; ci < 16; ++ci) {
//rm
crushing_radius_N2 = 1.0 / (max_n2_crushing_pressure[ci] / (2.0 * (vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC - vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma)) + 1.0 / get_crit_radius_N2());
crushing_radius_He = 1.0 / (max_he_crushing_pressure[ci] / (2.0 * (vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC - vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma)) + 1.0 / get_crit_radius_He());
//rs
n2_regen_radius[ci] = crushing_radius_N2 + (get_crit_radius_N2() - crushing_radius_N2) * (1.0 - exp (-time / vpmb_config.regeneration_time));
he_regen_radius[ci] = crushing_radius_He + (get_crit_radius_He() - crushing_radius_He) * (1.0 - exp (-time / vpmb_config.regeneration_time));
}
}
// Calculates the nucleons inner pressure during the impermeable period
double calc_inner_pressure(double crit_radius, double onset_tension, double current_ambient_pressure)
{
double onset_radius = 1.0 / (vpmb_config.gradient_of_imperm / (2.0 * (vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC - vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma)) + 1.0 / crit_radius);
double A = current_ambient_pressure - vpmb_config.gradient_of_imperm + (2.0 * (vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC - vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma)) / onset_radius;
double B = 2.0 * (vpmb_config.skin_compression_gammaC - vpmb_config.surface_tension_gamma);
double C = onset_tension * pow(onset_radius, 3);
double current_radius = solve_cubic(A, B, C);
return onset_tension * onset_radius * onset_radius * onset_radius / (current_radius * current_radius * current_radius);
}
// Calculates the crushing pressure in the given moment. Updates crushing_onset_tension and critical radius if needed
void calc_crushing_pressure(double pressure)
{
int ci;
double gradient;
double gas_tension;
double n2_crushing_pressure, he_crushing_pressure;
double n2_inner_pressure, he_inner_pressure;
for (ci = 0; ci < 16; ++ci) {
gas_tension = tissue_n2_sat[ci] + tissue_he_sat[ci] + vpmb_config.other_gases_pressure;
gradient = pressure - gas_tension;
if (gradient <= vpmb_config.gradient_of_imperm) { // permeable situation
n2_crushing_pressure = he_crushing_pressure = gradient;
crushing_onset_tension[ci] = gas_tension;
}
else { // impermeable
if (max_ambient_pressure >= pressure)
return;
n2_inner_pressure = calc_inner_pressure(get_crit_radius_N2(), crushing_onset_tension[ci], pressure);
he_inner_pressure = calc_inner_pressure(get_crit_radius_He(), crushing_onset_tension[ci], pressure);
n2_crushing_pressure = pressure - n2_inner_pressure;
he_crushing_pressure = pressure - he_inner_pressure;
}
max_n2_crushing_pressure[ci] = MAX(max_n2_crushing_pressure[ci], n2_crushing_pressure);
max_he_crushing_pressure[ci] = MAX(max_he_crushing_pressure[ci], he_crushing_pressure);
}
max_ambient_pressure = MAX(pressure, max_ambient_pressure);
}
/* add period_in_seconds at the given pressure and gas to the deco calculation */
void add_segment(double pressure, const struct gasmix *gasmix, int period_in_seconds, int ccpo2, const struct dive *dive, int sac)
{
(void) sac;
int ci;
struct gas_pressures pressures;
fill_pressures(&pressures, pressure - ((in_planner() && (prefs.deco_mode == VPMB)) ? WV_PRESSURE_SCHREINER : WV_PRESSURE),
gasmix, (double) ccpo2 / 1000.0, dive->dc.divemode);
if (buehlmann_config.gf_low_at_maxdepth && pressure > gf_low_pressure_this_dive)
gf_low_pressure_this_dive = pressure;
Rewrite of the deco code o) Instead of using gradient factors as means of comparison, I now use pressure (as in: maximal ambient pressure). o) tissue_tolerance_calc() now computes the maximal ambient pressure now respecting gradient factors. For this, it needs to know about the surface pressure (as refernce for GF_high), thus gets *dive as an argument. It is called from add_segment() which this also needs *dive as an additional argument. o) This implies deco_allowed_depth is now mainly a ambient-pressure to depth conversion with decorations to avoid negative depth (i.e. no deco obliation), implementation of quantization (!smooth => multiples of 3m) and explicit setting of last deco depth (e.g. 6m for O2 deco). o) gf_low_pressure_this_dive (slight change of name), the max depth in pressure units is updated in add_segment. I set the minimal value in buehlmann_config to the equivalent of 20m as otherwise good values of GF_low add a lot of deco to shallow dives which do not need deep stops in the first place. o) The bogus loop is gone as well as actual_gradient_limit() and gradient_factor_calculation() and large parts of deco_allowed_depth() although I did not delete the code but put it in comments. o) The meat is in the formula in lines 147-154 of deco.c. Here is the rationale: Without gradient factors, the M-value (i.e the maximal tissue pressure) at a given depth is given by ambient_pressure / buehlmann_b + a. According to "Clearing Up The Confusion About "Deep Stops" by Erik C. Baker (as found via google) the effect of the gradient factors is no replace this by a reduced affine relation (i.e. another line) such that at the surface the difference between M-value and ambient pressure is reduced by a factor GF_high and at the maximal depth by a factor GF_low. That is, we are looking for parameters alpha and beta such that alpha surface + beta = surface + gf_high * (surface/b + a - surface) and alpha max_p + beta = max_p + gf_low * (max_p/b + a - max_p) This can be solved for alpha and beta and then inverted to obtain the max ambient pressure given tissue loadings. The result is the above mentioned formula. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08 14:37:41 +00:00
for (ci = 0; ci < 16; ci++) {
double pn2_oversat = pressures.n2 - tissue_n2_sat[ci];
double phe_oversat = pressures.he - tissue_he_sat[ci];
double n2_f = n2_factor(period_in_seconds, ci);
double he_f = he_factor(period_in_seconds, ci);
double n2_satmult = pn2_oversat > 0 ? buehlmann_config.satmult : buehlmann_config.desatmult;
double he_satmult = phe_oversat > 0 ? buehlmann_config.satmult : buehlmann_config.desatmult;
tissue_n2_sat[ci] += n2_satmult * pn2_oversat * n2_f;
tissue_he_sat[ci] += he_satmult * phe_oversat * he_f;
tissue_inertgas_saturation[ci] = tissue_n2_sat[ci] + tissue_he_sat[ci];
}
if(prefs.deco_mode == VPMB)
calc_crushing_pressure(pressure);
return;
}
void dump_tissues()
{
int ci;
printf("N2 tissues:");
for (ci = 0; ci < 16; ci++)
printf(" %6.3e", tissue_n2_sat[ci]);
printf("\nHe tissues:");
for (ci = 0; ci < 16; ci++)
printf(" %6.3e", tissue_he_sat[ci]);
printf("\n");
}
void clear_deco(double surface_pressure)
{
int ci;
for (ci = 0; ci < 16; ci++) {
tissue_n2_sat[ci] = (surface_pressure - ((in_planner() && (prefs.deco_mode == VPMB)) ? WV_PRESSURE_SCHREINER : WV_PRESSURE)) * N2_IN_AIR / 1000;
tissue_he_sat[ci] = 0.0;
max_n2_crushing_pressure[ci] = 0.0;
max_he_crushing_pressure[ci] = 0.0;
n2_regen_radius[ci] = get_crit_radius_N2();
he_regen_radius[ci] = get_crit_radius_He();
}
Deco artefacts with low GFlow In a dive, when you choose a very low GFlow (like 5 or 9) and a trimix with quite some He (12/48 in the example) and descend fast, the ceiling seems to do strange things in the first minutes of the dive (very very deep for example or jumping around). To understand what is going on we have to recall what gradient factors do in detail: Plain Buehlmann gives you for each tissue a maximal inert gas pressure that is a straight line when plotted against the ambient pressure. So for each depth (=ambient pressure) there is a maximally allowed over-pressure. The idea of gradient factors is that one does not use all the possible over-pressure that Buehlmann gives us but only a depth dependent fraction. GFhigh is the fraction of the possible over-pressure at the surface while GFlow is the fraction at the first deco stop. In between, the fraction is linearly interpolated. As the Buehlmann over-pressure is increasing with depth and typically also the allowed overpressure after applications of gradient factors increases with depth or said differently: the tissue saturation has to be lower if the diver wants to ascent. The main problem is: What is the first stop (where to apply GFlow)? In a planned dive, we could take the first deco stop, but in a real dive from a dive computer download it is impossible to say what constitutes a stop and what is only a slow ascent? What I have used so far is not exactly the first stop but rather the first theoretical stop: During all of the dive, I have calculated the ceiling under the assumption that GFlow applies everywhere (and not just at a single depth). The deepest of these ceilings I have used as the “first stop depth”, the depth at which GFlow applies. Even more, I only wanted to use the information that a diver has during the dive, so I actually only considered the ceilings in the past (and not in the future of a given sample). But this brings with it the problem that early in the dive, in particular during the descent the lowest ceiling so far is very shallow (as not much gas has built up in the body so far). This problem now interferes with a second one: If at the start of the dive when the all compartments have 790mbar N2 the diver starts breathing a He-heavy mix (like 12/48) and descents fast the He builds up in the tissues before the N2 can diffuse out. So right at the start, we already encounter high tissue loadings. If now we have a large difference between GFhigh and GFlow but they apply at very similar depth (the surface and a very shallow depth of the deepest ceiling (which for a non-decompression dive would be theoretically at negative depth) so far) it can happen that the linear interpolation as opposite slope then in the typical case above: The allowed over-pressure is degreasing with depth, shallower depth do not require lower gas loading in the tissue (i.e. can be reached after further off-gasing) but but tolerate higher loadings. In that situation the ceiling disappears (or is rather a floor). So far, I got rid of that problem, by stating that the minimum depth for GFlow was 20m (after all, GFlow is about deep stops, so it should better not be too shallow). Now the dive reported in ticket #549 takes values to an extreme in such away that 20m (which is determined by buehlmann_config.gf_low_position_min in deco.c) was not enough to prevent this inversion problem (or in a milder form that the interpolation of gradient factors is in fact an extrapolation with quite extreme values). This patch that gets rid of the problem for the dive described above but still it is possible to find (more extreme) parameter choices that lead to non-realistic ceilings. Let me close by pointing out that all this is only about the descent, as it is about too shallow depth for GFlow. So no real deco (i.e. later part of the dive) is inflicted. This is only about a theoretical ceiling displayed possibly in the first minutes of a dive. So this is more an aesthetically than a practical problem. Fixes #549 Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2014-06-18 15:11:54 +00:00
gf_low_pressure_this_dive = surface_pressure;
if (!buehlmann_config.gf_low_at_maxdepth)
gf_low_pressure_this_dive += buehlmann_config.gf_low_position_min;
max_ambient_pressure = 0.0;
}
void cache_deco_state(char **cached_datap)
{
char *data = *cached_datap;
if (!data) {
data = malloc(2 * TISSUE_ARRAY_SZ + sizeof(double) + sizeof(int));
*cached_datap = data;
}
memcpy(data, tissue_n2_sat, TISSUE_ARRAY_SZ);
data += TISSUE_ARRAY_SZ;
memcpy(data, tissue_he_sat, TISSUE_ARRAY_SZ);
data += TISSUE_ARRAY_SZ;
Rewrite of the deco code o) Instead of using gradient factors as means of comparison, I now use pressure (as in: maximal ambient pressure). o) tissue_tolerance_calc() now computes the maximal ambient pressure now respecting gradient factors. For this, it needs to know about the surface pressure (as refernce for GF_high), thus gets *dive as an argument. It is called from add_segment() which this also needs *dive as an additional argument. o) This implies deco_allowed_depth is now mainly a ambient-pressure to depth conversion with decorations to avoid negative depth (i.e. no deco obliation), implementation of quantization (!smooth => multiples of 3m) and explicit setting of last deco depth (e.g. 6m for O2 deco). o) gf_low_pressure_this_dive (slight change of name), the max depth in pressure units is updated in add_segment. I set the minimal value in buehlmann_config to the equivalent of 20m as otherwise good values of GF_low add a lot of deco to shallow dives which do not need deep stops in the first place. o) The bogus loop is gone as well as actual_gradient_limit() and gradient_factor_calculation() and large parts of deco_allowed_depth() although I did not delete the code but put it in comments. o) The meat is in the formula in lines 147-154 of deco.c. Here is the rationale: Without gradient factors, the M-value (i.e the maximal tissue pressure) at a given depth is given by ambient_pressure / buehlmann_b + a. According to "Clearing Up The Confusion About "Deep Stops" by Erik C. Baker (as found via google) the effect of the gradient factors is no replace this by a reduced affine relation (i.e. another line) such that at the surface the difference between M-value and ambient pressure is reduced by a factor GF_high and at the maximal depth by a factor GF_low. That is, we are looking for parameters alpha and beta such that alpha surface + beta = surface + gf_high * (surface/b + a - surface) and alpha max_p + beta = max_p + gf_low * (max_p/b + a - max_p) This can be solved for alpha and beta and then inverted to obtain the max ambient pressure given tissue loadings. The result is the above mentioned formula. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08 14:37:41 +00:00
memcpy(data, &gf_low_pressure_this_dive, sizeof(double));
data += sizeof(double);
memcpy(data, &ci_pointing_to_guiding_tissue, sizeof(int));
}
void restore_deco_state(char *data)
{
memcpy(tissue_n2_sat, data, TISSUE_ARRAY_SZ);
data += TISSUE_ARRAY_SZ;
memcpy(tissue_he_sat, data, TISSUE_ARRAY_SZ);
data += TISSUE_ARRAY_SZ;
Rewrite of the deco code o) Instead of using gradient factors as means of comparison, I now use pressure (as in: maximal ambient pressure). o) tissue_tolerance_calc() now computes the maximal ambient pressure now respecting gradient factors. For this, it needs to know about the surface pressure (as refernce for GF_high), thus gets *dive as an argument. It is called from add_segment() which this also needs *dive as an additional argument. o) This implies deco_allowed_depth is now mainly a ambient-pressure to depth conversion with decorations to avoid negative depth (i.e. no deco obliation), implementation of quantization (!smooth => multiples of 3m) and explicit setting of last deco depth (e.g. 6m for O2 deco). o) gf_low_pressure_this_dive (slight change of name), the max depth in pressure units is updated in add_segment. I set the minimal value in buehlmann_config to the equivalent of 20m as otherwise good values of GF_low add a lot of deco to shallow dives which do not need deep stops in the first place. o) The bogus loop is gone as well as actual_gradient_limit() and gradient_factor_calculation() and large parts of deco_allowed_depth() although I did not delete the code but put it in comments. o) The meat is in the formula in lines 147-154 of deco.c. Here is the rationale: Without gradient factors, the M-value (i.e the maximal tissue pressure) at a given depth is given by ambient_pressure / buehlmann_b + a. According to "Clearing Up The Confusion About "Deep Stops" by Erik C. Baker (as found via google) the effect of the gradient factors is no replace this by a reduced affine relation (i.e. another line) such that at the surface the difference between M-value and ambient pressure is reduced by a factor GF_high and at the maximal depth by a factor GF_low. That is, we are looking for parameters alpha and beta such that alpha surface + beta = surface + gf_high * (surface/b + a - surface) and alpha max_p + beta = max_p + gf_low * (max_p/b + a - max_p) This can be solved for alpha and beta and then inverted to obtain the max ambient pressure given tissue loadings. The result is the above mentioned formula. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08 14:37:41 +00:00
memcpy(&gf_low_pressure_this_dive, data, sizeof(double));
data += sizeof(double);
memcpy(&ci_pointing_to_guiding_tissue, data, sizeof(int));
}
int deco_allowed_depth(double tissues_tolerance, double surface_pressure, struct dive *dive, bool smooth)
{
int depth;
Rewrite of the deco code o) Instead of using gradient factors as means of comparison, I now use pressure (as in: maximal ambient pressure). o) tissue_tolerance_calc() now computes the maximal ambient pressure now respecting gradient factors. For this, it needs to know about the surface pressure (as refernce for GF_high), thus gets *dive as an argument. It is called from add_segment() which this also needs *dive as an additional argument. o) This implies deco_allowed_depth is now mainly a ambient-pressure to depth conversion with decorations to avoid negative depth (i.e. no deco obliation), implementation of quantization (!smooth => multiples of 3m) and explicit setting of last deco depth (e.g. 6m for O2 deco). o) gf_low_pressure_this_dive (slight change of name), the max depth in pressure units is updated in add_segment. I set the minimal value in buehlmann_config to the equivalent of 20m as otherwise good values of GF_low add a lot of deco to shallow dives which do not need deep stops in the first place. o) The bogus loop is gone as well as actual_gradient_limit() and gradient_factor_calculation() and large parts of deco_allowed_depth() although I did not delete the code but put it in comments. o) The meat is in the formula in lines 147-154 of deco.c. Here is the rationale: Without gradient factors, the M-value (i.e the maximal tissue pressure) at a given depth is given by ambient_pressure / buehlmann_b + a. According to "Clearing Up The Confusion About "Deep Stops" by Erik C. Baker (as found via google) the effect of the gradient factors is no replace this by a reduced affine relation (i.e. another line) such that at the surface the difference between M-value and ambient pressure is reduced by a factor GF_high and at the maximal depth by a factor GF_low. That is, we are looking for parameters alpha and beta such that alpha surface + beta = surface + gf_high * (surface/b + a - surface) and alpha max_p + beta = max_p + gf_low * (max_p/b + a - max_p) This can be solved for alpha and beta and then inverted to obtain the max ambient pressure given tissue loadings. The result is the above mentioned formula. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08 14:37:41 +00:00
double pressure_delta;
/* Avoid negative depths */
pressure_delta = tissues_tolerance > surface_pressure ? tissues_tolerance - surface_pressure : 0.0;
Rewrite of the deco code o) Instead of using gradient factors as means of comparison, I now use pressure (as in: maximal ambient pressure). o) tissue_tolerance_calc() now computes the maximal ambient pressure now respecting gradient factors. For this, it needs to know about the surface pressure (as refernce for GF_high), thus gets *dive as an argument. It is called from add_segment() which this also needs *dive as an additional argument. o) This implies deco_allowed_depth is now mainly a ambient-pressure to depth conversion with decorations to avoid negative depth (i.e. no deco obliation), implementation of quantization (!smooth => multiples of 3m) and explicit setting of last deco depth (e.g. 6m for O2 deco). o) gf_low_pressure_this_dive (slight change of name), the max depth in pressure units is updated in add_segment. I set the minimal value in buehlmann_config to the equivalent of 20m as otherwise good values of GF_low add a lot of deco to shallow dives which do not need deep stops in the first place. o) The bogus loop is gone as well as actual_gradient_limit() and gradient_factor_calculation() and large parts of deco_allowed_depth() although I did not delete the code but put it in comments. o) The meat is in the formula in lines 147-154 of deco.c. Here is the rationale: Without gradient factors, the M-value (i.e the maximal tissue pressure) at a given depth is given by ambient_pressure / buehlmann_b + a. According to "Clearing Up The Confusion About "Deep Stops" by Erik C. Baker (as found via google) the effect of the gradient factors is no replace this by a reduced affine relation (i.e. another line) such that at the surface the difference between M-value and ambient pressure is reduced by a factor GF_high and at the maximal depth by a factor GF_low. That is, we are looking for parameters alpha and beta such that alpha surface + beta = surface + gf_high * (surface/b + a - surface) and alpha max_p + beta = max_p + gf_low * (max_p/b + a - max_p) This can be solved for alpha and beta and then inverted to obtain the max ambient pressure given tissue loadings. The result is the above mentioned formula. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08 14:37:41 +00:00
depth = rel_mbar_to_depth(pressure_delta * 1000, dive);
if (!smooth)
depth = ceil(depth / DECO_STOPS_MULTIPLIER_MM) * DECO_STOPS_MULTIPLIER_MM;
Rewrite of the deco code o) Instead of using gradient factors as means of comparison, I now use pressure (as in: maximal ambient pressure). o) tissue_tolerance_calc() now computes the maximal ambient pressure now respecting gradient factors. For this, it needs to know about the surface pressure (as refernce for GF_high), thus gets *dive as an argument. It is called from add_segment() which this also needs *dive as an additional argument. o) This implies deco_allowed_depth is now mainly a ambient-pressure to depth conversion with decorations to avoid negative depth (i.e. no deco obliation), implementation of quantization (!smooth => multiples of 3m) and explicit setting of last deco depth (e.g. 6m for O2 deco). o) gf_low_pressure_this_dive (slight change of name), the max depth in pressure units is updated in add_segment. I set the minimal value in buehlmann_config to the equivalent of 20m as otherwise good values of GF_low add a lot of deco to shallow dives which do not need deep stops in the first place. o) The bogus loop is gone as well as actual_gradient_limit() and gradient_factor_calculation() and large parts of deco_allowed_depth() although I did not delete the code but put it in comments. o) The meat is in the formula in lines 147-154 of deco.c. Here is the rationale: Without gradient factors, the M-value (i.e the maximal tissue pressure) at a given depth is given by ambient_pressure / buehlmann_b + a. According to "Clearing Up The Confusion About "Deep Stops" by Erik C. Baker (as found via google) the effect of the gradient factors is no replace this by a reduced affine relation (i.e. another line) such that at the surface the difference between M-value and ambient pressure is reduced by a factor GF_high and at the maximal depth by a factor GF_low. That is, we are looking for parameters alpha and beta such that alpha surface + beta = surface + gf_high * (surface/b + a - surface) and alpha max_p + beta = max_p + gf_low * (max_p/b + a - max_p) This can be solved for alpha and beta and then inverted to obtain the max ambient pressure given tissue loadings. The result is the above mentioned formula. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08 14:37:41 +00:00
if (depth > 0 && depth < buehlmann_config.last_deco_stop_in_mtr * 1000)
depth = buehlmann_config.last_deco_stop_in_mtr * 1000;
return depth;
}
void set_gf(short gflow, short gfhigh, bool gf_low_at_maxdepth)
{
if (gflow != -1)
buehlmann_config.gf_low = (double)gflow / 100.0;
if (gfhigh != -1)
buehlmann_config.gf_high = (double)gfhigh / 100.0;
buehlmann_config.gf_low_at_maxdepth = gf_low_at_maxdepth;
}