QPref has only static functions. There seems to be no point in
instantiating a singleton of this object. Remove the instance()
method and remove the Q_OBJECT macro.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
These two member functions were never used, but cause frequent
recompilation of the qPref.cpp file. Remove them for now until
their usefulness becomes evident.
These were the only functions tested in test_qPref.qml. Therefore
remove this test-file.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Including ssrf-version.h in an include file that a lot of files depend on
caused a ton of unnecessary recompiles with every commit. This should reduce
that problem.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
In order to address the C++ object directy in qml, a different
registration is needed.
qmlRegisterType, registers the C++ class, allowing qml code to inherit
from it and make qml objects. This is needed for graphical elemnets
like profile and map
setContentProperty, registers the C++ object, thus allowing signals to be
catched.
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Instead of having all register calls in subsurface-helper.cpp let
qPref.cpp handle all qPref registration, since they also need to be
different
update subsurface-helper and testqml accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Add class variable tooltip_position to qPrefDisplay
Add class variable lastDir to qPrefDisplay
qPrefDisplay is updated to use new qPrefPrivate functions
Adjust test cases incl. qml tests
qPrefAnimations only has 1 variable, that really is a display variable
Merge the variable into qPrefDisplay, to simplify setup (and avoid loading
extra page in qml).
correct theme to save in correct place, and make it a static
class variable
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Prepare qPref.* to run load/sync
Make variables and methods static to give easy access
Make getter inline to give faster access
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>:wq
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct prefs
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct prefs
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
We can argue about any of the changes here, but they are the result of our
whitespace.pl script - so if any of this is offensive to you, part of the
resolution will be fixing the script...
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct diveComputer
- set function have set_<name>
- signal function have <name>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way
SettingsObjectWrapper handles it) secures the same storage name
is used. Having the set/get/load/sync functions grouped together
makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name> (from struct preferences>)
- signal function have <name>_changed (from struct preferences>)
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way SettingsObjectWrapper
handles it) secures the same storage name is used. Having the set/get/load/sync
functions grouped together makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
remove QSettings header file from qPref.h (which is included in many files)
to isolate the use of QSettings in the total system.
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name in struct preferences>
- signal function have <name in struct preferences>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way SettingsObjectWrapper
handles it) secures the same storage name is used. Having the set/get/load/sync
functions grouped together makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit only defines the class, it is not active in production
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
ensure SettingsObjectWrapper load() loads all display variables.
Copy font setting code from SettingsObjectWrapper to qPrefDisplay
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
add the prepared class qPrefDisplay to SettingsObjectWrapper and thereby making it active.
As a consequence of the uniform naming standard desktop-widgets/preferences_defaults.cpp and
tests/testpreferences.cpp have been updated.
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
add canonical_version and mobile_version to qPref
Having a property in qPref, allows the use in qml, and prepare the
interface for qml testing.
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
add enum to qPref and remove elsewhere
update source core to reference qPref.
the enum cannot be in pref.h because it is to be used in qml and Q_ENUM
need the enum to be defined as part of the class
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
copy Display from SettingsObjectWrapper to qPref as its own class
file. Update Display to use a common load/sync scheme.
Update set/get functions to follow common name scheme:
- get function have same name as in struct preferences
- set function have set_<name in struct preferences>
- signal function have <name in struct preferences>_changed
one class one .h/.cpp is the C++ idiom. Having load/sync of each
variable in 1 functions (in contrast to the distributed way SettingsObjectWrapper
handles it) secures the same storage name is used. Having the set/get/load/sync
functions grouped together makes it easier to get an overview.
REMARK: this commit are made to show the use of the low level LOADSYNC macros, which will
be used for special cases. This class is NOT linked into the live system.
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
Remove cloud_storage_status from qmlprefs.h.
usage to qPref::
enum cloud_storage_status is not used from C, but only from C++, and
having the same structure defined multiple times is a maintenance
challenge.
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
add 2 header files and 1 cpp file (qPrefPrivate does not have an implementation)
The rewrite/consoliadation of SettingsObjectWrapper, qmlmanager, qmlpref and planner
needs a place to put common private parts (qPrefPrivate) and 1 common class (qPref).
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
