We were shifting in the wrong direction. Which caused the field to be marked as
'edited' again, which meant we shifted the wrong way and twice the distance.
This seems to fix the problem for both date and time editing.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
For historic reasons, there where three distinct signals concerning
dive-selection from the undo-machinery:
1) divesSelected: sent newly selected dives
2) currentDiveChanged: sent if the current dive changed
3) selectionChanged: sent at the end of a command if either the selection
or the current dive changed
Since now the undo-commands do a full reset of the selection, merge these
three signals into a single signal.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since all commands now fully reset the selection, there is no point
in keeping track of whether the selection changed on addition or
removal of dives. This can be done in the function that sets the
selection.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Some commands tried to retain the current selection on undo/redo,
others set the selection to the modified dives.
The latter was introduced because it was easier in some cases, but
it is probably more user-friendly because the user gets feedback
on the change.
Therefore, unify to always select the affected dives on undo()/redo().
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the default view is batched by trips, signals were sent trip-wise.
This seemed like a good idea at first, but when more and more parts used
these signals, it became a burden. Therefore push the batching to the
part of the code where it is needed: the trip view.
The divesAdded and divesDeleted are not yet converted, because these
are combined with trip addition/deletion. This should also be detangled,
but not now.
Since the dive-lists were sorted in the processByTrip function, the
dive-list model now does its own sorting. This will have to be
audited.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
We have a very fundamental problem with data-duplication in
core and qt-models. In a particular case, this led to an easily
reproducible crash:
1) An undo command moved the last dive of a trip to another.
2) When an undo-command removed the last dive of
a trip to a different trip, the dive was removed from the
trip in the core. Then, the model was updated.
3) That lead at first to a rearrangement of the trips, because
the trip with the added dive is moved before the trip with
the removed dive.
4) In such a case, the filter-model checks the visibility of
the trip.
5) Since the trip with the removed dive has no dives in the core,
visibility was determined as false.
6) From this point on the mappings of the QSortFilterProxyModel
were messed up. Accesses led to crashes. It is unclear
whether this is a Qt bug or only a QOI issue.
As a quick-fix, cache the visibility flag of trips directly
in the Qt-models. Don't set the visibility directly in the
core, but go via the Qt-models. Thus, a more clear layering
is achieved.
In the long run, we can hopefully get rid of the data-duplication
in the models.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Instead of calling into the planner, simply create the dive computer
information right there, using the existing helper function we have to
create simple profiles.
Fixes#2128
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
In signals dives were sorted by date. This criterion is not be unique.
Therefore sort by the dive_less_than() function of the core to avoid
any inconsistencies between the Qt-models and the core data.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There is this anti-pattern in QModel data() functions to assign
to a "ret" variable and return at the end of the function. This
is inefficient, as the object is not directly constructed at
the space reserved by the caller.
Change the functions in WeightModel and CylinderModel to return
the objects directly.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The last direct user of the used parameter was removed in
16276faa45, the last actual user in
e2bbd0ceec.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This was reimplementing functionality that was already there.
Simply call the already existing function.
Thus, we don't have to export the grow_dive_table function.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The cns_table was only used in divelist.c. Make it of static
linkage accordingly.
The cns_table_headers enum is likewise only used in divelist.c.
Therefore move it from the header to the .c file.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The function declarations of regressiona(), regressionb() and
reset_regression() were given in an independent translation unit.
Move them into the proper header file. To ensure consistent function
signatures is the whole point of header files, after all.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The lookup tables decostoplevels_metric and decostoplevels_imperial
in planner.c were not used outside the translation unit. Make them
static.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
gaspressure.h had definitions of non-exported structs, but did
not declare the only function exported by gaspressure.c.
Therefore, move the struct definitions into gaspressure.c and
the declarations of the populate_pressure_information() function
from profile.c to gaspressures.h.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
But only functions that operate only on gases. Functions concerning
cylinders or dives remain in dive.c or are moved to equipment.c
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
gas_density() was declared extern in the header and defined inline
in the translation unit. I didn't even realize that this oxymoron
is valid. Remove inline and an Java-style function definition.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
These functions were spread out over dive.c and divelist.c.
Move them into their own file to make all this a bit less monolithic.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There is an equipment.c file, but no corresponding header. Move the
corresponding functions into a newly created header. This does not
improve compile time since, at least for now, equipment.h is included
in dive.h. But it makes things more consistent.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The comment said "Clear everything but the first element" but
actually the macro freed the whole list including the first element.
For dive computers it was explicitly called on the second element.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Make dive.h a bit slimmer. It's only a drop in the bucket - but at
least when modifying tag functions not the *whole* application is
rebuilt anymore.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Headers should not have to be included in a certain order.
Therefore include stdarg.h and stdio.h in membuffer.h, since
the latter uses FILE and va_list.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There is a function for copying tag-lists, use that instead of the
raw STRUCTURED_LIST_COPY macro-invocation. This will help in moving
tag functions into their own translation unit.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This was probably used for debugging but has no callers anymore.
Let's remove it. If needed, it can be trivially readded.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When a different field is edited, hide any old multi-dive-edit
warning message. The reason is that we might want to add an "undo"
button to the message. But this will undo the wrong command if
we don't hide the message.
Sadly, this means that we can't use animated show / hide, because
an animatedHide() followed immediately by an animatedShow() does
not necessarily show the message. In other words, and animatedShow()
does not interupt a started animatedHide()!?
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The multiple-dives-edited message was shown even if the value was
not changed. Notably, when tab-flipping through the dive fields.
Therefore, changed the execute_edit() function to return zero
when no command was executed. For this, return a boolean from
the execute() function indicating whether the command was really
executed or trashed.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
On the MainTab, warn if more than one dive was edited. To this purpose,
add a new KMessageWidget with an "OK" button that closes the message.
Code is mostly a copy of the already existing "Editing dive" message.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a pointless one-liner function. Let's remove it. The
message it shows will probably be moved to the profile in the
not-so-distant future anyway.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
To enable a "multiple dives edited" message, return the number
of edited dives from dive edit undo commands. Since there are
two kinds of these commands, viz. normal fields and tag fields,
and the former use templates, create a common base class that
can return the number of dives. Yes, the class hierarchy is
getting scarily deep! At least, this gives a tiny bit of
code-reuse.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When tabbing through the dive-info fields we get *EditingFinished
signals. This would create undo commands. The undo commands should
recognize if nothing changed. But for the temperature fields,
owing to rounding, an unchanged text could actually represent a
different value.
This would lead to very confusing situations:
1) Edit air temperature
2) Press tab to finish editing
3) Focus goes to water temperature
4) Try to undo change in menu
5) When opening the menu water temperature loses focus
6) Water temperature is edited
7) Undo undos the water temperature, not the air temperature
8) Goto 4
Fortunately, QLineEdit fields have the isModified() member function
that returns true if the field was changed by the user. Use
this to prevent this case. This is not a general method, i.e.
it has to applied to every field with that problem. But it is
less intrusive than subclassing the QLineEdit class.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
