Besides making it more simple to add a new test now since
you don't need to play hide and seek with the main cmake
this has another good thing: on IDE's that scan the cmake
to create targets on the project tree, the main project
was being popullated with test-targets on the main tree
and not inside the tests directory.
Signed-off-by: Tomaz Canabrava <tomaz.canabrava@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
We really should be able to parse the coordinates that we show in our own
HTML export as well as the standard Google format... both have a comma
between the latitude and longitude.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The purpose of testing against known Subsurface runtimes is to warn (when test
is run in verbose mode) if the runtime has altered. Before the next release, we
should update the known Subsurface runtimes to match current behaviour, so we
are alerted when we change something during the next release cycle.
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Commit 9d8b0ad introduces the copy_prefs function, and uses it to replace prefs
= default_prefs. We need to include subsurfacestartup.h for it to work in
testplan.cpp, otherwise TestPlan_build fails.
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
When just assigning one structure to the other we copy the string
pointers. If we then modify those strings in the copy, we happily free
the strings of the original. And then resetting the preferences equally
happily reused those strings, pointing to long since freed memory.
I think what I did now is excessive for the current use case in that it
copies a ton of strings that are unset in the default_prefs. But I figured
this is a rarely used function and I might as well do it correctly.
Also, once we implement multi user support with per user preferences we
will be copying completely populated preferences around (at least that's
my guess).
Fixes#940
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This shouldn't happen, but in case there is a logic error higher up in the
code somewhere, this will prevent it from happening, period.
If the code asks for a new dive site with a specific uuid, simply return
the existing dive site with that uuid.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The VPM-B benchmark results are all based on nominal/zero conservatism, so we
should make sure we use zero conservatism in the tests.
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
If variables were accidentally carried through from a previous calculated plan,
subsequent plan could be affected. This test aims to detect if this happens.
Commit 8994270 corrected such a bug. If it were reverted, this test would fail
(as it should).
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
From 31e324797c06d366f49db453a67a119819ca8012 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Robert C. Helling" <helling@atdotde.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 17:28:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Test that there is a dive
so that the TestGitStorage does not hang when offline.
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
... as the former was introduced only in Qt 5.5 in order to make the
test build also with 5.4
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
We should compare the calculated runtime against the runtime previously
calculated by Subsurface, expecting them to match exactly, in order to detect if
a change has been made. We still compare against a benchmark, allowing some
difference.
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This is useful for determining why we calculate a difference profile
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Add more VPM-B planner tests. The "expected" total run time is taken as the
total run time produced by the Fortran VPM-B program. For all these tests, the
results are within two minutes, which is a good result, but most are classified
as a "fail".
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This adds a test for 100 m for 60 min dive on trimix using VPM-B
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
- We add a dive while offline.
- On a different computer (here simulated by a different local cache) we
add a different file.
- Now we go back to the previous local cache (the one where we added a
different dive in the first step) and take that online (i.e., connect to
cloud storage). Now both of the new dives should have been added to our
data file.
This is a rather trivial test with no conflict and a straight forward
merge. We need to add a lot more test cases to make sure this works as
expected and doesn't leave the user with a corrupt state.
Ideally whatever happens, the user should never see an error...
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
All this really does is make sure that the fast forward works if the local
cache has received updates that haven't made it to the server, yet.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This just makes sure that writing data to git storage and reading it back
gives you the same result. Without the fixed generation of initial dive
site UUIDs this fails.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
The old code trusted in Windows new lines with length of 3. The new code
strips out spaces and line ending chars resulting in empty line being
of length 0.
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This validates Seabear import from H3 and T1 dive computers that use new
CSV format to store the logs. The fields wary depending on the dive
mode, thus we need to parse the field configuration during import.
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
With these values I reproduce the runtimes from the UI.
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This sets up a standard dive scenario (30 minutes at 260ft/79m, EAN36 and
Oxygen as deco gases, last stop at 20ft/6m) and calls the planner to set
up a dive plan given certain standard gases.
Instead of trying to verify the complete plans it checks that we switch to
the deco gases at the right depth and the complete duration of the dive
matches our expectation.
The test intentionally fails right now for imperial as we have the wrong
switch depth for Oxygen. See how useful tests are?
On the downside, the test does NOT produce the same plan as Subsurface
when I try to create a consistent setup for both - and I have not been
able to figure out why. There must be some other parameters that I'm not
setting, but I haven't identified them, yet. It's very small differences,
for example in the metric case the stops at 21m, 9m, and 6m are each one
minute shorter in the test than it what Subsurface calculates.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This was a poorly implemented hack when we executed the reverse geo lookup
in the main thread and opening a V2 file could take a very long time. We
need to do the "Welcome" message quite differently.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Also fixed it to correctly parse the mean depth (duh, a test that had a
bug) and added a buddy field for good measure.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
