This is a messy commit, because the "qPref" system relies
heavily on QString, which means lots of conversions between
the two worlds. Ultimately, I plan to base the preferences
system on std::string and only convert to QString when
pushing through Qt's property system or when writing into
Qt's settings.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since all code can now directly access C++ structures these
accessor functions were not necessary.
Split out the table from the filterconstraint source file
and include it directly into the divelog.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Having this as a pointer is an artifact from the C/C++ split.
The triptable header is small enough so that we can
include it directly
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Having this as a pointer is an artifact from the C/C++ split.
The divesitetable header is small enough so that we can
include it directly.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Not strictly necessary, but a "natural" thing to do in a classical
C++ code base.
Move the tiny trip-table into its own source file, since it also
has its own header.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a humongous commit, because it touches all parts of the
code. It removes the last user of our horrible TABLE macros, which
simulate std::vector<> in a very clumsy way.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Nothing against free-standing functions, but in the case
of dc_watertemp(), dc_airtemp(), endtime() and totaltime(),
it seems natural to move this into the dive class and avoid
polution of the global name space.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There was a weird asymmetry, where the undo-commands would
register the fulltext index of the dive, but the core would
unregister the fulltext index in the "unregister_dive()"
function.
To make this more logical, create a "register_dive()" function
in core that does registers the fulltext index.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This was a plain pointer owing to C compatibility.
Replacing it by a unique_ptr<> allows us to make it
'self-desctruct' in the constructor. However, we do this
with a special twist: the data is _not_ copied when copying
the dive, since the copied dive is not registered in the fulltext
system. Hackish, but it should(!) work.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The dive_table will be converted into a table of owning pointers.
Since the trip has only non-owning pointers to dives, turn
its dive_table into an std::vector<dive *>.
Add a helper functions to add/remove items in a sorted list.
These could be used elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Don't access the global trip_table in an attempt to cut down
on implicit accesses of global variables.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the sorted_owning_table depends on the fact that
different elements never compare as equal, make the
comparison function safer in that respect. If all failes,
compare the pointers.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
That was used to parse C-style strings. It was fully replaced
the the std::string version utf8_string_std().
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This had to be done simultaneously, because the table macros
do not work properly with C++ objects.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since struct divecomputer is now fully C++ (i.e. cleans up
after itself), we can simply turn the list of divecomputers
into an std::vector<>. This makes the code quite a bit simpler,
because the first divecomputer was actually a subobject.
Yes, this makes the common case of a single divecomputer a
little bit less efficient, but it really shouldn't matter.
If it does, we can still write a special std::vector<>-
like container that keeps the first element inline.
This change makes pointers-to-divecomputers not stable.
So always access the divecomputer via its index. As
far as I can tell, most of the code already does this.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Not strictly necessary, but more idiomatic C++ and less
polution of the global namespace. This one is so trivial
that there seems to be no reason not to do it.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
add_sample() was used in only one place, and the return value was
always ignored. It took a time parameter, suggesting that a sample
could be added anywhere, but in reality the sample was added at
the end of the list. It used prepare_sample() that copies data
from the previous sample, just to overwrite it with the newly
added sample.
All in all very weird. Simplify the function: just append the
passed in sample and name it accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a rather long commit, because it refactors lots of the event
code from pointer to value semantics: pointers to entries in an
std::vector<> are not stable, so better use indexes.
To step through the event-list at diven time stamps, add *_loop classes,
which encapsulate state that had to be manually handled before by
the caller. I'm not happy about the interface, but it tries to
mirror the one we had before.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the name of an event is not incorporated into the even
structure anymore, we don't need these shenanigans. Just assign
the event name.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a hairy one, because the sample code is rather tricky.
There was a pattern of looping through pairs of adjacent samples,
for interpolation purposes. Add an range adapter to generalize
such loops.
Removes the finish_sample() function: The code would call
prepare_sample() to start parsing of samples and then
finish_sample() to actuall add it. I.e. a kind of commit().
Since, with one exception, all users of prepare_sample()
called finish_sample() in all code paths, we might just add
the sample in the first place. The exception was sample_end()
in parse.cpp. This brings a small change: samples are now
added, even if they could only be parsed partially. I doubt
that this makes any difference, since it will only happen
for broken divelogs anyway.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This allows us to use non-C member variables. Convert a number
of pointers to unique_ptr<>s.
Code in uemis-downloader.cpp had to be refactored, because
it mixed owning and non-owning pointers. Mad.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Some compilers whine when using typedefs with non-C structs with
default initializers. Not yet the case here, but in the future
probably will. So remove them now. No point in C++ anyway.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
